McConnell Cannot Block Witnesses - Just Announced

[iceberg]

You are on the side making up shit and rules as you go.

You are n the side that made up RUSSIA, falsified evidence, lied to get warrants, lied about Kavanaugh...

And you have the SACK to say you are after the TRUTH???


God damn that some funny shit right there.

All I ever wanted was to hear from witnesses. Why does that anger you?

We wanted the same. We wanted to hear from the whistleblower--denied by Schiff. We wanted to hear from the informant. We wanted to hear from the 18th witness, schiff suppressed that testimony. But now you want to call foul???

The whistleblower and the IG are not witnesses.

if the whistleblower didn't witness the crime, what the holy fuck are people doing listening to him?

god damn you outstupid yourself far too often.

Because when the IG started looking at the things the whistleblower says he heard about, they turned out to be true.

You really aren’t very well informed.

bwahahahahahahahahahahaha

dude who hates trump: hey - i saw some shit.
dude who also hates trump: wow - it's true!!!

if he started all this shit, he's about the best witness you can call. get over your serious dearth of defenses.

 

[iceberg]

The Senate did do their job. This was a bogus impeachment that had no supporting evidence to their claim. In spite of that, they impeached the President anyway. Could you imagine if this happened outside of government in a court of law; somebody going to prison because another person thought they were going to rob a bank? It's unheard of.

There is nothing more to add to this impeachment. The Senators found the impeachment to be phony, and with that, Trump is not guilty of anything.

No supporting evidence? Then why is the Trump team legal argument now “it doesn’t matter if the allegations are true”.

Ever hear of a trial where no witnesses could be called? It’s an appealing farce of justice.

then why didn't the democrats call them when they had their turn?

it's an appalling show of stupidity.

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

 

[iceberg]

Let me clarify for the English-impaired: there's no supporting evidence that Trump did anything impeachable, and since the allegations aren't about impeachable offenses, it doesn't matter if they're true or not.

And yes, I have heard of courts dismissing charges because the prosecution doesn't have a sufficient case. But one rarely hears of a prosecution doing such a shit job of preparing a case before bringing charges. That IS a pretty appalling farce of justice with the "impeachment".

And now we know that it’s perfect okay for the President to send the government after his political enemies solely because they’re political enemies.

Send the government? That's what DumBama did--not Trump. Trump sent his personal lawyer to look at what was going on.

Biden was not his rival, and still isn't today. Maybe the only reason he decided to run was to try and get some protection from something like this. It's probably well known among the top members of the party. When you get your son a job at a corrupt company, in a corrupt country, and he gets wealthy, of course that should be looked at. It's not like Hunter is a genius or a stand up guy. He's a drug addict who owed back taxes to the IRS, and certainly not nearly a top lawyer in the US. Of course it's suspicious.

Tell me, what did “Dum-Bama” do exactly?

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

damn dude - you're a huge vocal circle jerk.

 

[colfax_m]

And now we know that it’s perfect okay for the President to send the government after his political enemies solely because they’re political enemies.

Send the government? That's what DumBama did--not Trump. Trump sent his personal lawyer to look at what was going on.

Biden was not his rival, and still isn't today. Maybe the only reason he decided to run was to try and get some protection from something like this. It's probably well known among the top members of the party. When you get your son a job at a corrupt company, in a corrupt country, and he gets wealthy, of course that should be looked at. It's not like Hunter is a genius or a stand up guy. He's a drug addict who owed back taxes to the IRS, and certainly not nearly a top lawyer in the US. Of course it's suspicious.

Tell me, what did “Dum-Bama” do exactly?

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

So you're saying it's okay when the commies do it but not the other party. Hypocrisy much? There was no corruption because the guy wasn't elected yet. It had nothing to do with corruption, it had to do with using government agencies to stop a political opponent. Ears knew that if Hillary didn't win, all his so-called accomplishments would go right down the drain, and most of them did.

You keep saying Trump was a political opponent. That’s false. They weren’t running against each other.

Obama was doing it for the benefit of the country. Trump was running for President. That’s a really big deal.

 

[iceberg]

Send the government? That's what DumBama did--not Trump. Trump sent his personal lawyer to look at what was going on.

Biden was not his rival, and still isn't today. Maybe the only reason he decided to run was to try and get some protection from something like this. It's probably well known among the top members of the party. When you get your son a job at a corrupt company, in a corrupt country, and he gets wealthy, of course that should be looked at. It's not like Hunter is a genius or a stand up guy. He's a drug addict who owed back taxes to the IRS, and certainly not nearly a top lawyer in the US. Of course it's suspicious.

