Mar-a-Lago warrant judge attacked Trump on Facebook

[MinTrut]

Details here:

The Judge Who Signed Off On the Mar-a-Lago Raid Made Disparaging Remarks About Trump in 2017

I did some journalism of my own and found Judge Bruce Reinhart's personal Facebook page

lippincott.substack.com

The judge also has a private blog which investigators hope to access to uncover more hostility toward Trump.

Was the warrant shopped to this judge due to his public animosity toward Trump?

Should Judge Reinhart have removed/recused himself from this process?

Have elite Democrats now reached the point where they believe any action, no matter how repugnant or lawless, is justified by their hatred of Trump?

How badly will 8/8 blow up in the faces of elite Democrats like Reinhart who believe they're above the law?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Details here:

The Judge Who Signed Off On the Mar-a-Lago Raid Made Disparaging Remarks About Trump in 2017

I did some journalism of my own and found Judge Bruce Reinhart's personal Facebook page

lippincott.substack.com

The judge also has a private blog which investigators hope to access to uncover more hostility toward Trump.

Was the warrant shopped to this judge due to his public animosity toward Trump?

Should Judge Reinhart have removed/recused himself from this process?

Have elite Democrats now reached the point where they believe any action, no matter how repugnant or lawless, is justified by their hatred of Trump?

How badly will 8/8 blow up in the faces of elite Democrats like Reinhart who believe they're above the law?

Oh no, what will you woke people do with judges saying that Trump doesn't have the "moral stature to kiss John Lewis's feet"????

I mean, we could spend all day PROVING him right. Simple fact is that Trump kicked up a hissy fit over John Lewis simply because he didn't go to Trump's inauguration (like a lot of people).

 

[22lcidw]

Oh no, what will you woke people do with judges saying that Trump doesn't have the "moral stature to kiss John Lewis's feet"????

I mean, we could spend all day PROVING him right. Simple fact is that Trump kicked up a hissy fit over John Lewis simply because he didn't go to Trump's inauguration (like a lot of people).

John Lewis lost his way a long time ago. He died a different person than his humble beginnings.

 

[frigidweirdo]

John Lewis lost his way a long time ago. He died a different person than his humble beginnings.

What does this have to do with anything?

This judge make a remark that Trump wasn't worthy. I think many, many people would think the same. It's not like a very uncommon thought.

To claim this judge is going after Trump because of that one tweet is ridiculous.

John Lewis did a lot for the US, Trump... well, he's done a lot of negative for the country.

 

[MinTrut]

Oh no, what will you woke people do with judges saying that Trump doesn't have the "moral stature to kiss John Lewis's feet"????

I mean, we could spend all day PROVING him right. Simple fact is that Trump kicked up a hissy fit over John Lewis simply because he didn't go to Trump's inauguration (like a lot of people).

Judge Reinhart needed to recuse himself.

And that's just based on what we know so far.

 

[Care4all]

The Judge Magistrate's wife is some big time Republican in the State and appointed by Rick Scott for her position....
,...............................


You shop courts, for the chance of a judge you want, if you can, with your case.

In this case though, the court and judge could not be shopped, because the search warrant had to be filed in Palm Beach County, southern District federal court, because that is where Trump's home is....

 

[MinTrut]

John Lewis lost his way a long time ago. He died a different person than his humble beginnings.

He became another corrupt, self-serving Democrat deified beyond recognition.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Judge Reinhart needed to recuse himself.

And that's just based on what we know so far.

What, because he made a comment about Trump?
Right, let's find a US judge who has never, ever made a comment about Trump. That's your man.
I'm thinking some Nigerian prince....

 

[22lcidw]

What does this have to do with anything?

This judge make a remark that Trump wasn't worthy. I think many, many people would think the same. It's not like a very uncommon thought.

To claim this judge is going after Trump because of that one tweet is ridiculous.

John Lewis did a lot for the US, Trump... well, he's done a lot of negative for the country.

