Medical journal retracts false ‘political hit job’ sham study on hydroxychloroquine

[Billiejeens]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

 

[Toro]

You wouldn't care if Trump had not taken it.

He's stopped taking it by the way.

 

[badger2]

It was first mentioned on the snake meat thread in February.

 

[Hellbilly]

Someone just found a right wing fake news site.

 

[Billiejeens]

You wouldn't care if Trump had not taken it.

He's stopped taking it by the way.

The prescription ran it's course.
Do you stop taking medications after the prescription runs it's course?

 

[Billiejeens]

Someone just found a right wing fake news site.

Poor baby

 

[Toro]

• The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine is being widely promoted as a “cure” for COVID-19, but we still lack good data on its true benefits.
• Some small clinical trials have shown possible benefits. But others have shown the opposite.
• Complicating matters, two major studies have been retracted over issues with data.
• The FDA reissued a warning that people shouldn’t take the drug without a doctor’s supervision.

Hydroxychloroquine and Cost: Generic vs. Brand Name

Learn about cost and hydroxychloroquine, financial and insurance assistance, ways to lower long-term costs, and more.

www.healthline.com

The only reason why this matters is because Trump promoted it and his legions of worshippers came to his defense regardless of the medical evidence. That's what cults do.

 

[Billiejeens]

• The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine is being widely promoted as a “cure” for COVID-19, but we still lack good data on its true benefits.
• Some small clinical trials have shown possible benefits. But others have shown the opposite.
• Complicating matters, two major studies have been retracted over issues with data.
• The FDA reissued a warning that people shouldn’t take the drug without a doctor’s supervision.

Hydroxychloroquine and Cost: Generic vs. Brand Name

Learn about cost and hydroxychloroquine, financial and insurance assistance, ways to lower long-term costs, and more.

www.healthline.com

The only reason why this matters is because Trump promoted it and his legions of worshippers came to his defense regardless of the medical evidence. That's what cults do.

Poor baby

 

[colfax_m]

Dr Seigal has Trump Derangement Syndrome.

 

[Billy_Bob]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

I wonder if they are going to smear all the Doctors and nurses who took low dose HCQ to keep from contracting COVID-19 as Trump did?

What is stunning to me is there are 6 or more studies of over 1,500 people where the drug pair HCQ and Azythromycin were 91.2 % effective. Even the Fauci touted drug is only 80% effective that costs 100 times more..

 

[Billiejeens]

• The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine is being widely promoted as a “cure” for COVID-19, but we still lack good data on its true benefits.
• Some small clinical trials have shown possible benefits. But others have shown the opposite.
• Complicating matters, two major studies have been retracted over issues with data.
• The FDA reissued a warning that people shouldn’t take the drug without a doctor’s supervision.

Hydroxychloroquine and Cost: Generic vs. Brand Name

Learn about cost and hydroxychloroquine, financial and insurance assistance, ways to lower long-term costs, and more.

www.healthline.com

The only reason why this matters is because Trump promoted it and his legions of worshippers came to his defense regardless of the medical evidence. That's what cults do.

Medical journal retracts false ‘political hit job’ sham study on hydroxychloroquine



A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.
That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.
Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.
Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.
Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Carlson recounted: “They promoted a study that suggested hydroxychloroquine could really hurt people. Now that study has been retracted. Why? Because it was fraudulent.”

The Lancet has retracted the fake study that singlehandedly led to the suspension of HCQ trials and a ban on the use of HCQ for Covid-19 in France, Italy and other countries. https://t.co/qH4n54JAxS
— Hydroxychloroquine News (@niro60487270) June 4, 2020

Dr. Siegel explained: “On May 19th, the President announced that he was taking hydroxychloroquine. The media wolves descended. And Lancet –a renowned medical journal — soon afterward published a study saying it hastened death and had severe side effects. Everybody was concerned.”

“Then we found out that Lancet was relying on fraudulent data by this company called Surgisphere. Surgisphere has just a handful of employees. One is an adult-content model and another one writes science fiction for a living.
Surgisphere claimed that they have one of the best hospital databases in the world, but they have no Internet presence whatsoever.
So Lancet — this renowned journal, with egg on its face — suddenly withdrew the study [this week].”

There is definitely a cult involved -
I don't think that it's who you think it is.

 

[Billiejeens]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

I wonder if they are going to smear all the Doctors and nurses who took low dose HCQ to keep from contracting COVID-19 as Trump did?

What is stunning to me is there are 6 or more studies of over 1,500 people where the drug pair HCQ and Azythromycin were 91.2 % effective. Even the Fauci touted drug is only 80% effective that costs 100 times more..