Tell me, what did “Dum-Bama” do exactly?

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

So you're saying it's okay when the commies do it but not the other party. Hypocrisy much? There was no corruption because the guy wasn't elected yet. It had nothing to do with corruption, it had to do with using government agencies to stop a political opponent. Ears knew that if Hillary didn't win, all his so-called accomplishments would go right down the drain, and most of them did.

You keep saying Trump was a political opponent. That’s false. They weren’t running against each other.

Obama was doing it for the benefit of the country. Trump was running for President. That’s a really big deal.

and this is nothing but 100% opinion because you don't know either of these guys, just taking marching orders for your side.

 

[colfax_m]

No supporting evidence? Then why is the Trump team legal argument now “it doesn’t matter if the allegations are true”.

Ever hear of a trial where no witnesses could be called? It’s an appealing farce of justice.

then why didn't the democrats call them when they had their turn?

it's an appalling show of stupidity.

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Before I change my mind about not trying to be polite with you. I’m trying, really am. Unfortunately I’ve found that people are more likely to respond when you act like a jerk to them, which is unfortunate. I really try to resist that urge. I’m not always successful. You want me to continue trying to be polite, I suggest you try harder yourself.

Dems called many witnesses that never showed up. They subpoenaed many documents and none were submitted. That’s not a talking point. That’s a fact.

 

[skookerasbil]

I didn't even think they grew big bumpy cucumbers up in Alaska. But evidently they do and the Senator from that state just dealt the DUMS a serious hot and stingy Super Bowl weekend. Make sure to change the menu's for Super Bowl Sunday from wings to milkshakes.. Just trying to do my part here.....

 

[colfax_m]

Tell me, what did “Dum-Bama” do exactly?

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

So you're saying it's okay when the commies do it but not the other party. Hypocrisy much? There was no corruption because the guy wasn't elected yet. It had nothing to do with corruption, it had to do with using government agencies to stop a political opponent. Ears knew that if Hillary didn't win, all his so-called accomplishments would go right down the drain, and most of them did.

You keep saying Trump was a political opponent. That’s false. They weren’t running against each other.

Obama was doing it for the benefit of the country. Trump was running for President. That’s a really big deal.

and this is nothing but 100% opinion because you don't know either of these guys, just taking marching orders for your side.

I’m engaging in a parody of excuses given for Trump’s behavior.

You see, many Trump supporters spent years complaining about the government investigating Trump’s campaign. Now that Trump is trying to get Biden investigated, it no longer seems to matter. I’m applying the excuses given by Trump supporters (which I think are poor excuses) and seeing if they’re okay with how they sound when applied to Trump.

So far it’s going as planned.

 

[iceberg]

then why didn't the democrats call them when they had their turn?

it's an appalling show of stupidity.

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Before I change my mind about not trying to be polite with you. I’m trying, really am. Unfortunately I’ve found that people are more likely to respond when you act like a jerk to them, which is unfortunate. I really try to resist that urge. I’m not always successful. You want me to continue trying to be polite, I suggest you try harder yourself.

Dems called many witnesses that never showed up. They subpoenaed many documents and none were submitted. That’s not a talking point. That’s a fact.

they should have called better witnesses. point being, they had their time to do this. ended the game early, then sat on it for how long again doing nothing but accusing the right of POTENTIALLY not going along with them?

they're running a shit circus and dude, it ain't my fault you got season tickets.

and wow. the restraint...

 

[eddiew]

No supporting evidence? Then why is the Trump team legal argument now “it doesn’t matter if the allegations are true”.

Ever hear of a trial where no witnesses could be called? It’s an appealing farce of justice.

then why didn't the democrats call them when they had their turn?

it's an appalling show of stupidity.

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Are you scared shitless of trump like senate republicans are?

 

[iceberg]

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

So you're saying it's okay when the commies do it but not the other party. Hypocrisy much? There was no corruption because the guy wasn't elected yet. It had nothing to do with corruption, it had to do with using government agencies to stop a political opponent. Ears knew that if Hillary didn't win, all his so-called accomplishments would go right down the drain, and most of them did.

You keep saying Trump was a political opponent. That’s false. They weren’t running against each other.

Obama was doing it for the benefit of the country. Trump was running for President. That’s a really big deal.

and this is nothing but 100% opinion because you don't know either of these guys, just taking marching orders for your side.

I’m engaging in a parody of excuses given for Trump’s behavior.