Trump has helped all to live better and was not what Progs call a religious zealot. The powerful elites will not tolerate a person leading this nation who does not have globalist agendas. That is the crux of the situation. They use his personality to try to destroy him.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Trump has helped all to live better and was not what Progs call a religious zealot. The powerful elites will not tolerate a person leading this nation who does not have globalist agendas. That is the crux of the situation. They use his personality to try to destroy him.

No, he wasn't a religious zealot, I'll give him that.

As for helping people to live better... bullshit.

The US hasn't changed much since Trump got into power. Perhaps it invaded a little less, then again Biden hasn't exactly invaded anywhere either.
Beyond that the country has carried on pretty much as normal. Sinking. Trump didn't put any changes in that lasted beyond January 6th, except to encourage fucking crazy fuckers from thinking they could run for the presidency.

KANYE FUCKING WEST ran TWICE in 2020 for VP. God help us all.

 

[Care4all]

Trump has helped all to live better and was not what Progs call a religious zealot. The powerful elites will not tolerate a person leading this nation who does not have globalist agendas. That is the crux of the situation. They use his personality to try to destroy him.

He has a global agenda 22, only it's all for himself...truly!!!

 

[MinTrut]

What, because he made a comment about Trump?
Right, let's find a US judge who has never, ever made a comment about Trump. That's your man.
I'm thinking some Nigerian prince....

He was incapable of assessing the warrant's assertions in the neutral fashion required by law.

And that's just based on what we know so far - the investigation into his bias is ongoing.

 

[frigidweirdo]

He was incapable of assessing the warrant's assertions in the neutral fashion required by law.

And that's just based on what we know so far - the investigation into his bias is ongoing.

Based on that logic NOBODY would ever be able to do anything in a neutral fashion.

Straws being clutched.

 

[MinTrut]

Based on that logic NOBODY would ever be able to do anything in a neutral fashion.

Straws being clutched.

Based on the unprecedented escalation of the witch hunt/insurrection the Democrats were asking the warrant approving judge to sign off on, s/he needed to be beyond squeaky clean.

Just based on what we know so far, he should have recused himself.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Based on the unprecedented escalation of the witch hunt/insurrection the Democrats were asking the warrant approving judge to sign off on, s/he needed to be beyond squeaky clean.

Just based on what we know so far, he should have recused himself.

Well, what were they asking for? Based on what evidence? You don't know. So....

Based on "what we know so far", the right would have attacked any judge whatsoever. We know Trump attacks everyone who goes against him.

So.... I disagree.

 

[MinTrut]

Well, what were they asking for? Based on what evidence? You don't know. So....

Based on "what we know so far", the right would have attacked any judge whatsoever. We know Trump attacks everyone who goes against him.

So.... I disagree.

The judge needed to recuse himself, full stop.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The judge needed to recuse himself, full stop.

So which judge would be squeaky clean for you?

 

[MinTrut]

So which judge would be squeaky clean for you?

This judge - the subject of the thread - needed to recuse himself, full stop.

And that's just based on what we know so far - the investigation into him is ongoing.

 

[Moonglow]

Based on the unprecedented escalation of the witch hunt/insurrection the Democrats were asking the warrant approving judge to sign off on, s/he needed to be beyond squeaky clean.

Just based on what we know so far, he should have recused himself.

There is no conflict of interest to sit on the bench and have an opinion.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Have elite Democrats now reached the point where they believe any action, no matter how repugnant or lawless, is justified by their hatred of Trump?

Yes, they have.

They remind me of G. Gordon Liddy, the former FBI agent who was the planner and operational commander of a gang of dirty tricksters who were caught burglarizing the Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate Hotel, after committing a string of other politically motivated crimes. He stated in his book that he would have stopped at nothing to ensure that Nixon won re-election in 1972.

His justification was that in 1972, the American people were in a war with forces out to destroy it, and in a war you do whatever it takes to win. That was the flaw in his reasoning. The 1972 election was not a war, and the Democrats were not an anti-American enemy, they were the opposing political party.

The Democrats of today have also lost sight of America as a Democratic Republic. Rather than ask themselves why Trump was able to get more votes, as a political neophyte, than a lifelong professional politician, and seeking to address their own weaknesses, they have spent about six years using the power of the federal government in trying to destroy him so that they don't have to face that kind of loss again.