Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
It is a fucking painting! None of what you claim has ever taken place except in the mind of some deluded hater of Masonry.
Marxist Pelosi Fixing Law to Eliminate God from Oath in House. Vote!
- Thread starter beautress
- Start date
It is a fucking painting! None of what you claim has ever taken place except in the mind of some deluded hater of Masonry.
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
What does the Senate have to do with anything?
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
No, I don't remember that because she was a Senator.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
The thing about God...He cannot be banned...he is bigger than that.
OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,614
- 2,220
Oops. House. But to be sensible, shouldn't the rule be for both the House and the Senate?
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
The Republicans need to force a vote on this issue. Getting the Libs ON THE RECORD dissing Almighty God.
The majority of people in this country still support God, especially those of us in the Basket of Deplorables.
Indeed. They work for the same Constitution. And that Constitution still does not contrive a theocracy.
Not sure what part of "this is not a theocracy" doesn't get through to the theocrats. You'd think they could handle small words.
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Once AGAIN ---- you do **NOT** insert your own words into my post, I said nothing about gods being "partisan" or "nonpartisan", I said they are not PRESENT. Go learn how to read.
And again "Libs" (or "cons" or "parties") have nothing to say about "gods" because THEY'RE NOT A PART OF WHAT THE FUCK THEY DO. THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP. PERIOD.
Once AGAIN for the obtuse --- WE DO NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY. And we're not about to as long as the Constitution exists. GET IT?
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Do you think that people should end the oath with "So help me God"?
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Once AGAIN ---- you do **NOT** insert your own words into my post, I said nothing about gods being "partisan" or "nonpartisan", I said they are not PRESENT. Go learn how to read.
And again "Libs" (or "cons" or "parties") have nothing to say about "gods" because THEY'RE NOT A PART OF WHAT THE FUCK THEY DO. THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP. PERIOD.
Once AGAIN for the obtuse --- WE DO NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY. And we're not about to as long as the Constitution exists. GET IT?
Actually, you are dead wrong here. America is "One Nation Under God", a resolution was passed in a bipartisan manner by the US Congress and signed by President Eisenhower to that effect. "In God we Trust" is on our money.
We are a non-sectarian state, but that doesn't mean that we don't recognize the sovereignty of Almighty God.
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Do you think that people should end the oath with "So help me God"?
Absolutely. We are still recognized as one nation under God.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Do you think that people should end the oath with "So help me God"?
Absolutely. We are still recognized as one nation under God.
What about the fact that Jesus told you not to do so...
But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil
and it is repeated again by James, the brother of Jesus...
12 But above all, my brothers, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath, but let your “yes” be yes and your “no” be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation.
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Once AGAIN ---- you do **NOT** insert your own words into my post, I said nothing about gods being "partisan" or "nonpartisan", I said they are not PRESENT. Go learn how to read.
And again "Libs" (or "cons" or "parties") have nothing to say about "gods" because THEY'RE NOT A PART OF WHAT THE FUCK THEY DO. THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP. PERIOD.
Once AGAIN for the obtuse --- WE DO NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY. And we're not about to as long as the Constitution exists. GET IT?
Actually, you are dead wrong here. America is "One Nation Under God", a resolution was passed in a bipartisan manner by the US Congress and signed by President Eisenhower to that effect. "In God we Trust" is on our money.
Indeed it was. And that's counterConstitutional bullshit, whether it was done or not. Further it refers to a national prayer, the very existence of which even without that phrase, is bullshit all by itself. We cannot be forced to worship The State. FUCK that. That prayer was contrived, literally, as an advertisement propaganda to sell flags to schools. That's literally what it is, and nobody in the world contrives such a fetish prayer except us and our former colony the Philippines.
Hell, there are still even now blasphemy laws on the books. Completely unConstitutional. I don't give a fuck if something exists, I care that it doesn't have a right to exist.
We run on a Constitution --- not on a fetish prayer drawn up as ad copy in 1892. K?
Actually that's exactly what it means.
Apparently the simple sentence "we are not a theocracy" continues to fly over your pointy little head. Write it on the blackboard five hundred times until it sinks the fuck in.
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Once AGAIN ---- you do **NOT** insert your own words into my post, I said nothing about gods being "partisan" or "nonpartisan", I said they are not PRESENT. Go learn how to read.
And again "Libs" (or "cons" or "parties") have nothing to say about "gods" because THEY'RE NOT A PART OF WHAT THE FUCK THEY DO. THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP. PERIOD.
Once AGAIN for the obtuse --- WE DO NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY. And we're not about to as long as the Constitution exists. GET IT?
Actually, you are dead wrong here. America is "One Nation Under God", a resolution was passed in a bipartisan manner by the US Congress and signed by President Eisenhower to that effect. "In God we Trust" is on our money.
Indeed it was. And that's counterConstitutional bullshit, whether it was done or not. Further it refers to a national prayer, the very existence of which even without that phrase, is bullshit all by itself. We cannot be forced to worship The State. FUCK that. That prayer was contrived, literally, as an advertisement propaganda to sell flags to schools. That's literally what it is, and nobody in the world contrives such a fetish prayer except us and our former colony the Philippines.