You see, many Trump supporters spent years complaining about the government investigating Trump’s campaign. Now that Trump is trying to get Biden investigated, it no longer seems to matter. I’m applying the excuses given by Trump supporters (which I think are poor excuses) and seeing if they’re okay with how they sound when applied to Trump.

So far it’s going as planned.

fyi - you keep mistake my supporting our laws as written as supporting trump.

there really is a difference, dude.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I'm not sure I understand. It seems that the democrats helped Trump out by not going through
the process of subpoenaing the witnesses they needed to make their case. Instead, they buttoned
it up too early and demanded that the repubs do their work for them. The dems have nobody to blame
but themselves. You need to work on focusing your anger at the right group of people.

Nothing they did helped Trump. They wore his legal team down to the “so what” defense. Alexander doesn’t want Bolton to testify because what he is going to say has already been proven.

I have no anger for anyone that did everything they could to get the truth out.

No, the dems did not do everything they could to get the truth out. They cut corners and tried to get
the Senate to do the work they should have done. I'm not sure why you are defending them
as you are. The dems feet are the ones who's feet should be held to the fire.

You have any idea how long it would take to get the lawsuits through the court? McGhan’s lawsuit has a single ruling in district court and that was like 8 months ago. This will take years and I have little doubt they will be taking these to court now. Nothing was lost by going an alternative route.

The Senate should have called witnesses during the trial. The House can’t do that. They weren’t asking the Senate to do their job for them. They were asking the Senate to do the job the Constitution gives them.

Excuse me? The House can't call witnesses? What the fuck do you think the House was DOING during the impeachment process? The Constitution does NOT mandate that the Senate do the investigating for the House.

The House can’t call witnesses at the trial. Good lord, did you actually read ?

Good Lord, do you actually think? The House called and heard witnesses during their big sham "investigation". Those testimonies were part of the impeachment managers' presentation to the Senate.

The only thing the House can't do is force the Senate to do their investigatory job by calling EVEN MORE witnesses, which the House didn't bother to call before.

If the House wanted to present extra witness testimony to the Senate, they should have tended to that before now.

 

[iceberg]

then why didn't the democrats call them when they had their turn?

it's an appalling show of stupidity.

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Are you scared shitless of trump like senate republicans are?

come back when you can make sense.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You are on the side making up shit and rules as you go.

You are n the side that made up RUSSIA, falsified evidence, lied to get warrants, lied about Kavanaugh...

And you have the SACK to say you are after the TRUTH???


God damn that some funny shit right there.

All I ever wanted was to hear from witnesses. Why does that anger you?

Why do you ignore all the lies I just mentioned I've never seen you give a fuck about?

Im ignoring your attempts at deflection. That’s how you handle deflection. You ignore it.

If you had a good point to raise, I doubt you’d be whining about Rwussia.

No, that's how partisan TDS leftists handle truths they don't want to hear: they label it "deflection" and try to pretend running away scared is somehow principled.

Its a deflection. It’s completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

IF one accepts that the topic is "Trump is guilty, so just accept it!"

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Send the government? That's what DumBama did--not Trump. Trump sent his personal lawyer to look at what was going on.

Biden was not his rival, and still isn't today. Maybe the only reason he decided to run was to try and get some protection from something like this. It's probably well known among the top members of the party. When you get your son a job at a corrupt company, in a corrupt country, and he gets wealthy, of course that should be looked at. It's not like Hunter is a genius or a stand up guy. He's a drug addict who owed back taxes to the IRS, and certainly not nearly a top lawyer in the US. Of course it's suspicious.

Tell me, what did “Dum-Bama” do exactly?

Do you really think that all this FBI spying, surveillance warrants, FISA lies were unaware of by him? Of course he knew it and they likely got his blessing before they started. Now it's been discovered that he had a meeting with the suspected whistleblower and people from Ukraine in the White House, discussing how to stop Trump. You bet he was behind the entire thing.

Who cares? It’s not like Trump was his political opponent. He was just trying to root out corruption.

So you're saying it's okay when the commies do it but not the other party. Hypocrisy much? There was no corruption because the guy wasn't elected yet. It had nothing to do with corruption, it had to do with using government agencies to stop a political opponent. Ears knew that if Hillary didn't win, all his so-called accomplishments would go right down the drain, and most of them did.

You keep saying Trump was a political opponent. That’s false. They weren’t running against each other.

Obama was doing it for the benefit of the country. Trump was running for President. That’s a really big deal.

Trump promised that one of his first issues would be to eliminate Commie Care. That's the only thing Obama was noted for. He wanted a Trump defeat so that Hillary would protect his prize possession. He also knew our economy could do much better with lower taxes and regulations. You know, that magic wand Hussein talked about? He knew Trump had that magic wand.

