Matt Taibbi lays out why Liberals are destroying Free Speech

[pknopp]

Dr. Collins admitted Fauci never stopped funding gain of function research. Trump made a mistake relying on Fauci before finding out what a greedy lowlife scumbag he is.

Funding in China was stopped but you making excuses never will.

 

[toobfreak]

You didn't say 'humanity', you said 'scientists'.

Oh gee, now we are arguing semantics. A scientist is understood to be anyone who tries to explain the observable universe around us using rational, repeatable means seemingly independent of the measurer, who then becomes the standard bearer to others upon which all of humanity then accepts as our best expert reference standard.

The cosmic microwave background is microwave radiation that fills all space in the observable universe.

Or at least seems to radiate from all directions in space. Like I said, it /SUPPORTS/ the BBT! What part of that did you not get? BTW, I've been to and even studied at the place in New Jersey where the CMB was discovered.

 

[pknopp]

I appears it was the US government, i.e., the NIH, that voluntarily paused some gain of function research and then started it again without congressional or presidential mandate or approval.

Nope. But you know that.

 

[Lockback]

Dr. Collins admitted Fauci never stopped funding gain of function research. Trump made a mistake relying on Fauci before finding out what a greedy lowlife scumbag he is.

Absolutely correct.

 

[Marener]

The mistake democrat made was to downplay, ignore, coverup or intentionally lie about all the deadly reactions to the covid vaccines which had not been, as you pointed out, properly tested before release.

You mean we were to supposed to take people seriously when they said the vaccine made them magnetic?

Your people are freaks.

 

[markef]

Are you talking about a scientist or the scientific concensus at that time?

Both. Did reputable scientists claim the earth had been cooling for hundreds of years or was that a reported claim never proposed or presented by any reputable scientist as a scientific claim?

 

[Marener]

Cuomo rejected Trump's hospital ships and instead placed covid patients into rest homes where thousands of elderly patients were exposed and died.

How were the isolated patients able to expose everyone else?

 

[Marener]

God, your posts are so predictable anti-Trump.
"Fascist"?
Please. Give us a bleeping break. They're just pathetic.
Maybe it's time for you to become an adult.

If you don’t want to be labeled a fascist, don’t control speech and decide unilaterally what speech is allowed.

 

[markef]

You mean we were to supposed to take people seriously when they said the vaccine made them magnetic?

Your people are freaks.

When credible reports started claiming tens of thousands of people were dying within days of taking the vaccine everybody should have listened and looked into the reports for verification. Democrats too often stifled the reports and dummies were encouraged to call the reports fake news. Thart was totally irresponsible.

 

[Lockback]

If you don’t want to be labeled a fascist, don’t control speech and decide unilaterally what speech is allowed.

Like Biden did?
You're such a f##king hypocrite.

 

[markef]

Got it. Global warming can't be real since you know what God wants. Thanks.

Anyone claiming global warmings is real or not real based on feelings and not facts is not trustworthy. I have studied the issue extensively and am completely convinced the global warming narratives are bunk.

 

[markef]

In reality the peak of covid deaths was a few weeks after the public release of the "Killer" Vaccine and a few weeks before Biden took office.

Surveillance and Data Analytics

COVID-19 surveillance and data analytics

www.cdc.gov

Nonsense.

 

[markef]

I asked God once about Global Warming. She said "I'll Allow it!"

Your god and your 'scientific' opinions, assumptions, and speculations are highly suspect.

 

[alang1216]

Like
Dislike


Images
Videos
1988
Global warming first became a publicly reported concern in the summer of 1988, when NASA scientist James Hansen testified before the U.S. Senate that human-produced greenhouse gases were causing measurable warming of the planet. This testimony marked a significant moment in the public discourse on climate change, leading to increased awareness and concern about the implications of human activities on the environment.
scienceinsights.org+2

scienceinsights.org
When Did Global Warming Become an Issue: A Timeline
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=3518...YmFsLXdhcm1pbmctYmVjb21lLWEtY29uY2Vybi8&ntb=1

I don't understand how this answers the question "Which was a conspiracy, majority scientific support for centuries-long global cooling trends or the subsequent majority scientific support for centuries-long global warming trends?".

 

[Marener]

When credible reports started claiming tens of thousands of people were dying within days of taking the vaccine everybody should have listened and looked into the reports for verification. Democrats too often stifled the reports and dummies were encouraged to call the reports fake news. Thart was totally irresponsible.

Those reports were not credible, and failed to consider that when you give a vaccine to tens of millions of very elderly people, some of them will die of natural causes anyway. It’s a tiny, tiny percentage and consistent with what you’d expect.

 

[Marener]

Like Biden did?
You're such a f##king hypocrite.

Like Trump’s FCC does. Not sure what you’re talking about with Biden.

 

[Lockback]

Like Trump’s FCC does. Not sure what you’re talking about with Biden.

You're not paying attention. Remember the Twitter files?

 

[markef]

Well, the problem with the Higgs is that it is rather hard to verify since it splits off into the four normal force carriers very early in the universe.

I agree. That is one of the many problems with verifying the discovery of the 'god particle.'

I'm satisfied that the neutrino has been sufficiently detected and confirmed, as well as having been scientifically very well explained as being both necessary to and integral to solar reactions. And the neutrino has the added benefit in that as a ghost particle, it gives researchers insights into where to look and how next in the efforts to detect dark matter.

Scientists finally resolved the 70-year-old neutrino problem by changing how they defined the neutrino so that they could claim they detected it in a different way that could not be irrefutably verified.

Solar neutrino problem​

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The solar neutrino problem concerned a large discrepancy between the flux of solar neutrinos as predicted from the Sun's luminosity and as measured directly. The discrepancy was first observed in the mid-1960s and was resolved around 2002.

I'm made to wonder why scientists did not report the neutrino problem decades earlier, if we are to believe the Wikipedia report as written.

Here is more history:

1930​

In 1930, theoretical physicist Wolfgang Pauli hypothesized the existence of a particle like the neutrino to explain the problem of energy conservation in beta decay. He describes it in a letter that begins, "Dear radioactive ladies and gentlemen." Find highlights and a full translation here.

 

[Marener]

You're not paying attention. Remember the Twitter files?

Yeah. Taibbi fucked those up too.

 

[alang1216]

I agree with about 90% of that ^^^.
Climates are in continual flux, change. Ever hear of Ice Ages ?

View attachment 1258259

View attachment 1258261

I will strongly disagree with the following since it is subjective opinion(politics) and not PROVEN science;
...
This increase is due to humans emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and hence more being absorbed into the ocean. The ocean has absorbed between 20% and 30% of total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions in recent decades (7.2 to 10.8 billion metric tons per year).
...

I've yet to see any PROOF that this (climate change ~ global warming) is only or even mainly "human caused ~ anthropogenic "
Earth has extensive history of much higher average global temps and much higher CO2 levels, yet we fauna and flora still survive and thrive ....

View attachment 1258258

Proof is not something science offers, only evidence, and the majority of scientists who reviewed the evidence believe it is attributable to humans. Even if it is not, does that really matter? Warming is warming.