That is your hit list. None of them did anything illegal.
Matt Taibbi Says Russiagate Indictments Are Coming, Hillary Clinton May Be a Target
- Thread starter DonGlock26
- Start date
That is your hit list. None of them did anything illegal.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 91,732
- 38,748
- 2,250
Clapper committed perjury.
James Clapper's perjury, and why DC made men don't get charged for lying to Congress
In DC, perjury is not simply tolerated, it is rewarded. In a city of made men and women, nothing says loyalty quite as much as lying under oath.
www.usatoday.com
- Sep 16, 2012
- 75,401
- 72,473
- 3,605
That is the lie that the security state told the public, but it was never proven to be true.
More than likely it was a leak, not a hack, by the same folks that are now under indictment for this corruption.
Even Assange said as much when in reference to Seth Rich.
Who Hacked What?
Maté called the purported email hacking a “core allegation at the heart of Russiagate” that predated the collusion claims. After WikiLeaks published the trove of internal communications in the summer of 2016, Maté said Hillary Clinton’s campaign, through its contractor CrowdStrike, was the first to blame the Russians.He said the media ran with the accusation, and it was further endorsed with “high confidence” by the 2017 ICA that Russia hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks. And that theory has remained relatively unchallenged – until now.
“We all know by now that ‘collusion’ was a complete scam laundered through the Clinton campaign through Christopher Steele… but they have clung to the Russian email hacking allegation,” Maté explained. “And what we get now from Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification is that, in September of 2016… the FBI and the NSA, which are the two premier intelligence agencies that would be able to investigate this hack and leak allegation… had low confidence in the Russia hacking/leak allegation.”
But Maté said the public was never made aware of that. “That was suppressed,” he noted. “Instead… the Obama administration put out a report through Clapper, who was then heading the Office of Director of National Intelligence, and Jeh Johnson, who was heading Department of Homeland Security, on October 7… [saying], in the name of the intelligence community, they have ‘high confidence’ that Russia was behind the hacking of the DNC, suppressing what the FBI and the NSA had said.”
As Maté explained, that suppression continued after the election and the FBI and NSA findings were further buried by the 2017 ICA. “Someone might argue… what if the U.S. got new intelligence after the FBI and NSA first made that low confidence assessment? Well, now we know from the declassified [House] report… that basically no new intelligence was collected after the election, that most of the intelligence that went into the ICA was collected before the election,” he noted. “[That] means at the time that the FBI and the NSA made their low confidence assessment that Russia hacked the DNC, no new evidence was collected after that to change their minds.”
New Questions Emerge About Whether Russia Actually Hacked DNC and Clinton Campaign Emails in 2016
Megyn and Aaron Maté discuss what we are now learning about Russia's alleged involvement in 2016 Democrat email hacking.
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
www.aaronmate.net
Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 91,732
- 38,748
- 2,250
That is the lie that the security state told the public, but it was never proven to be true.
More than likely it was a leak, not a hack, by the same folks that are now under indictment for this corruption.
Even Assange said as much when in reference to Seth Rich.
Who Hacked What?
Maté called the purported email hacking a “core allegation at the heart of Russiagate” that predated the collusion claims. After WikiLeaks published the trove of internal communications in the summer of 2016, Maté said Hillary Clinton’s campaign, through its contractor CrowdStrike, was the first to blame the Russians.
He said the media ran with the accusation, and it was further endorsed with “high confidence” by the 2017 ICA that Russia hacked the DNC and gave the emails to Wikileaks. And that theory has remained relatively unchallenged – until now.
“We all know by now that ‘collusion’ was a complete scam laundered through the Clinton campaign through Christopher Steele… but they have clung to the Russian email hacking allegation,” Maté explained. “And what we get now from Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification is that, in September of 2016… the FBI and the NSA, which are the two premier intelligence agencies that would be able to investigate this hack and leak allegation… had low confidence in the Russia hacking/leak allegation.”
But Maté said the public was never made aware of that. “That was suppressed,” he noted. “Instead… the Obama administration put out a report through Clapper, who was then heading the Office of Director of National Intelligence, and Jeh Johnson, who was heading Department of Homeland Security, on October 7… [saying], in the name of the intelligence community, they have ‘high confidence’ that Russia was behind the hacking of the DNC, suppressing what the FBI and the NSA had said.”
As Maté explained, that suppression continued after the election and the FBI and NSA findings were further buried by the 2017 ICA. “Someone might argue… what if the U.S. got new intelligence after the FBI and NSA first made that low confidence assessment? Well, now we know from the declassified [House] report… that basically no new intelligence was collected after the election, that most of the intelligence that went into the ICA was collected before the election,” he noted. “[That] means at the time that the FBI and the NSA made their low confidence assessment that Russia hacked the DNC, no new evidence was collected after that to change their minds.”
New Questions Emerge About Whether Russia Actually Hacked DNC and Clinton Campaign Emails in 2016
Megyn and Aaron Maté discuss what we are now learning about Russia's alleged involvement in 2016 Democrat email hacking.www.megynkelly.com
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
View attachment 1148857
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russiawww.realclearinvestigations.com
Most likely it was an internal release but it was done because what she was doing was corrupt as all get out.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,963
- 25,569
- 2,173
What you “believe” is almost entirely dependent on what is convenient for you.
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,903
- 24,842
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #87
DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine
Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation.
apnews.com
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 91,732
- 38,748
- 2,250
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,580
- 38,614
- 3,545
Sofa King stupid.
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,903
- 24,842
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #90
You will always have Hopium, peon.
DonGlock26
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2024
- 16,903
- 24,842
- 2,288
- Thread starter
- #91
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,580
- 38,614
- 3,545
Nope
IM2
Diamond Member
- Mar 11, 2015
- 113,677
- 144,131
- 3,645
Epstein was put in prison during trumps first term.
IDIOCRACY
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2017
- 5,007
- 5,411
- 1,938
They probably can't say exactly what they did, short term. We'll only get part of the story long term, people who know people....... they'll cut some deals, nobody is going to jail.
I can only hope Clinton, obama and chumps are tainted for all to see, only to see lib scholars write what great potus obummer and Clinton were, cuz stuff and stuff like that.
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,963
- 25,569
- 2,173
Jesus, where did this drama come from? They really have you all cranked up over nothing.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,580
- 38,614
- 3,545
Why do you hate the USA?
- Sep 16, 2012
- 75,401
- 72,473
- 3,605
Yup. I been saying the same thing since that time period. This site has always gotten it right since the exposed the Iran/Contra scandal.
July 15, 2018
Memo to the President Ahead of Monday's Summit
Ray McGovern and Bill Binney have written an open letter to President Trump ahead of Monday's summit. With Friday's indictments of Russian intelligence officers, Ray McGovern and Bill Binney have written an open letter to President Trump making clear that the “evidence” behind the indictments is a
consortiumnews.com
Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,963
- 25,569
- 2,173
Why are you so easily manipulated?
- Sep 16, 2012
- 75,401
- 72,473
- 3,605
It will be different this time MAGA
Trump was told all of this information in his first term, I don't know why we should expect a different outcome now.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
brainstorm question for light experiment- Started by trevorjohnson83
- Replies: 1
-