 

[colfax_m]

They did call them. Are you accusing me of stupidity when you didn’t know this very basic fact?

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Before I change my mind about not trying to be polite with you. I’m trying, really am. Unfortunately I’ve found that people are more likely to respond when you act like a jerk to them, which is unfortunate. I really try to resist that urge. I’m not always successful. You want me to continue trying to be polite, I suggest you try harder yourself.

Dems called many witnesses that never showed up. They subpoenaed many documents and none were submitted. That’s not a talking point. That’s a fact.

they should have called better witnesses. point being, they had their time to do this. ended the game early, then sat on it for how long again doing nothing but accusing the right of POTENTIALLY not going along with them?

they're running a shit circus and dude, it ain't my fault you got season tickets.

and wow. the restraint...

They did call “better” witnesses. Those people refused to show up. So it went to trial. The Senate could have called them but they’d rather not. I guess they have no interest in hearing what happened.


Anyway, Dems will continue to fight Trump’s obstruction in court. Nothing was lost.

 

[Cecilie1200]

earth to rw idiots

Turtleboi is doing everything he can to push this impeachment through as fast as he can -

rw morons are yammeing "COURTS" which would tie it up for months on end -


yet again another case of "2 dipshits meeting" bang heads together and moan DDDDDUUUURRRRRR.

Fact-1 the president will be acquitted
Fact-2 even if the House Managers proved their case, the alleged "offenses" would not be serious enough to remove a sitting president
Fact-3 even if the House Managers got more witnesses and documents, Facts 1 & 2 would not change.

fact 4 - Trumpbots make up their own facts then parrot them.

Fact #1: Leftbots wouldn't know a fact if it crawled up their pants leg and bit them on the left ass cheek.

 

[colfax_m]

All I ever wanted was to hear from witnesses. Why does that anger you?

Why do you ignore all the lies I just mentioned I've never seen you give a fuck about?

Im ignoring your attempts at deflection. That’s how you handle deflection. You ignore it.

If you had a good point to raise, I doubt you’d be whining about Rwussia.

No, that's how partisan TDS leftists handle truths they don't want to hear: they label it "deflection" and try to pretend running away scared is somehow principled.

Its a deflection. It’s completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

IF one accepts that the topic is "Trump is guilty, so just accept it!"

The topic is witnesses at the impeachment trial. .

 

[iceberg]

if they called their witnesses what the fuck are they bitching about more for then? they should have done this then.

stop being intentionally an ass. it's bad when when you do it unintentionally.

Because the witnesses never showed up.

I’ve been more polite to you than you deserve. Wash your mouth out with soap before I change my mind.

before you change your mind about what?
whatever the democrats tell you what to think?
that i should wash my mouth out with soap?
to stop being polite?

you have a habit of not being very clear.

slap me on ignore. you do that and i'll stop hitting "show ignored content" and we'll both go get happy.

Before I change my mind about not trying to be polite with you. I’m trying, really am. Unfortunately I’ve found that people are more likely to respond when you act like a jerk to them, which is unfortunate. I really try to resist that urge. I’m not always successful. You want me to continue trying to be polite, I suggest you try harder yourself.

Dems called many witnesses that never showed up. They subpoenaed many documents and none were submitted. That’s not a talking point. That’s a fact.

they should have called better witnesses. point being, they had their time to do this. ended the game early, then sat on it for how long again doing nothing but accusing the right of POTENTIALLY not going along with them?

they're running a shit circus and dude, it ain't my fault you got season tickets.

and wow. the restraint...

They did call “better” witnesses. Those people refused to show up. So it went to trial. The Senate could have called them but they’d rather not. I guess they have no interest in hearing what happened.


Anyway, Dems will continue to fight Trump’s obstruction in court. Nothing was lost.

if nothing was lost why are you crying about it so hard?

and they called shit witnesses if they didn't even bother to show up and root out this most heinous crime.

 

[iceberg]

Why do you ignore all the lies I just mentioned I've never seen you give a fuck about?

Im ignoring your attempts at deflection. That’s how you handle deflection. You ignore it.

If you had a good point to raise, I doubt you’d be whining about Rwussia.

No, that's how partisan TDS leftists handle truths they don't want to hear: they label it "deflection" and try to pretend running away scared is somehow principled.

Its a deflection. It’s completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

IF one accepts that the topic is "Trump is guilty, so just accept it!"

The topic is witnesses at the impeachment trial. .

funny. from you it sounds like a lack of witnesses who show up at impeachment trials.