Media Protecting Anti-cop Protesters After 2 Cops Are Killed Yet They Attacked The Tea Party

Remember, Reverend Disco Louie is the preacher who proclaimed the Messiahship of one Barack Hussein Obama. How can the left find any fault with anything else he might say?

Paul Hill believed Jesus was the Messiah. How can the Right find any fault in anything else he did or said?
 
If Cliven Bundy and his Waco-obsessed followers had been black, they'd be dead.

crystal ball tell you that?
for crying out loud. You hate on a white rancher but let someone like Al Sharpton and his squad of GOONS slide
 
Here is your problem mudslinger...you listen to lying sacks of shit like Goldberg...

GOLDBERG: “I agree it was wrong and we shouldn’t be doing the same thing in this circumstance. At the same time, when you have Al Sharpton’s little rent-a-mobs going out there saying, ‘What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.’ That is a substantively different thing than anything you can ascribe to Sarah Palin’s Facebook map, and the way that stuff was covered was much, much different, and much less hostile, than the stuff we’ve seen on the right.”

Fox & Friends Airs Misleading Footage To Suggest Al Sharpton Led Protesters Calling For "Dead Cops"
Fox's Clayton Morris: Al Sharpton Is "Calling To Kill Cops"

sharptoncops.jpg


Fox & Friends Sunday repeatedly spliced footage of Al Sharpton speaking at a Washington, D.C. "Justice for All" march with footage from a separate event in New York City where some in the crowd chanted for "dead cops" to claim Sharpton is "calling to kill cops."

The December 14 edition of Fox & Friends Sunday opened with video from a December 13 march in New York City where some protesters chanted, "What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now." Co-host Anna Kooiman set up the footage by saying, "Thousands march with Al Sharpton against the police," and later promised "more from Sharpton's 'March for Justice.'"

But the footage of protesters chanting anti-police slogans was not from Sharpton's December 13 march, which The Washington Post described as a "peaceful civil rights march led by families of the slain and organized by the Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network."

In a later segment flagged by liberal news site Raw Story, Fox sandwiched -- without explanation -- a clip of the "dead cops" chant in between two clips of Sharpton speaking at the "Justice for All" rally, conflating the two events.

Although an on-screen graphic identified the "dead cop" chant as coming from the New York City protest, co-host Tucker Carlson strongly implied that all the footage shown was from Sharpton's event, stating, "Huh. So the first clip you heard people are saying, 'We want the cops dead.' And the second you heard Al Sharpton say 'We're not against the police.'"
 
If Cliven Bundy and his Waco-obsessed followers had been black, they'd be dead.

crystal ball tell you that?
for crying out loud. You hate on a white rancher but let someone like Al Sharpton and his squad of GOONS slide

Why do you defend Bundy? Why take Bundy's side against law enforcement while you take law enforcement's side against Eric Garner?
 
Oh, btw, this line of attack by the Right is nothing more than despicable attempt to use an absurdly fallacious guilt by association argument to try to stifle the free speech of those they disagree with.

That is ALL it is.
 
The murderer was a Democrat. So of course the Communist/Democrat-dominated MSM is protecting those who incited it. I'm sure Democrat Media outlets like CNN and NBC will continue to spin for the shit-stirrers and this murderer. It's completely expected. No one should be surprised.
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.

The American MSM is dominated by Communist/Democrat Media outlets. This murderer was a fellow Democrat, and so are those who incited it. So just do the math. Of course the Democrat-dominated MSM is gonna spin for em. It is very sad, but it is what it is.
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.

The American MSM is dominated by Communist/Democrat Media outlets. This murderer was a fellow Democrat, and so are those who incited it. So just do the math. Of course the Democrat-dominated MSM is gonna spin for em. It is very sad, but it is what it is.

The killer hated the police, just like you do.
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.

And you can prove that the perpetrator heard those chants and that caused him to carry out the murders?
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.

And you can prove that the perpetrator heard those chants and that caused him to carry out the murders?
Chanted to kill police, police get killed. Liberal news stations don't hardly cover it. You couldn't care less, you have blood on your hands.
 
Gee, good point, because let's not forget all the fair to favorable coverage the rightwing propaganda machine gave the occupy wall street protestors, or the anti-Iraq war protestors,

in exactly the same way they covered the Tea Partiers.

Fuck off with your retarded bullshit.
Okay. But first ... show me where calling for spending cuts led to the deaths of anyone dipshit?

Show us where anything any liberal said led to the deaths of cops,

and prove cause and effect.
There was chanting for dead cops and the liberal media is not covering it.

And you can prove that the perpetrator heard those chants and that caused him to carry out the murders?
Chanted to kill police, police get killed. Liberal news stations don't hardly cover it. You couldn't care less, you have blood on your hands.