They will smear anyone, if they believe it will help paint President Trump in a bad light.
They are a smear-Cult.

 

[Billy_Bob]

• The antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine is being widely promoted as a “cure” for COVID-19, but we still lack good data on its true benefits.
• Some small clinical trials have shown possible benefits. But others have shown the opposite.
• Complicating matters, two major studies have been retracted over issues with data.
• The FDA reissued a warning that people shouldn’t take the drug without a doctor’s supervision.

Hydroxychloroquine and Cost: Generic vs. Brand Name

Learn about cost and hydroxychloroquine, financial and insurance assistance, ways to lower long-term costs, and more.

www.healthline.com

The only reason why this matters is because Trump promoted it and his legions of worshippers came to his defense regardless of the medical evidence. That's what cults do.

Medical journal retracts false ‘political hit job’ sham study on hydroxychloroquine



A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.
That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.
Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.
Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.
Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Carlson recounted: “They promoted a study that suggested hydroxychloroquine could really hurt people. Now that study has been retracted. Why? Because it was fraudulent.”

The Lancet has retracted the fake study that singlehandedly led to the suspension of HCQ trials and a ban on the use of HCQ for Covid-19 in France, Italy and other countries. https://t.co/qH4n54JAxS
— Hydroxychloroquine News (@niro60487270) June 4, 2020

Dr. Siegel explained: “On May 19th, the President announced that he was taking hydroxychloroquine. The media wolves descended. And Lancet –a renowned medical journal — soon afterward published a study saying it hastened death and had severe side effects. Everybody was concerned.”

“Then we found out that Lancet was relying on fraudulent data by this company called Surgisphere. Surgisphere has just a handful of employees. One is an adult-content model and another one writes science fiction for a living.
Surgisphere claimed that they have one of the best hospital databases in the world, but they have no Internet presence whatsoever.
So Lancet — this renowned journal, with egg on its face — suddenly withdrew the study [this week].”

There is definitely a cult involved -
I don't think that it's who you think it is.

No life is precious to the left.. They are happy to kill anyone to get political points and power.

 

[Muhammed]

Dr Seigal has Trump Derangement Syndrome.

^
Projection.

 

[Muhammed]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

When are editors of the Lancet going to learn their lesson? If the authors do not provide the raw data with the SI to be scrutinized by their peers, it's a joke to present it as peer-reviewed literature.

The Lancet has been burned like this before with Wakefield's infamous MMR vaccine and autism study, where he just made up the data to support RFK jr's bogus lawsuits.

 

[Billiejeens]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

When are editors of the Lancet going to learn their lesson? If the authors do not provide the raw data with the SI to be scrutinized by their peers, it's a joke to present it as peer-reviewed literature.

The Lancet has been burned like this before with Wakefield's infamous MMR vaccine and autism study, where he just made up the data to support RFK jr's bogus lawsuits.

In most instances actual science betrays the lefts agenda.

 

[Muhammed]

A widely-cited recent study claiming hydroxychloroquine was ineffective and deadly if used to treat the coronavirus was retracted this week.

That sham study was breathlessly touted to attack President Trump, who noted that numerous physicians had successfully treated COVID-19 patients with the anti-malaria drug.

Dr. Marc Siegel of New York University’s Langone Hospital blasted the left’s shameless “political hit job,” saying they intentionally discredited a potentially promising drug just to smear Trump.

Dr. Siegel’s 96-year-old father was cured of COVID-19 after taking hydroxychloroquine on the advice of his physician.

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson remarked: “For a while there, it looked like hydroxychloroquine might be an effective treatment for the coronavirus. And then the President mentioned the drug. And for that reason, the press suddenly told you it was dangerous.”

Medical journal Lancet retracts sham 'political hit job' study on hydroxychloroquine

Democrats and their media lapdogs humiliated themselves again after a study they gleefully touted to discredit hydroxychloroquine was retracted as a sham.

www.bizpacreview.com

BJ -
Dead citizens are just collateral damage in the war against President Trump.
This is the Democrat Strategy for victory in November -
Seems odd, but -

When are editors of the Lancet going to learn their lesson? If the authors do not provide the raw data with the SI to be scrutinized by their peers, it's a joke to present it as peer-reviewed literature.

The Lancet has been burned like this before with Wakefield's infamous MMR vaccine and autism study, where he just made up the data to support RFK jr's bogus lawsuits.

In most instances actual science betrays the lefts agenda.

They know their base is stupid. They lack the critical thinking skills necessary to discern junk science from sound science. Kinda the same way they cannot discern a factual news report from fake news.