Media Outlets Ordered To Destroy Trump

[Brynmr]

If Clinton is elected, this country will be ruins in her first term. That's not going to be a huge fall considering where we are now. We'll have far more debt, a continuation of awful health care, greater corruption and injustice at every level of government, much less freedoms and more terrorism in our cities. On the world stage we'll be a joke. This will likely delight the Left because they hate America anyway but I will feel sad for future generations suffering the results of the Whore's terrible policies.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It's war on Trump on orders from the Hillary Campaign:

Fox News host Bill O’Reilly believes that “at least three” media organizations “have ordered their employees to destroy” Donald Trump.

“It’s a complicated situation, but I think everyone can agree — except for the media organizations that now have ordered their employees to destroy Trump — there’s at least three of them,” O’Reilly said during an on-air interview Monday afternoon with colleague Bill Hemmer. “And, I can’t say who they are right now because I don’t have it nailed down, but I am 100 percent convinced.”

O’Reilly continued, “These media organizations have actually put out, ‘If you support Trump, your career is done.'”

Bill O'Reilly: Media Outlets 'Ordered Their Employees to Destroy' Donald Trump​

I don't believe for a moment that anyone has been "ordered" to do anything. That's not how it works.

There doesn't have to BE any "ordering". The overall media culture (particularly national media) is naturally liberal (with a few obvious exceptions) and they report accordingly.

Reporting objectively and completely are simply no longer priorities. At least 85% of the national media loathes Trump and they feel little obligation to hide it.

"Orders" would be an unnecessary redundancy.
.

So you're saying that most people in journalism aren't being ordered to do this? They're willingly part of one fraud after another?
I think that the media bosses are taking orders from the Hillary campaign. That's the way it works in all dictatorships. Dictators take over the media by putting their friend in charge, then they issue orders to them. The people that work for them have a choice, get with the program or look for another job. Competition for those jobs is so heavy that anyone can be replaced if they don't follow orders.
I used to be a Journalism major. There are thousands of people waiting for jobs in the media. Screw up and you're gone. One of my professors was a Producer for Channel 8 in San Diego, and he said media is a dog eat dog business. He pissed off the wrong person and lost his job. Don't bother being in journalism if you're a true conservative because they won't give you a chance. You have to think the same way and go to the same schools to be part of the club.

I agree. I was in it for 18 years.

It's not a "conspiracy" or something that is planned or ordered or organized. It's simply built in to the culture, it's all a given. Yes, there are plenty of smirks and catty comments and (especially) insults, but the ideology is just a part of the foundation, and (importantly) OPINIONS from the ideology are treated as FACTS.

Further, and this is something I've discussed in "real life" with many, there is a phrase I can tell you I heard at least once or twice a week throughout my career: "The public is stupid". They have little regard for those who are as uninformed and ill-educated and intellectually stunted as "the public".

And yes, I'd say that during my time I knew three (3) strong conservatives. I can still freakin' picture each one of them.
.

They public has to be stupid to fall for the medias bull shit. But I think it's more to do with them having lives and not getting involved or at least informed.

In the South, the lower the education level the more they vote Democrat. In the North East being a liberal is just what you are. Being synical and having a rotten attitude makes you more closed minded and more easily manipulated by emotional issues rather than rational issues.

Participating in the pot threads, it's easy to see how the leftists are so duped. They mentally incapacitate themselves with chemicals. Many leftists are potheads and potheads can't think clearly, nor can they follow a chain of logic to its inevitable conclusion. Venezuela is full of potheads and they elected a communist government. Look what's happening to them now. This war is not just between the takers and the producers, it's between the medicated and the clear minded.

 

[Roudy]

In truth, the American press sold their souls in the 60s....they just came out into the open this year.....

In truth, Trump is losing. Badly. And you're ilk are scrambling for excuses to absolve Trump and the GOP of any responsibility for the outcome of his own campaign.

