- Banned
- #61
And I don't care.Friends, family and neighbors say you should remove guns from this guy while he is being investigated.
View attachment 411788
Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly agrees
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I don't care.Friends, family and neighbors say you should remove guns from this guy while he is being investigated.
View attachment 411788
Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly agrees
I don't think Kelley will be around in four years. Among his many promises was to not go along with the Democratic leadership, but to be an independent voice for Arizona. He's been trying to portray himself as a centrist beholden to neither party. Well I'll believe that when I see a flock of pigs fly by my window. His opponent in 2026 will be able to point to Kelly voting in lockstep with the Democrats and destroy him.I know it is early and his political career has just started but I have a strong hunch that in 2024 Mark Kelly will be running for the Oval Office and if not then in 2028 and he could win if he plays the game correctly.
Americans love their celebrities and military men and he checks off the correct boxes to draw in the right amount of votes if he did run in 2024...
Let be clear Biden is one and done and Harris is hated by so many so the Democratic Party will be looking for someone they can run that can defeat someone like Cruz in 2024...
So I will leave this here and we will see in four years if Kelly is the left Candidate for President or VP...
No they put the rights of a person not convicted of a crime on the same level as a liberal. Most republicans want criminals locked up where they can't harm society. Most liberals want them released because their crimes are someone else's fault. Until a person commits a crime they are a innocent citizen and you shouldn't even think of removing their rights. Should you be allowed to post here? I believe that you are going to promote violence against me tomorrow. By your logic, your computer should be confiscated right away to prevent your future possible actions. Didn't Tom Cruise make a movie about the government arresting people for future crimes? Isn't that what you are proposing?That’s because Dems always vote to restrict gun rights.NRA pulls the same shit with every DemocratKelly would bring new blood to the party and Gabby Giffords would be an inspirational First Lady.
They would be the NRAs worst nightmare
How would it be "bad" for the NRA? NRA membership soared during the regime of gungrabber Obama.
Ironically, the election of Trump would be bad for the NRA, as people would see less reason to belong
”Fill in Democrats Name” is going to take your guns
Send us money![]()
Dems vote for safety.
Republicans put the rights of an assassin over the rights of his victims
Friends, family and neighbors say you should remove guns from this guy while he is being investigated.
View attachment 411788
Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly agrees
Friends, family and neighbors say you should remove guns from this guy while he is being investigated.
View attachment 411788
Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly agrees
"If the people who know you best suspect there is something seriously wrong with you" you should be locked up in an insane asylum to protect society, not running around with a psychiatrist prescribing you meds that you refuse to take.![]()
NASA astronaut Mark Kelly, whose wife Gabby Giffords was shot in the head, still owns guns. He says Congress could do a lot more to keep people safe.
NASA astronaut Mark Kelly is running for Senate in Arizona. He supports stronger federal background checks and more red-flag laws.www.businessinsider.com
Kelly has three big policy proposals on gun safety. First, he supports universal federal background check legislation that would require every gun seller in the US to vet who's buying their guns.
Second, Kelly said the US should crack down on domestic violence offenders with guns. Perpetrators of mass shootings have disproportionately troubling histories of abusing women.
Finally, more red-flag laws would help, Kelly said. These laws permit family members, roommates, law-enforcement officers, and others who are worried about someone's mental state to temporarily restrict that person's access to guns.
Who could possibly oppose these?
"Red flag" laws would punish people BEFORE any trial or appeals. That's a problem.
Too freaking bad
In mass shooting after mass shooting we hear the same story.
It is not......I never suspected he could do such a thing, it’s “That guy was always creepy and I knew it was a matter of time.
If the people who know you best suspect there is something seriously wrong with you, it is not that big a “punishment” to have him give up his arsenal while everything is sorted out
Except he will go to the store and buy a knife, or a length of rope, or a gallon of gasoline and kill her anyway. So taking away his guns accomplishes exactly nothing. Guns are the most likely weapons, but knives are close behind. If a spouse of either gender wants to kill their partner there are a myriad of methodsWhile they are still out and a threat to their wife?Wife beaters belong in prison. I agree.How is he going to “crack down” on them? By keeping them in prison? If not he is full of shit.Second, Kelly said the US should crack down on domestic violence offenders with guns. Perpetrators of mass shootings have disproportionately troubling histories of abusing women.
Wife beaters belong in prison
They should also be kept away from guns.
Those that are accused of wife beating but not yet found guilty of such should not lose their rights as an american.
Small inconvenience to take his weapons away
If there is sufficient cause to remove his second amendment right there is sufficient cause to confine him while evaluating him. It's far safer for society to confine him if he is a serious danger.Friends, family and neighbors say you should remove guns from this guy while he is being investigated.
View attachment 411788
Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly agrees
I don't think Kelley will be around in four years. Among his many promises was to not go along with the Democratic leadership, but to be an independent voice for Arizona. He's been trying to portray himself as a centrist beholden to neither party. Well I'll believe that when I see a flock of pigs fly by my window. His opponent in 2026 will be able to point to Kelly voting in lockstep with the Democrats and destroy him.I know it is early and his political career has just started but I have a strong hunch that in 2024 Mark Kelly will be running for the Oval Office and if not then in 2028 and he could win if he plays the game correctly.
Americans love their celebrities and military men and he checks off the correct boxes to draw in the right amount of votes if he did run in 2024...
Let be clear Biden is one and done and Harris is hated by so many so the Democratic Party will be looking for someone they can run that can defeat someone like Cruz in 2024...
So I will leave this here and we will see in four years if Kelly is the left Candidate for President or VP...