This argument right here is part of why Trump's pushing tariffs. He believes that it'll entice folks to buy from American companies if the foreign companies are made to charge more. It's like... the "buy American" (or "buy <state>") campaigns on steroids.
I'm kinda whatever on it all personally. I'm more a "national" free trade person than just free trade. I think we have every right to fight for American businesses to make as much profit from foreign sales as the foreign businesses make off american sales. Especially if the goal is to bring businesses back to America. If Trump hits the margins right businesses will have to choose between national economies as to where they base; and America will win that battle - which means more business tax dollars to our gov and more jobs for our peeps. Yes, there'll be a slight adjustment on prices, but I don't think that increase outweighs the, albeit hopeful, benefits to America when all is said and done.
I agree but I don't know if forcing the American people to buy American products is all that American. I would like to see a change in the American consumer; something along the lines of education on how other countries maintain their labor force by buying their own products.
In some ways we are the most generous country in the world, in other ways we are the most selfish. It's like we are mesmerized by getting goods at the lowest price no matter who suffers for it. I would like to see all products sold in this country have a huge stamp on the package saying where it was made. Nobody even looks at that when they go shopping. All they look at is the price.
That can work only as long as the product was entirely made in one country. Look into what it takes to produce a pencil. Products from around the world are combined to make it. The stamp on the package would be as big as the pencil itself.
In today's world, there are very few products that can truly claim to be made in any one country.
Basically, you can only say that final assembly was done in a certain country, and boycotting products assembled in a certain country could end up impacting another that contributed parts.
Let's say for example that you want to boycott toys assembled in China. What about the countries that produced the plastics used, or the presses that give the toys their shape? How about the paint suppliers? If those products are produced in another country, you're impacting them as well.
That's true, but even if part or most of it was made in the USA, that's a big help. As for buying products overseas to produce, that shouldn't be a problem either. If consumers are boycotting your product for that reason, get American suppliers.
I always try to buy American when possible. I don't go to self checkouts. I'm heading for grocery shopping right now, and I won't step foot in a self checkout line. I'll wait the extra time and have a cashier check me out. It keeps them working. I'm willing to pay a little more for my doughnuts to make sure somebody else has a job.
It's nice you do that, but you aren't costing the economy a job. The way to maximize jobs is economic efficiency. I realize people like putting a face to a job. You see a cashier, and that's a person to you. Knowing that saving an economically inefficient job costs more than a job is harder to envision when you can't put faces to those jobs. But it's true, it does.
That said, I'm not saying to use the automated lines. You're a good guy, you like people. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you probably enjoy meeting the cashier and feeling you are helping them. And you are. Which means you value the extra amount you're paying. You get something for it. So for you to do that is money well spent.
Similarly, if you value the personal interaction of buying a lamp from a downtown store and want to have a downtown store over Amazon, it's right for you to do that. If enough people value downtown stores, they will stay open. You're paying for something you value and are therefore getting your money's worth, that is always the optimal way to spend money. But it still doesn't create net jobs.
All I'm saying is that you're not net saving jobs. It's just not economic reality
Sure you are. If they install five self serve machines for checkout, that's five people that have been replaced by a machine. If not for those machines, the store would need five people to service their customers.
We just don't have the "all for one and one for all" mentality anymore in this country. I remember years ago when a union store would go on strike. Just about nobody shopped there. It wasn't out of fear, it was out of solidarity with their fellow American workers. They knew pressuring the store to pay their workers more meant higher prices, but people were willing to pay those prices.
Back in the early 80's I went to do some last minute Christmas shopping. Nobody had the gift I was looking for except for this new discount store. When you went into the store, you had to look through their catalog, write down the item number and description, take that to the checkout and pay for it, then you stood in line behind the counter where employees on the other side were picking the merchandise off of the conveyer belt. It took forever.
Anyway there was this elderly gentleman looking at the chaos and shaking his head back and forth. He caught me staring and felt a need to explain. He said that in Europe, nobody cares about cheap, people care about quality. If you had a baseball, it was the best baseball money could buy. Over here he said, nobody cares about a good product. People in America want six cheap baseballs instead of just one good baseball. He said I love America. My daughter moved here and became an American. My grandchildren are American, but trust me, if your country continues in this direction, you will have serious problems later on.