McDonalds Introduces Self Serving Kiosks in Response to Min Wage Increase

[danielpalos]

too lazy to make like Henry Ford; but, "blame the poor" anyway. i got it.

When the poor are the cause of their own bad situations, they deserve the blame. Got it?

how many capitalists can double wages and achieve gains from efficiency?

why blame the poor, for not doing any better.

Why would someone double wages when he wagers they're already forced to pay for certain jobs is more than the job is worth based on the skills to do it?

In most cases, the poor are poor because they choose not to do any better.

Henry Ford chose to do better, why don't all captialists, emulate the example of Henry Ford, and realize gains from efficiency.

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

 

[hadit]

No, the right expects people to do their best, not to do less and expect society to make up the difference.

just right wing fantasy; promoting the general welfare is in our Constitution.

It is not promoting the general welfare to pay people who can work but choose not to.

equal protection of the law is promoting the general welfare.

Then Bill Gates should get food stamps.

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

 

[hadit]

When the poor are the cause of their own bad situations, they deserve the blame. Got it?

how many capitalists can double wages and achieve gains from efficiency?

why blame the poor, for not doing any better.

Why would someone double wages when he wagers they're already forced to pay for certain jobs is more than the job is worth based on the skills to do it?

In most cases, the poor are poor because they choose not to do any better.

Henry Ford chose to do better, why don't all captialists, emulate the example of Henry Ford, and realize gains from efficiency.

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

 

[danielpalos]

just right wing fantasy; promoting the general welfare is in our Constitution.

It is not promoting the general welfare to pay people who can work but choose not to.

equal protection of the law is promoting the general welfare.

Then Bill Gates should get food stamps.

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

 

[danielpalos]

how many capitalists can double wages and achieve gains from efficiency?

why blame the poor, for not doing any better.

Why would someone double wages when he wagers they're already forced to pay for certain jobs is more than the job is worth based on the skills to do it?

In most cases, the poor are poor because they choose not to do any better.

Henry Ford chose to do better, why don't all captialists, emulate the example of Henry Ford, and realize gains from efficiency.

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

 

[hadit]

It is not promoting the general welfare to pay people who can work but choose not to.

equal protection of the law is promoting the general welfare.

Then Bill Gates should get food stamps.

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

 

[hadit]

Why would someone double wages when he wagers they're already forced to pay for certain jobs is more than the job is worth based on the skills to do it?

In most cases, the poor are poor because they choose not to do any better.

Henry Ford chose to do better, why don't all captialists, emulate the example of Henry Ford, and realize gains from efficiency.

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

 

[danielpalos]

equal protection of the law is promoting the general welfare.

Then Bill Gates should get food stamps.

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

 

[danielpalos]

Henry Ford chose to do better, why don't all captialists, emulate the example of Henry Ford, and realize gains from efficiency.

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

 

[hadit]

Then Bill Gates should get food stamps.

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

Employment IS at will. Unemployment compensation, though, IS means tested, and should be.

 

[hadit]

Are you STILL going on about that, even after I've nuked it three ways to Sunday?

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

 

[danielpalos]

it is means tested, so he won't qualify; any other diversions?

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

Employment IS at will. Unemployment compensation, though, IS means tested, and should be.

The only "means testing" is whether or not the employment was at-will, and not for-cause.

 

[danielpalos]

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

you are simply lost, with no answers. you can't do it, why blame the poor.

 

[hadit]

Sorry, means testing is not equal protection of the law. Please try again.

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

Employment IS at will. Unemployment compensation, though, IS means tested, and should be.

The only "means testing" is whether or not the employment was at-will, and not for-cause.

You are simply wrong. You've been clinging desperately to a myth.

 

[hadit]

Stick a fork in it, you lost that gambit a long time ago. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, hoping for a different result. Just stop now.

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

you are simply lost, with no answers. you can't do it, why blame the poor.

Here's the thing. I don't blame the poor, and I don't blame corporations that are surviving on very small profit margins. You keep asking why all corporations don't double their labor costs overnight the way Ford did, and I've answered that question repeatedly.

Here, I'll ask you a question. Why don't we just raise the MW to $100/hr and eliminate poverty altogether?

 

[danielpalos]

welfare should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough. socialism at its best.

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

Employment IS at will. Unemployment compensation, though, IS means tested, and should be.

The only "means testing" is whether or not the employment was at-will, and not for-cause.

You are simply wrong. You've been clinging desperately to a myth.

i am not wrong; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

 

[danielpalos]

no dear; you only appeal to ignorance. you have no valid rebuttal to this argument.

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

you are simply lost, with no answers. you can't do it, why blame the poor.

Here's the thing. I don't blame the poor, and I don't blame corporations that are surviving on very small profit margins. You keep asking why all corporations don't double their labor costs overnight the way Ford did, and I've answered that question repeatedly.

Here, I'll ask you a question. Why don't we just raise the MW to $100/hr and eliminate poverty altogether?

nice evasion; how does that work for the poor? capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment. labor has a good excuse.

in any Case, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour by comparison, that is the reason for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.

why not ask Congress for a capital bailout via the corporate tax codes, whenever capitalists don't have what it takes, to make like Henry Ford.

 

[hadit]

By the same token, UE is means tested, ie, you have to meet certain criteria in order to get it. THAT is reality.

employment is at will; there is no "means testing".

Employment IS at will. Unemployment compensation, though, IS means tested, and should be.

The only "means testing" is whether or not the employment was at-will, and not for-cause.

You are simply wrong. You've been clinging desperately to a myth.

i am not wrong; there is no appeal to ignorance of the law.

Then why do you repeat things that are wrong?

 

[hadit]

I've not only rebutted it, I've destroyed it, many times.

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

you are simply lost, with no answers. you can't do it, why blame the poor.

Here's the thing. I don't blame the poor, and I don't blame corporations that are surviving on very small profit margins. You keep asking why all corporations don't double their labor costs overnight the way Ford did, and I've answered that question repeatedly.

Here, I'll ask you a question. Why don't we just raise the MW to $100/hr and eliminate poverty altogether?

nice evasion; how does that work for the poor? capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment. labor has a good excuse.

in any Case, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour by comparison, that is the reason for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.

why not ask Congress for a capital bailout via the corporate tax codes, whenever capitalists don't have what it takes, to make like Henry Ford.

So welfare costs $14/hr. If society wants to guarantee a $14/hr income, then society needs to step up and make up the difference between the wage and the welfare standard. Don't turn businesses into welfare distribution centers.

 

[rightwinger]

Why blame the poor for not making like Henry Ford, if capitalists can't do it with their capital.

Just stop. You're lost in the weeds. Come to think of it, I think weeds are part of your problem.

you are simply lost, with no answers. you can't do it, why blame the poor.

Here's the thing. I don't blame the poor, and I don't blame corporations that are surviving on very small profit margins. You keep asking why all corporations don't double their labor costs overnight the way Ford did, and I've answered that question repeatedly.

Here, I'll ask you a question. Why don't we just raise the MW to $100/hr and eliminate poverty altogether?

nice evasion; how does that work for the poor? capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment. labor has a good excuse.

in any Case, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour by comparison, that is the reason for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage.

why not ask Congress for a capital bailout via the corporate tax codes, whenever capitalists don't have what it takes, to make like Henry Ford.

So welfare costs $14/hr. If society wants to guarantee a $14/hr income, then society needs to step up and make up the difference between the wage and the welfare standard. Don't turn businesses into welfare distribution centers.

Pay a wage where your workers don't have to go on welfare