EconChick
Gold Member
- Feb 15, 2014
- 4,678
- 828
- 190
- Thread starter
- #681
toits a good sign that you lack the intelligence to decide which ideology is correct. You should be ashamed but you lack the IQ for it.
Yes, the standard approach of partisan ideologues: "You don't agree with me, so you're dumb."
The grade-school playground approach to politics, very impressive.
How easy it must be to live in a simple, binary, black & white world, us vs. them, an obedient partisan ideologue. Sit! Speak! Roll over!
No thanks. I'll think for myself. It takes more effort, but it's more satisfying. And more honest.
.
And yet you're STILL wrong on this topic.
Could be that you're just not as smart as you think.
Um, wait, it IS that you're just not as smart as you think. Also you've no idea whom I've voted for, dum dum. Just like usual, you make stupid assumptions.
On what, precisely, was I wrong?
And precisely what is the point of your thread?
And by the way, I'm not the one claiming that I'm intelligent. I've never seen anyone here, ever, try as hard as you do. Not even close.
I look forward to your straight and clear answers to my questions above.
.
Dude, you've got to be the most insecure financial advisor I've ever seen. Are you sure that's what you do?
If you didn't care like you claim you don't.....you wouldn't be posting in this thread everyday trying to recover the credibility you lost. You're the one trying so hard. This is my thread...why do you feel a need to keep posting in it? Trying very, very hard, aren't ya? If you have an opinion, why can't you just post it, have your say, and move on. Why not??? Because YOU ARE THE ONE trying too hard.
LMAO. But hey, you libs have the DEFLECTION game down. I'll give you that. But your stupid ass deflection only serves my goals of keeping this thread alive.
Now, let's get something straight. What kind of a fucking idiot asks someone else to go chase down some IRRELEVENT discredited graph that the dumbass posted? You posted the wrong graph; I didn't.
We've been telling you for 30+ pages that you screwed up. Now you want me spending my precious time trying to find it when I first started pointing it out within a page of your stupid posts?
You're like a petulant child.
Show me where Obummer has gotten MEDIAN income up to $55,589? You can't.
And finally, I noticed you completely blew off the thread that talks about global economic malaise coming to America.
Why did you do that? I'll tell you why. BECAUSE IT PROVES MY POINT THAT BARRYS ECONOMY IS ABOUT TO GET EVEN WORSE.
I could care less what party you claim you have no association with. It's clear to all of us you're a Dumb.Ass.Liberal.
Got it?
I post in response to your posts to me. PLUS you have THANKED me MULTIPLE times for "bumping" your thread. Wow, that's about the weakest reason to whine I've ever seen here. But, I won't post any more in this thread. You're welcome.
As I have said multiple times, it's quite correct that income (mean or median, don't care) is less now than it was when Obama took office. That has never been in question. The point I have made multiple times is that it bottomed out due to the Meltdown and has increased for the last three years. You don't seem willing to admit that, but then again, it's you I'm dealing with here.
So you're "point" appears to be the standard right wing partisan ideologue line, that the economy is all Obama's fault. Okay. That is precisely what I would expect. By all means, enjoy pretending that you're an "economist" going forward, we both know that's not true. You're just another hardcore partisan ideologue, dime a dozen.
Still tickled by the fact that you would whine about me posting in your thread after you posted to me so many times, and thanked me multiple times for posting.
You're a hoot, and that was easy.
*** /unsubscribe, per your whining ***
VICTORY!!
You blinked.
Ooops.
No dummy, the economy is in for worse times which I created an entire thread to show you. Median incomes will get worse.
You pretended you didn't see it.
The point of this thread is that O's policies are not helping the middle class like you libs claim.
If pointing out factual differences in policies is partisan, then so be it.