When you have to frontload excuses for pathetic failure a month before the election, things clearly haven't gone the way you imagined they would, eh?

And your ilk has absolved Hillary of all the corruption, lies, fraud, and criminal behavior as exposed by the wiki leaks emails.

The FBI has already investigated Hillary. They found nothing criminal. No one ever has.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to embellish his already ludicriously complicated and laughably implausible conspiracy horseshit as a pathetic excuse for his own incompetent campaign and inept leadership.

Ha ha ha. A corrupt Administration and a corrupt candidate conspired with various department heads not to press charges. Wot a surprise! Maybe Bill did talk about his grandchildren and golf for 40 minutes in the back of the plane with the attorney general a few days before the decision? What fools!

Now who am I to believe? The director of the FBI James Comey.....or some schmo off the internet who insists that he knows better?

Sorry, slick...but our sources are not equal.

Why don't you review the wiki leak emails and get back to us. Especially the part where they conspire to screw Sanders, kiss Wall Street and big bank's asses, and wanting to create all out open borders and free trade surrendering the sovereignty and security of this country.

Why don't you make your own argument and back it with evidence rather than alluding to claims you clearly can't back up?

As I can back up every claim I make about Mr. 'Grab them by the *****"

Believe Hillary's own words, she said she didn't send or receive classified emails, she did. She said to the parents of the Ben Ghazi victims that it was a protest based on a video that killed their loved ones, it wasn't. The list goes on.

 

[Roudy]

I don't believe for a moment that anyone has been "ordered" to do anything. That's not how it works.

There doesn't have to BE any "ordering". The overall media culture (particularly national media) is naturally liberal (with a few obvious exceptions) and they report accordingly.

Reporting objectively and completely are simply no longer priorities. At least 85% of the national media loathes Trump and they feel little obligation to hide it.

"Orders" would be an unnecessary redundancy.

Well somebody decides what to air. FOX reported this morning the networks are spending on average 9 minutes on allegations on Trump's bad behavior with women to 30 seconds on Hillary/Democrat wikileaks, which involves corruption at the highest levels of government.

Only a handful of corporations own the media outlets and they obvious like the way things are since they are gobbling up wealth like black holes. So yes, there's a culture downstream but the bosses call the shots.

After devoting 23 hours non stop of attacks and gossip about Trump. They sneak in a few minutes about the emails, only to say "if it weren't for us creating this story about Trump and blaberring and attacking him for hours, we should actually be talking about the emails". Yup. LOL.

 

[Roudy]

The media gave Trump over a billion dollars worth of free campaign advertisement and Trump welcomed and manipulated every second of it....the problem with ego's is that they grow and because of this growth, Trump believed as he once said, he could stand in the middle of street shoot a man and still get votes....so its only fitting to see that what created this monster, see that it's destroyed and its not the media....its Trumps ego...this guy is on a mission of self destruction, he doesn't want to be president, never did and you nuts need to come to terms with this....otherwise he'd get focus, listen to his people and become a better candidate...instead of running around the country defending shit that has no defense to it.

Yeah, the media made sure Trump is the nominee because the other ones would have kicked Hillary's ass. but it looks like they may have miscalculated. Rasmussen has Trump leading nationally by two, this is after the debate and the so called "bombshell" audio tape.

LOLOLO....any poll from a right winged org. is rendered...useless....next?

Funny how the left quotes the same polls when it favors Hillary, eh? Ha ha ha.

 

[JimBowie1958]

CNN: Clinton 57 percent; Trump 34 percent

YouGov: Clinton 47 percent; Trump 42 percent

Morning Consult-Politico: Clinton 42 percent; Trump 28 percent

NBC-SurveyMonkey: Clinton 44 percent; Trump 34 percent

And those polls being all over the map giving Clinton anywhere from a 23 point lead to a mere 14% are completely worthless and you would know it if you weren't such a blow hard gas bag..

 

[JimBowie1958]

Exclusive: New Leak on Clinton's Cozy Press Relationship

Excellent post and most people have become aware of this other than the idiot Democrats.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Funny how that appeal to authority doesn't work on you potheads. I'm arguing with potheads in another thread that don't think pot is an hallucinogen even though the NIH lists it as such after scientific studies. Pothead denial vs the US government and science. It seems you all don't stick to expertise when it suits you.

All the same, pot is not nearly as harmful as alcohol.

It is way past time to legalize pot.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Funny how that appeal to authority doesn't work on you potheads. I'm arguing with potheads in another thread that don't think pot is an hallucinogen even though the NIH lists it as such after scientific studies. Pothead denial vs the US government and science. It seems you all don't stick to expertise when it suits you.

All the same, pot is not nearly as harmful as alcohol.

It is way past time to legalize pot.

Disagree. Still love you though.

 

[Roudy]

It's war on Trump on orders from the Hillary Campaign:

Fox News host Bill O’Reilly believes that “at least three” media organizations “have ordered their employees to destroy” Donald Trump.

“It’s a complicated situation, but I think everyone can agree — except for the media organizations that now have ordered their employees to destroy Trump — there’s at least three of them,” O’Reilly said during an on-air interview Monday afternoon with colleague Bill Hemmer. “And, I can’t say who they are right now because I don’t have it nailed down, but I am 100 percent convinced.”

O’Reilly continued, “These media organizations have actually put out, ‘If you support Trump, your career is done.'”

Bill O'Reilly: Media Outlets 'Ordered Their Employees to Destroy' Donald Trump​

I don't believe for a moment that anyone has been "ordered" to do anything. That's not how it works.

There doesn't have to BE any "ordering". The overall media culture (particularly national media) is naturally liberal (with a few obvious exceptions) and they report accordingly.

Reporting objectively and completely are simply no longer priorities. At least 85% of the national media loathes Trump and they feel little obligation to hide it.

"Orders" would be an unnecessary redundancy.
.

So you're saying that most people in journalism aren't being ordered to do this? They're willingly part of one fraud after another?
I think that the media bosses are taking orders from the Hillary campaign. That's the way it works in all dictatorships. Dictators take over the media by putting their friend in charge, then they issue orders to them. The people that work for them have a choice, get with the program or look for another job. Competition for those jobs is so heavy that anyone can be replaced if they don't follow orders.
I used to be a Journalism major. There are thousands of people waiting for jobs in the media. Screw up and you're gone. One of my professors was a Producer for Channel 8 in San Diego, and he said media is a dog eat dog business. He pissed off the wrong person and lost his job. Don't bother being in journalism if you're a true conservative because they won't give you a chance. You have to think the same way and go to the same schools to be part of the club.

I agree. I was in it for 18 years.

It's not a "conspiracy" or something that is planned or ordered or organized. It's simply built in to the culture, it's all a given. Yes, there are plenty of smirks and catty comments and (especially) insults, but the ideology is just a part of the foundation, and (importantly) OPINIONS from the ideology are treated as FACTS.

Further, and this is something I've discussed in "real life" with many, there is a phrase I can tell you I heard at least once or twice a week throughout my career: "The public is stupid". They have little regard for those who are as uninformed and ill-educated and intellectually stunted as "the public".

And yes, I'd say that during my time I knew three (3) strong conservatives. I can still freakin' picture each one of them.
.

They public has to be stupid to fall for the medias bull shit. But I think it's more to do with them having lives and not getting involved or at least informed.

In the South, the lower the education level the more they vote Democrat. In the North East being a liberal is just what you are. Being synical and having a rotten attitude makes you more closed minded and more easily manipulated by emotional issues rather than rational issues.

Given the circumstances we face today, the main determining question is whether this the election where social media and other Internet news sources will overtake the traditional main stream media, that has totally abdicated its journalistic duty of impartiality, honesty, and objecitivy?

It appears that Trump is banking on the answer to that question to be a resounding yes.