- Aug 6, 2012
- 28,386
- 25,153
- 2,405
This guy is a comedian and his group is a joke, pretending that he is not trying to shut people down while clearly he is. If Angelo wants to take a polygraph exam and answers those questions I'm sure it could be arranged.
His rationale as explained on Smerconish just now, basically is that he lists these advertisers to make them aware of what they are supporting. Huh?
I read some of this conspiracy during the election and I don't follow it too closely. Hannity has brought people on his show asking some very strong questions about DNC actions after the event. Just as I hear the Dems and alt-left constantly attack Trump before and after his election, the conspiracies about Russia, threats that he is illegitimate and should be impeached, why shouldn't anyone speak their mind about another conspiracy (even if I personally don't follow such threads of yarn preferring to let authorities decide). At least he is trying to build the argument on his show by talking to those close to the case, not "unknown sources".
This group is listing advertisers of someone in an effort to silence Hannity via pressure on advertisers. Smerconish is absolutely right that he is having a problem accepting pressure on advertisers when this group can't reach the audience. If you don't like a show, change the channel snowflake, clearly his ratings show his fans still support him. Thankfully Smerconish is a far bigger supporter of free speech and expression than some others...
So-called progressive groups who want to apply pressure need to be held to the same standard for going after the president and spew anti-American ideology on CNN and MSNBC in particular. This group is so concerned about Hannity conspiracies but an entire year of investigation of Russia collusion has gone on and there is not one shred of evidence provided. Is this not the definition of a conspiracy?
His rationale as explained on Smerconish just now, basically is that he lists these advertisers to make them aware of what they are supporting. Huh?
I read some of this conspiracy during the election and I don't follow it too closely. Hannity has brought people on his show asking some very strong questions about DNC actions after the event. Just as I hear the Dems and alt-left constantly attack Trump before and after his election, the conspiracies about Russia, threats that he is illegitimate and should be impeached, why shouldn't anyone speak their mind about another conspiracy (even if I personally don't follow such threads of yarn preferring to let authorities decide). At least he is trying to build the argument on his show by talking to those close to the case, not "unknown sources".
This group is listing advertisers of someone in an effort to silence Hannity via pressure on advertisers. Smerconish is absolutely right that he is having a problem accepting pressure on advertisers when this group can't reach the audience. If you don't like a show, change the channel snowflake, clearly his ratings show his fans still support him. Thankfully Smerconish is a far bigger supporter of free speech and expression than some others...
So-called progressive groups who want to apply pressure need to be held to the same standard for going after the president and spew anti-American ideology on CNN and MSNBC in particular. This group is so concerned about Hannity conspiracies but an entire year of investigation of Russia collusion has gone on and there is not one shred of evidence provided. Is this not the definition of a conspiracy?
Last edited: