Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.How would you know that? Where does unrestrained capitalism exist? Where has it ever existed?Exactly what unrestrained capitalism does!They shit on the little guy every chance they had even through they used the little guy as useful idiots.
.
It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Simple Government. Free markets have no government and no government regulation.Mr. Deflector and Mr. Projector at the same time?You need a valid argument to make it stick, dear; simply getting the sergeant major general's office involved, means you are just a drama queen. And, drama quenery, is simply more expensive.
YOu are not saying anything sane enough to rebuttal.
I'm watching for a point to be addressed. Anytime you feel brave enough to make one.
I mean, you probably are afraid that I will crush it and you like a bug, and I probably will.
But, maybe you will learn something in the process.
Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.How would you know that? Where does unrestrained capitalism exist? Where has it ever existed?Exactly what unrestrained capitalism does!
.
It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
....
Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Simple Government. Free markets have no government and no government regulation.Mr. Deflector and Mr. Projector at the same time?YOu are not saying anything sane enough to rebuttal.
I'm watching for a point to be addressed. Anytime you feel brave enough to make one.
I mean, you probably are afraid that I will crush it and you like a bug, and I probably will.
But, maybe you will learn something in the process.
Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
Careful! The "perfection" in question is not derived from me or a personal mental construct of mine. Jesus Himself is quoted as setting the parameters for perfection. When men start to put their own spin on the Words of Christ, confusion is spawned.The rich man , seeking counsel from Jesus about attaining salvation, upon hearing the prerequisites turned away because he could not give up his wealth. And so it is today. Wealthy men have tried to modify the gospels of Jesus to meet their needs without having to sell ALL they have and give to the poor.Some of the more benevolent aspects of Socialist ldealogy was found in the teachings of Jesus Christ more than 2000 years beforewho invented European style communism?
another Jew updated those teachings sans the religiosity. Capitalists have served mammon well, embracing the love of money over the love of humanity. Name an evil that plagues the earth. At the root of that evil
Is the love of money. It matters not which socio economic paradigm is put to the test.
The evils of Capitalism or the evils of Communism come about when the greed of despots and oligarchs override the health and welfare of the masses over whom they govern.
Logically, a mixture of Socialism and Capitalism in the right measure is ideal.
Apparently large swaths of the American population has accepted that reality. These
citizens are middle of the road; and, they control the flow of political power between the two major parties with their uncommitted
voting patterns. I'm one of those...regardless of any labels you try to attach to me....
Yes Jesus had taught socialism and communism. But look at what He had done to the one that did not do what the others were doing. Socialism can only work if corporations and politicians were doing their part as well as the others. But I see that Big Pharma will not create medicines just to help others rather than for a large profit. Everyone has to be willing to work for other for free, as if they are their own family. As the same way parents works for their own Children for free.But nobody doesn't want to help thy neighbor.
Acts 4:32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.
33 With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all 34 that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales 35 and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.
36 Joseph, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (which means “son of encouragement”), 37 sold a field he owned and brought the money and put it at the apostles’ feet.
Acts 5:1 Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2 With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
3 Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? 4 Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
5 When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened. 6 Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him.
Matthew 20:9 “The workers who were hired about five in the afternoon came and each received a denarius. 10 So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. 11 When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. 12 ‘These who were hired last worked only one hour,’ they said, ‘and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.’
13 “But he answered one of them, ‘I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? 14 Take your pay and go. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. 15 Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’
16 “So the last will be first, and the first will be last.”
There is nothing in scriptures that said Jesus the forcible redistribution of wealth by political authorities.
Some are indeed generous...but that is not perfection until they sell ALL they have and give to the poor...according to the words of the bible said to be those of JESUS.
Will not disagree with most of that other than we're still not perfect if we give up everything. Striving for perfection is the key.
Communist:friend: That wasn't REAL Communism, try again!
why in this case "Communism"always kills ?Me: Communism has killed 94 million people...
"Communism" is an economic system. It doesn't "kill" anybody.
Armies kill people. Guns and bombs and rockets kill people. Murderers kill people. Economic systems preeeeety much provide a framework for how wealth moves around. That's all they do.
Comparison and contrast.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.How would you know that? Where does unrestrained capitalism exist? Where has it ever existed?
.
It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
....
So, why the obsession with pure Free Market Capitalism?
