Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
You need to learn a little something about consent...before you get yourself into trouble.
Marriage Has Never Been Just Between A Man And A Woman
- Thread starter Howey
- Start date
You need to learn a little something about consent...before you get yourself into trouble.
Redfish
Diamond Member
gay marriage is just step one towards the total destruction of marriage. If gay marriage becomes legal then there is no legal defence that can be brought to deny bigamy, polygamy, mother/daughter, father/son, brother/sister, et al.
the legal argument will be that those people are being denied their civil rights to marry and live with who they want. Gay marriage laws will be brought up as the precedent. It is a slippery slope. many of you refuse to acknowledge that reality, but it is there nonetheless.
Since we are a nation of laws, this will be decided on legal precedence, and all forms of marriage will become legal--------and the lawyers will be celebrating all the litigation to come when there is a divorce in a polygamous marriage, or an inheritence fight between two married brothers and their married sisters.
Its where you on the left are taking us---------------wake the **** up.
the legal argument will be that those people are being denied their civil rights to marry and live with who they want. Gay marriage laws will be brought up as the precedent. It is a slippery slope. many of you refuse to acknowledge that reality, but it is there nonetheless.
Since we are a nation of laws, this will be decided on legal precedence, and all forms of marriage will become legal--------and the lawyers will be celebrating all the litigation to come when there is a divorce in a polygamous marriage, or an inheritence fight between two married brothers and their married sisters.
Its where you on the left are taking us---------------wake the **** up.
Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
In 17 states and the District of Columbia it is legal. Destroyed yet? Gays have been legally marrying in Massachusetts for a decade. Anyone marrying family members, animals or multiple people there? How long does it take?
No, the precedent is here:
Loving v Virginia (1967)
Zablocki v Wisconsin (1978)
Turner v Safley (1987)
And since those cases didn't bring about dogs and cats living together, why do you assume that because non familial consenting adult same sex couples are now marrying that we must slippery slope to such an inevitable end? Countries with marriage equality have not seen a significant rise in challenges to their bans on polygamy. I should also point out that countries that have legalized polygamy don't have marriage equality for gays.
The legal precedent was decided in 1967, 78 and 87. No Fish, siblings will not be able to legally marry. Polygamy...well, it's a true long shot looking at it from an oddsmaker perspective. I certainly wouldn't put any money on it when you look at the actual data...and there is centuries of data on polygamy. It was popular among the 1% back in the olden days.
It still is popular in some parts of the country...why haven't they slippery sloped to gay marriage?
The Big Question: What's the history of polygamy, and how serious a problem is it in Africa?
How common is it?
In 1998 the University of Wisconsin surveyed more than a thousand societies. Of these just 186 were monogamous. Some 453 had occasional polygyny and in 588 more it was quite common. Just four featured polyandry. Some anthropologists believe that polygamy has been the norm through human history. In 2003, New Scientist magazine suggested that, until 10,000 years ago, most children had been sired by comparatively few men. Variations in DNA, it said, showed that the distribution of X chromosomes suggested that a few men seem to have had greater input into the gene pool than the rest. By contrast most women seemed to get to pass on their genes. Humans, like their primate forefathers, it said, were at least "mildly polygynous".
Polygamy is very common in the animist and Muslim communities of West Africa. In Senegal, for example, nearly 47 per cent of marriages are said to feature multiple women. It is relatively high still in many Arab nations; among the Bedouin population of Israel it stands at about 30 per cent. According to The Salt Lake Tribune as many as 10,000 Mormon fundamentalists in 2005 lived in polygamous families.
In 1998 the University of Wisconsin surveyed more than a thousand societies. Of these just 186 were monogamous. Some 453 had occasional polygyny and in 588 more it was quite common. Just four featured polyandry. Some anthropologists believe that polygamy has been the norm through human history. In 2003, New Scientist magazine suggested that, until 10,000 years ago, most children had been sired by comparatively few men. Variations in DNA, it said, showed that the distribution of X chromosomes suggested that a few men seem to have had greater input into the gene pool than the rest. By contrast most women seemed to get to pass on their genes. Humans, like their primate forefathers, it said, were at least "mildly polygynous".
Polygamy is very common in the animist and Muslim communities of West Africa. In Senegal, for example, nearly 47 per cent of marriages are said to feature multiple women. It is relatively high still in many Arab nations; among the Bedouin population of Israel it stands at about 30 per cent. According to The Salt Lake Tribune as many as 10,000 Mormon fundamentalists in 2005 lived in polygamous families.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
That's absurd.
btw, what is your argument against a brother and sister getting married?
Let's hear it.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
So a man with a vasectomy is comparable to a pedophile?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
How do you know what's natural and what isn't or why it should or shouldn't be called a crime?
Is heterosexual oral sex a crime against nature? Is heterosexual anal sex a crime against nature? Is taking pills to prevent pregnancy a crime against nature? Is the taking of vows of celibacy a crime against nature?
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
The vile nasty lies spewed by some rw's is far far worse than any of the so-called crimes they're against.
You really are a sick bunch.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
lol, is that a yes or a no?
Which then is the worse crime? A man and a women who have anal and oral and vaginal sex,
or 2 women who have oral sex?
Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,999
- 2,040
Pop23
Gold Member
BS.
If a gay male goes to a gym and showers with a room full of males, the gender he finds the most sexually appealing, other men, he will not be arrested
If a heterosexual male goes to a gym and showers with a room full of naked females, the gender he is the most sexually attracted to, he WILL be arrested.
When will Heterosexual stand up and assert they are being oppressed!
This whole debate is just silly. Separate but equal is OK only if it oppresses heterosexuals.
in the Genesis account, we note that the newly created Eve was Adam — his very flesh and bone, and for that reason, the Bible says, Adam called her woman, and, for that reason a man is to leave mother and father and be united to his wife to become one flesh (v24).
For what reason is man to marry a wife? Because woman was originally a constituent part of man, she must return to become one with him again, so that the full expression and design of God's image in human beings can be revealed.
Here we have another parallel between the Old Testament type and the New Testament fulfillment. Eve was to reunite with her source and become one with him—just as we are with Christ, as He prayed in John 17. Sexuality, therefore, is a prefigurement of the intimate relationship that God desires to have with man. In fact, the marital union and covenant, in all its dimensions, is meant to gloriously reveal the very image of God in ways that we can only begin to understand.
For what reason is man to marry a wife? Because woman was originally a constituent part of man, she must return to become one with him again, so that the full expression and design of God's image in human beings can be revealed.
Here we have another parallel between the Old Testament type and the New Testament fulfillment. Eve was to reunite with her source and become one with him—just as we are with Christ, as He prayed in John 17. Sexuality, therefore, is a prefigurement of the intimate relationship that God desires to have with man. In fact, the marital union and covenant, in all its dimensions, is meant to gloriously reveal the very image of God in ways that we can only begin to understand.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
That's a completely separate issue. This is about the nature of he compulsion, not the law.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
A vasectomy is not a proclivity.
Howey
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 5,481
- 761
- 200
- Thread starter
- #58
BS.
If a gay male goes to a gym and showers with a room full of males, the gender he finds the most sexually appealing, other men, he will not be arrested
You do understand gays have been in the gyms all along, right?
We've been looking at your junk since middle school. You have nothing to worry about.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Sunfresh, the city run grocery store, in Kansas City lasted longer than I thought it would.- Started by the watcher
- Replies: 0
-
-
Zone1 If the super natural exists then there surely is a G-d
- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 0
-
-
