the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #421
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are. You know, the one posting fake videos of altered flashes added to the collapse of building #7 in order to make it appear like it was a controlled demolition.I don't know any "truthers" . Who are they ?It was never blown up. That's just another truther lie.Are you listening Uncle Larry ?
![]()
It probably isn't when it has steel fortified beams.It wasn't gravity?
Exactly how does a plane crashing into a building end up looking like a controlled demolition?
That's rather odd, IMO.
How is the top of the building supposed to fall?
And I-beam infrastructure.
A little jet fuel on fire isn't going to melt things like that.
Your jet fuel argument is irrelevant..... It was thousands and thousands of gallons. Have you ever thrown a full gallon of jet fuel (or diesel) on a fire before? If you had you wouldn't be acting like this. I threw a quart of diesel on a small fire one time and I wound up with a raging inferno 13 feet high and 5 feet around for about 30 seconds.
LOLOLThey don’t care
Academic integrity is not their friend. Only provide theories that support your claims
It was never blown up. That's just another truther lie.
Weaponizing the Term « Conspiracy Theory »: Disinformation Agents and the CIA | Mondialisation - Centre de Recherche sur la Mondialisation
Internet troll: A person, usually operating under a pseudonym, who posts deliberately provocative messages to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of provoking maximum disruption and argument. They are often paid by nefarious sources but sometime are motivated to do so for their own amusement. They often try to provoke dissension and doubt by writing dis-informational letters to the editors of newspapers.
Another good definition of an internet troll: A person who purposely and deliberately starts an online or media argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by other commenters. He will often use ad hominem attacks.
Your jet fuel argument is irrelevant..... It was thousands and thousands of gallons. Have you ever thrown a full gallon of jet fuel (or diesel) on a fire before? If you had you wouldn't be acting like this. I threw a quart of diesel on a small fire one time and I wound up with a raging inferno 13 feet high and 5 feet around for about 30 seconds.
Of the 3 WTC buildings which collapsed, let's leave Tower 7 out for a minute.
How do you explain both twin towers falling at equal freefall speed given the difference in the total weight collapsing from above between the two ? Keeping in mind -- the North tower was hit above the 92nd floor and damaged the core columns, whereas the South tower plane hit below the 80th floor and completely missed the core columns .
I'll wait. ( or rather , I'll be back later for your non-answer)
Internet Troll thy name is AngeloThey don’t care
Academic integrity is not their friend. Only provide theories that support your claims
It was never blown up. That's just another truther lie.
Weaponizing the Term « Conspiracy Theory »: Disinformation Agents and the CIA | Mondialisation - Centre de Recherche sur la Mondialisation
Internet troll: A person, usually operating under a pseudonym, who posts deliberately provocative messages to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of provoking maximum disruption and argument. They are often paid by nefarious sources but sometime are motivated to do so for their own amusement. They often try to provoke dissension and doubt by writing dis-informational letters to the editors of newspapers.
Another good definition of an internet troll: A person who purposely and deliberately starts an online or media argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by other commenters. He will often use ad hominem attacks.
The explanation is simple, truther... you're lying again.Your jet fuel argument is irrelevant..... It was thousands and thousands of gallons. Have you ever thrown a full gallon of jet fuel (or diesel) on a fire before? If you had you wouldn't be acting like this. I threw a quart of diesel on a small fire one time and I wound up with a raging inferno 13 feet high and 5 feet around for about 30 seconds.
Of the 3 WTC buildings which collapsed, let's leave Tower 7 out for a minute.
How do you explain both twin towers falling at equal freefall speed given the difference in the total weight collapsing from above between the two ? Keeping in mind -- the North tower was hit above the 92nd floor and damaged the core columns, whereas the South tower plane hit below the 80th floor and completely missed the core columns .
I'll wait. ( or rather , I'll be back later for your non-answer)
In skyscraper-collapse terms, 2 seconds means =.The explanation is simple, truther... you're lying again.
They didn't fall at the exact same speed. Tower one took 2 seconds longer than the other.
I very rarely resort to ad hominem attacks, whereas you actual trolls do it on a regular basis.Internet Troll thy name is Angelo
LOLOLOLIn skyscraper-collapse terms, 2 seconds means =.The explanation is simple, truther... you're lying again.