Yes, it does.Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Simple Government. Free markets have no government and no government regulation.Mr. Deflector and Mr. Projector at the same time?
I'm watching for a point to be addressed. Anytime you feel brave enough to make one.
I mean, you probably are afraid that I will crush it and you like a bug, and I probably will.
But, maybe you will learn something in the process.
Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
No, it does not.
The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: maximizing employment, stabilizing prices, and moderating long-term interest rates.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.How would you know that? Where does unrestrained capitalism exist? Where has it ever existed?Exactly what unrestrained capitalism does!
.
It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
I am on the left. Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment only exists to bail out Capitalists.
There is no unemployment only underpayment under truer forms of Capitalism.
Comparison and contrast.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
....
So, why the obsession with pure Free Market Capitalism?
Yes, it does.Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Simple Government. Free markets have no government and no government regulation.I'm watching for a point to be addressed. Anytime you feel brave enough to make one.
I mean, you probably are afraid that I will crush it and you like a bug, and I probably will.
But, maybe you will learn something in the process.
Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
No, it does not.
The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: maximizing employment, stabilizing prices, and moderating long-term interest rates.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
I did. You are simply full of fallacy.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.How would you know that? Where does unrestrained capitalism exist? Where has it ever existed?
.
It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
I am on the left. Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment only exists to bail out Capitalists.
There is no unemployment only underpayment under truer forms of Capitalism.
You really are in the dark on how economic systems work. Id suggest a Eco101 for dummies to start.
Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.Comparison and contrast.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
....
So, why the obsession with pure Free Market Capitalism?
With what?
Fixing fiscal policy so that the Fed can follow up with monetary policy is, command economics.Yes, it does.Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Simple Government. Free markets have no government and no government regulation.
Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
No, it does not.
The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: maximizing employment, stabilizing prices, and moderating long-term interest rates.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
They did not SET prices as they would have in a command economy.
They were trying to steer the economy with the limited controls they have, because we are NOT a command economy.
I did. You are simply full of fallacy.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.It's great!
They cite Free Markets and Unrestrained Capitalism all the time,
but you if have a complaint about Communism, then True Communism has never existed!
Calling it a double standard doesn't really convey the epic level of hypocrisy.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
I am on the left. Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment only exists to bail out Capitalists.
There is no unemployment only underpayment under truer forms of Capitalism.
You really are in the dark on how economic systems work. Id suggest a Eco101 for dummies to start.
Fixing fiscal policy so that the Fed can follow up with monetary policy is, command economics.Yes, it does.Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.Your desire to limit capitalism to pure form Free Markets is noted and rejected.
A well regulated market can gather large portions of the productivity and efficiency of theoretical Free Markets.
As evidenced by the rise of the American economy over the last 300 years.
No, it does not.
The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: maximizing employment, stabilizing prices, and moderating long-term interest rates.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
They did not SET prices as they would have in a command economy.
They were trying to steer the economy with the limited controls they have, because we are NOT a command economy.
Micromanaging our tax codes, is pure, command economics.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
There is no unemployment only underpayment under truer forms of Capitalism.I did. You are simply full of fallacy.Somalia had an example of an AnCap. It lasted around three years.
Anarco-capitalism? Did it?
Or was it warlordism and tribalism?
Do you think a minimum wage can be part of capitalism?
Sure, just another form of regulation.
I am on the left. Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment only exists to bail out Capitalists.
There is no unemployment only underpayment under truer forms of Capitalism.
You really are in the dark on how economic systems work. Id suggest a Eco101 for dummies to start.
Obviously, it didnt. Perhaps a remedial junior high level eco class might help you.
only the right wing has nothing but appeals to ignorance.Fixing fiscal policy so that the Fed can follow up with monetary policy is, command economics.Yes, it does.Regulating Commerce is a power delegated to Congress. Simply having a Central Bank means we have a command economy economy.
No, it does not.
The U.S. Congress established three key objectives for monetary policy in the Federal Reserve Act: maximizing employment, stabilizing prices, and moderating long-term interest rates.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System
They did not SET prices as they would have in a command economy.
They were trying to steer the economy with the limited controls they have, because we are NOT a command economy.
Micromanaging our tax codes, is pure, command economics.
Only the right wing, never gets it.
You have no clue of what command economics is.