Hell, there are still even now blasphemy laws on the books. Completely unConstitutional. I don't give a fuck if something exists, I care that it doesn't have a right to exist.
We run on a Constitution --- not on a fetish prayer drawn up as ad copy in 1892. K?
Actually that's exactly what it means.
Apparently the simple sentence "we are not a theocracy" continues to fly over your pointy little head. Write it on the blackboard five hundred times until it sinks the fuck in.
Pelosi should put it up to a vote then. If Almighty God should be driven from America, let the Congress vote on it.
beautress
Always Faithful
- Thread starter
- #578
I'm aware of her religious affiliation and have been intentionally mum about it. Something inside me tells me that unless a church clearly makes an attempt to destroy our government, that is not a political matter. However, this week locally, 300 priests in the Galveston-Houston area are on the carpet for sexual abuse of parishioner minor children spanning a 75-year period of abuses that parents had complained to the hierarchy, and nothing was done to stop the offenses. Some of the rapes were of girls, and some of boys. I'm horrified that this kind of stuff is going around, because abused children often become abusive adults. I'm sick to my soul about it, because one of my family members was abused at a key time in his life and as a consequence, he will never produce grandchildren due to such a seduction turning into a change of lifestyle. He now no longer is affiliated with any kind of church. If that's the passive-aggressive manner in which such an organization operates to eliminate competitors, it's less of a church than it is a hidden power grabber to take people's families away from them through nefarious means.
Our Constitution demands that we do not interfere with churches in the first amendment. I do not see a way out of this issue that would result in reconciliation. Thank you for your input on this issue. I hope we can resolve this power grab issue and put religious power that begets family and personal breakups out of the spiritual business.
I have long regarded the "conversion" of prisoners and minorities to a religion that teaches people to kill for God. Long before 9/11 we have been systematically doused by such an entity that points out divisions in our society by former criminals who can be easily brainwashed into becoming murderers of infidels for Allah. This is a complex systematic proliferator of human killers whereby militaristic knowledge is espoused by one part of their mosques, and family issues are concentrated in the center, to prove that they are a religion, and not a military outfit, well-concealed from outsiders, and our government adopted a hands-off procedure against churches at the outset. It has a potential to destroy our freedoms from the inside out.
There are too many outsider forces trying to worm their way into power in our country, not to unite, but to destroy. I don't like any of it.
Last edited:
beautress
Always Faithful
- Thread starter
- #579
What would you support, Polishprince?"Libs" have nothing to do with "almighty god". The entire Constitution has nothing to do with "almighty gods". That's all RELIGION. Not politics, not government ---- RELIGION.
Holy SHIT
Almighty God is capitalized, that's common courtesy to our Creator. You are right in the sense that Almighty God is non-partisan, and has traditionally been supported by all people and all American political parties. But that's why I think that getting the libs on the record for this as disrespect to God is important.
This is a difference between the parties, and a new one.
Once AGAIN ---- you do **NOT** insert your own words into my post, I said nothing about gods being "partisan" or "nonpartisan", I said they are not PRESENT. Go learn how to read.
And again "Libs" (or "cons" or "parties") have nothing to say about "gods" because THEY'RE NOT A PART OF WHAT THE FUCK THEY DO. THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP. PERIOD.
Once AGAIN for the obtuse --- WE DO NOT HAVE A THEOCRACY. And we're not about to as long as the Constitution exists. GET IT?
Actually, you are dead wrong here. America is "One Nation Under God", a resolution was passed in a bipartisan manner by the US Congress and signed by President Eisenhower to that effect. "In God we Trust" is on our money.
Indeed it was. And that's counterConstitutional bullshit, whether it was done or not. Further it refers to a national prayer, the very existence of which even without that phrase, is bullshit all by itself. We cannot be forced to worship The State. FUCK that. That prayer was contrived, literally, as an advertisement propaganda to sell flags to schools. That's literally what it is, and nobody in the world contrives such a fetish prayer except us and our former colony the Philippines.
Hell, there are still even now blasphemy laws on the books. Completely unConstitutional. I don't give a fuck if something exists, I care that it doesn't have a right to exist.
We run on a Constitution --- not on a fetish prayer drawn up as ad copy in 1892. K?
Actually that's exactly what it means.
Apparently the simple sentence "we are not a theocracy" continues to fly over your pointy little head. Write it on the blackboard five hundred times until it sinks the fuck in.
Pelosi should put it up to a vote then. If Almighty God should be driven from America, let the Congress vote on it.
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 49,654
- 40,553
- 3,615
I like America the way it is, One Nation Under Almighty God, just like our Pledge says.
However, if the libs disagree, they should put it up to a vote
Similar threads
- Poll
New Topics
-
Pro Zelensky church in Ukraine is being persecuted by the Zelensky regime- Started by Andrew_Jackson_FTW
- Replies: 2
-
-
-
Trumpflation: Record beef prices raise Memorial Day cookout costs- Started by g5000
- Replies: 10
-
Latest Discussions
-
Trump uses photos from wrong country as evidence of ‘white genocide’ in South Africa
- Latest: Andrew_Jackson_FTW