They didn't fall at the exact same speed. Tower one took 2 seconds longer than the other.
Again what is a truther ? I'm just a curious citizen.LOLOLOLIn skyscraper-collapse terms, 2 seconds means =.The explanation is simple, truther... you're lying again.
They didn't fall at the exact same speed. Tower one took 2 seconds longer than the other.
Only in demented truther land does 2 = 0.
11 Remarkable Facts About 9/11
11 REMARKABLE FACTS ABOUT 9/11
1) The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
It is commonly known that the Twin Towers fell on 9/11, but did you know that a third World Trade Center high-rise building also fell that day? WTC Building 7, a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper located one block from the Twin Towers was not hit by any plane, but collapsed at 5:20 that evening, imploding in the exactmanner of a professionally engineered demolition. It fell suddenly, straight down, at near freefall speed, and landed in a compact pile of rubble, barely damaging any of the surrounding buildings. These are but a few ofeleven characteristics of Building 7's collapse that are consistent only with controlled demolitions. Further, the leaseholder of the three buildings, Larry Silverstein, said in 2002 on PBS that on the afternoon of 9/11 he suggested to the NYC fire department commander that they "pull" WTC 7. "Pull" is an industry term that means "demolish," but it normally takes a team of skilled people many weeks to design and implement large demolitions. Astonishingly, there is no mention of WTC Building 7's remarkable collapse in the 571-page9/11 Commission Report.
2) Fire has never — prior to or after 9/11 — caused any steel frame building to collapse. The sudden, vertical, explosive, and total collapse of the Twin Towers at near freefall speed can only be explained by controlled demolition.
3) The WTC steel, which if fully examined could have relvealed the effects of explosives, was quickly shipped overseas and melted down. This was an unprecedented violation of federal crime scene laws.
4) Whenever contact is lost with any airplane, fighter jets routinely take to the air to investigate. This commonly occurs about 100 times per year in well under20 minutes. But on 9/11 nearly two hours passed without any interception.
5) The Secret Service broke established protocols by allowing President Bush to remain in a well-publicized classroom "photo op" long after it was known that the U.S. was under attack and he might well have been a target.
6) Unidentified insiders made millions on the stocks of American and United Airlines and those of other corporations that were likewise impacted by the attacks. These "put option" bets were made just prior to 9/11.
7) There were warnings of the impending attacks from at least eleven other countries. Also prior to 9/11, insiders such as John Ashcroft, top military officers, and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown were warned not to fly.
8) In September of 2000, a group of neocon hawks, many of whom would become key officials in the Bush administration, wrote that their proposed massive military buildup would proceed slowly "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."
9) Some of the alleged 9/11 "suicide hijackers" are still alive and well, according to the BBC and The Guardian. At least five of the alleged hijackers may have trained at U.S. military bases, as reported in Newsweek and other sources.
10) The Bush administration resisted the formation of the 9/11 Commission for441 days. Similar investigations, such as those for Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination, and the space shuttle disasters, all started in about one week.
11) "The Jersey Girls" — four courageous 9/11 widows — finally forced the 9/11 Commission into existence and presented many questions, most of which were ignored. Under the leadership of Bush administration insider Philip Zelikow, the final report failed to address any of the evidence pointing to official complicity.
There are hundreds of additional facts that contradict the official story of 9/11.It is time for a truly independent investigation that addresses all the questions asked by the citizens' 9/11 Truth & Justice Movement! You can help bring this about by educating yourself and others about 9/11. Go to www.911truth.org to learn more about these 11 facts, discover many others, and read about the many prominent authorities who support this movement. To find recommended books, magazines, and DVD's, and to obtain more of these cards, go towww.911sharethetruth.com.
"Again what is a truther ?"Again what is a truther ? I'm just a curious citizen.LOLOLOLIn skyscraper-collapse terms, 2 seconds means =.The explanation is simple, truther... you're lying again.
They didn't fall at the exact same speed. Tower one took 2 seconds longer than the other.
Only in demented truther land does 2 = 0.
And I won't give you any analogies because your tiny brain obviously
can't grasp basic physics, much less an understanding of this subject.
Now run along and type a report on immigration or something and troll somewhere else, J Edgar Faunschild IV.