You know, repeating a bullshit rant over and over again won't make it come true.

btw, when did I chant for dead cops?
 
The media is attempting to mislead us into thinking that this fake protest movement didn't lead to the deaths of 2 police officers. It's predictable and utterly pathetic to watch:


Jonah Goldberg: Protecting the Protesters vs. Trashing the Tea Party

By Rich Noyes | December 22, 2014 | 2:10 PM EST


Nearly four years ago, the media establishment swiftly and baselessly linked the Tea Party to the shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. But after this weekend’s murder of two New York City police officers, by a gunman who used the hashtag #ShootThePolice, there was no rush at ABC, CBS or NBC to condemn anti-police protesters who have employed the chant: “What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.”

National Review’s Jonah Goldberg highlighted the outrageous double standard on Sunday’s MediaBuzz on the Fox News Channel:

JONAH GOLDBERG: “You know, we talk about the disconnectioning coverage or the biases between left and the right in the coverage. You know, I remember quite vividly the Tucson shooter being blamed entirely on Michele Bachmann and on Sarah Palin and on the right wingers.
Host HOWARD KURTZ: Yes, and that was wrong. And I said so at the time.
GOLDBERG: “I agree it was wrong and we shouldn’t be doing the same thing in this circumstance. At the same time, when you have Al Sharpton’s little rent-a-mobs going out there saying, ‘What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.’ That is a substantively different thing than anything you can ascribe to Sarah Palin’s Facebook map, and the way that stuff was covered was much, much different, and much less hostile, than the stuff we’ve seen on the right.”



SmithSteph.JPG
Proving Goldberg’s point, on Sunday’s Good Morning America on ABC, while there was no mention anywhere in the show of the chants in favor of “dead cops,” fill-in co-host Ryan Smith worried about the effect on protesters who have been demonstrating against police tactics.

“Is there a concern that these killings could lead to a rise in tension against the protesters, despite movement leaders condemning the attacks?” Smith asked George Stephanopoulos.

Such delicacy was nowhere to be found in January 2011, when all three broadcast networks falsely associated the attack on Giffords with the Tea Party and Sarah Palin. A flashback recalling some of the more notorious quotes from that time:



■ “We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was. She’s been the target of violence before....Her father says that ‘the whole Tea Party’ was her enemy. And yes, she was on Sarah Palin’s infamous ‘crosshairs’ list. Just yesterday, Ezra Klein remarked that opposition to health reform was getting scary. Actually, it’s been scary for quite a while, in a way that already reminded many of us of the climate that preceded the Oklahoma City bombing....Violent acts are what happen when you create a climate of hate. And it’s long past time for the GOP’s leaders to take a stand against the hate-mongers.”
New York Times columnist Paul Krugman in a 3:22pm ET January 8 , 2011 blog posted less than two hours after news broke of Giffords’ shooting.



■ “Giffords was one of 20 Democrats whose districts were lit up in crosshairs on a Sarah Palin campaign Web site last spring. Giffords and many others complained that someone unstable might act on that imagery.”
— CBS’s Nancy Cordes on the January 8, 2011 Evening News. The map was of districts targeted as part of an electoral strategy to defeat supporters of ObamaCare.



■ “On Twitter and Facebook, there is a lot of talk, in particular, about Sarah Palin. As you might recall, back in March of last year, when the health care vote was coming to the floor of the House and this was all heating up, Palin tweeted out a message on Twitter saying ‘common sense conservatives, don’t retreat - instead reload.’ And she referred folks to her Facebook page. On that Facebook page was a list of Democratic members she was putting in crosshairs, and Gabrielle Giffords was one of those in the crosshairs.”
— CNN’s Jessica Yellin during the 10pm ET hour of Newsroom, January 8, 2011.



■ “You know, Congresswoman Giffords had received threats before. That’s something that we might have overlooked here. Her office was trashed during the health care debate. When she showed up on Sarah Palin’s political action committee Web site as one of those who had been targeted for defeat, it shows her in the crosshairs there. She warned herself that this kind of thing could have serious repercussions.”
— CBS’s Bob Schieffer on Face the Nation, January 9, 2011.



■ “Sarah Palin has been coming under some criticism. While there is no evidence her Web site featuring a target on Giffords’ district had anything to do with this attack, some are asking if today’s political rhetoric is inspiring the lunatic fringe?”
— NBC’s Matt Lauer teasing an upcoming segment on Today, January 10, 2011.

- See more at: Jonah Goldberg Protecting the Protesters vs. Trashing the Tea Party
Good point!
 
These protest are now being led by Answer. the OWS, anarchist/communist, etc etc

This isn't anything about black lives matters anymore. people need to wake up and demand they be arrested for interfering with their daily lives
 

Forum List

Back
Top