Media to Blame for HalloweenGate Cover-Up

White House spokesman Eric Schultz rejected the book's claims Sunday. He said if administration officials wanted to keep it secret, they wouldn't have invited the press or posted video or photos to the White House website. "Just goes to show you can't believe everything you read in books these days," Schultz told Fox News.

Politico reports the White House explained local schoolchildren, children of military families and those of administration staff attended the event. "Even Johnny Depp’s fans knew about it and posted on their website." Schultz said in a statement.

White House: Despite claims in new book, nothing secret about 'lavish' 2009 Halloween party | syracuse.com

Looks like this book is less factual than the one that told us about Palin lovin' black men.
 
I really have to hand it to President Obama

After three years in office, someone writes an unauthorized tell all book and the biggest scandals in it are:

- Michelle Obama did not like Raham Emanuel
- The Obamas held a Halloween Party and didn't tell about it

God, this must be killing the Republicans as they try to rile up the base.......but at least they got Stephanie
 
So, Stuphie, what kind of toilet paper are those uppity Negroes using in the White House??? I bet it's quilted Northern instead of some economy brand!!!
 
As Cali says if the Obamas payed for it then who cares.

If we the taxpayers footed the bill then you bet your ass its something that should have been reported.

If Bush had done this it would be in 8 in inch letters on the front page of the NYT and the LSM would have covered it 24/7.
 
As Cali says if the Obamas payed for it then who cares.

If we the taxpayers footed the bill then you bet your ass its something that should have been reported.

If Bush had done this it would be in 8 in inch letters on the front page of the NYT and the LSM would have covered it 24/7.

I doubt it...


There were so many worse things to publish about Bush
 
As Cali says if the Obamas payed for it then who cares.

If we the taxpayers footed the bill then you bet your ass its something that should have been reported.

If Bush had done this it would be in 8 in inch letters on the front page of the NYT and the LSM would have covered it 24/7.

I doubt it...


There were so many worse things to publish about Bush

Yea, yea, yea. It's fine to 'hate' Bush, but to 'hate' Obama must be about race, right?
 
As Cali says if the Obamas payed for it then who cares.

If we the taxpayers footed the bill then you bet your ass its something that should have been reported.

If Bush had done this it would be in 8 in inch letters on the front page of the NYT and the LSM would have covered it 24/7.

I doubt it...


There were so many worse things to publish about Bush

The LSM missed no opportunity to bash Bush.

If this had happened it would be one more thing they could bash him with 24/7.
 
As Cali says if the Obamas payed for it then who cares.

If we the taxpayers footed the bill then you bet your ass its something that should have been reported.

If Bush had done this it would be in 8 in inch letters on the front page of the NYT and the LSM would have covered it 24/7.

I doubt it...


There were so many worse things to publish about Bush

The LSM missed no opportunity to bash Bush.

If this had happened it would be one more thing they could bash him with 24/7.

Yes...the Lamestream media can be so unfair

"Bush invades Iraq.....no WMDs found"
"Obama gives speech.....Telepromter used"

"Bush engages in torture"
"Obama plays golf during vacation"

"Bush does nothing as Katrina floods New Orleans"
"Obama gives Halloween Party and tells no one"

"Bush in denial as economy crashes"
"Obama bows to king"
 
FSM misses no opportunity to bash Obama. In fact, they make a lot of stuff up to do so.

(FSM - FauxStreamMedia)

And yeah, they really should be called LSM.
 
FSM misses no opportunity to bash Obama. In fact, they make a lot of stuff up to do so.

(FSM - FauxStreamMedia)

And yeah, they really should be called LSM.

Foxes bashing of Obama is childish and petty....well fitting of their viewership
 
White House spokesman Eric Schultz rejected the book's claims Sunday. He said if administration officials wanted to keep it secret, they wouldn't have invited the press or posted video or photos to the White House website. "Just goes to show you can't believe everything you read in books these days," Schultz told Fox News.

Politico reports the White House explained local schoolchildren, children of military families and those of administration staff attended the event. "Even Johnny Depp’s fans knew about it and posted on their website." Schultz said in a statement.

White House: Despite claims in new book, nothing secret about 'lavish' 2009 Halloween party | syracuse.com

Looks like this book is less factual than the one that told us about Palin lovin' black men.

LOL, less factual, because the white house SAYS so...yet how many pages were on this board over a unsourced person saying Palin went out with a black man?
you people ARE JOKES.
 
Last edited:
FSM misses no opportunity to bash Obama. In fact, they make a lot of stuff up to do so.

(FSM - FauxStreamMedia)

And yeah, they really should be called LSM.

Foxes bashing of Obama is childish and petty....well fitting of their viewership

redfox.jpg


Them pesky foxes!
 
This is when you realize that the right has run out of ideas.

When they attack a party Obama threw for the children of American servicemen and women.
 
This is when you realize that the right has run out of ideas.

When they attack a party Obama threw for the children of American servicemen and women.

If they did, indeed throw a 'party for the children of American servicemen and women', why hide it? There was absolutely no reason to hide it. It was not 'for' the 'children of American servicemen and women' at all but honesty is not a priority for you, is it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top