Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

Lying about leftist positions on covid will not destroy the truth that still exists on record.




Business owners who defied Whitmer’s COVID orders to testify before Michigan House​

That was a state of Michigan constitutional issue. Not federal.
 
I never mentioned mandates so.........deflect away.

in my case it was Republican governors DeWine and Justice.
Compared to democrat mandates, republican mandates were wimpy.

Court Declares Gov. Whitmer’s COVID Emergency Powers Unconstitutional​

Midwest Institute of Health v. Governor
No. 161492, 2020 WL 5877599 (Mich. Oct. 2, 2020)
 
Now you are just rambling......

Trump funded the research. Gave Fauci the main stage. Supported nearly everything Fauci said.

View attachment 1258098

You don't care about civil rights or any of that. All you care about is your politics, hypocritical as it may be.
Dr. Collins admitted Fauci never stopped funding gain of function research. Trump made a mistake relying on Fauci before finding out what a greedy lowlife scumbag he is.
 
How about law firms that represent Trump. Any of those targeted for retribution by the DOJ under Garland?

Yeah there is a difference in the Royalist Benedict Donald and every other president we've ever had.
Democrats call Trump a traitor for ending many of their corrupted government funding skimming scams.
 
What Marxism?
Need to understand Marxism? Study Mamdani, B. Sanders, and some of that anti-American crowd to start with.

1779126325575.webp

1779126359783.webp



1779126384342.webp

1779126443102.webp



1779126477995.webp


1779126543870.webp


1779126581008.webp



1779126619897.webp



1779126687401.webp
 
Last edited:
Trump is fairly close in style and policy to Reagan.
Raygun didn't use lawfare in his life or his politics. Benedict Donald's life and politics is all about lawfare.

I hated Rayguns policies. He helped decimate the US Oil Exploration Industry.
 
Which was a conspiracy, majority scientific support for centuries-long global cooling trends or the subsequent majority scientific support for centuries-long global warming trends?
I'll need to link to sort that one out.
 
Democrats call Trump a traitor for ending many of their corrupted government funding skimming scams.
Benedict Donald and his New Republicans have betrayed not only the Constitution but also the modern day anti-corruption norms followed by both major parties in the wake of Nixon's resignation.

I think the Democrats wanted to go back to the old rules in 2020. I also think, they don't think that anymore.
 
And?????

Of course, States have the constitutional authority to impose public health mandates. This authority is deeply rooted in American law and has been repeatedly upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, though it must be balanced against individual civil liberties. States can allow or disallow local municipalities to do the same as well.
We saw how out of control democrats got with their out of bounds covid mandates after so many were declared by courts to be unconstituitional.
 
Man did not break the weather, and it is certain no human quack could fix the weather even it somehow got broken no matter how much cash the global warming tribal rain dancer collected from rubes and corrupted government programs.
What makes you so certain? Man has changed climate in the past, why not today?
 
Maybe we could start with the Piltdown Man, a hoax published in secondary school textbooks for 50 years before the scientific community finally admitted the fake 'missing link' was a fraud perpetuated by some of the most respected evolutionists in England.
Piltdown Man didn't refute evolution, exactly the opposite.
 
Scientists were propagating the global cooling scam years before anyone ever started propagating the global warming scam. Are you claiming no scientist propagated either scam before the early 1980s?
Are you talking about a scientist or the scientific concensus at that time?
 
Even before Benedict Donald's War, renewables had actually become the cheaper option for electricity generation.


Most green energy hopes died when the government subsidies dried up. Americans are not going to be easily persuaded to pay a lot more for crappy green energy deals that don't deliver as much as old existing deals.

1779127281487.webp



1779127035146.webp



1779127058317.webp


1779127086788.webp


1779127224766.webp
 
Doesn't matter now does it?


Fact: the earth contains a finite amount of hydrocarbons so it seems likely we'll have to find alternate energy sources at some point in the future. When that happens, do we want to find the Chinese have cornered the market on solar cells, EVs, and wind power? Oh wait, that is already the case.
I don't believe poor Americans should be forced to pay exorbitant costs for the new green energy cars, utilities, and appliances.
 
15th post
Are you saying Russian disinformation had no effect on any US voters? How about the hacking of the DNC emails?
Anyone claiming Russia hacked the DNC emails and gave the info to Assange is extremely ignorant of the facts. The ignorant could learn a great deal by reading the testimony of CrowdStrike experts on Capitol Hill.
 
not really, because Climate change was always used to garner campaign finance and kickback schemes, so it was a political sales tactic where you offer a feature and benefit that seperates you from the competition that don't feature it.
You are right but only because the right denies science did it become political.

Covid claims was so off base of science that it too was for political scheming and not science, example masks which were like trying to stop a gnat with a chain link fence.
It was the consensus of the medical professionals at the time.

The claim that getting the shot would prevent those around you from getting covid was laughable and used to trick and give vaccinations to the safe age range that weren't at risk for themselves.
Isn't that true of all vaccinations?
 
Back
Top Bottom