There's a problem with what you label "history" and "revisionist history". All history is "revisionist" and all history is subject to interpretation by whomever writes, remembers it, translates it or embroiders it. And all of it is biased.
Not all history is revisionist. Did you consider most of what they taught you in school or university as revisionist? Calling Israel, Palestine when their wasn't even a Palestine back then, is revisionist. That's what happens when your identity is a house of cards built on lies.
History is constantly being revised - hence it's revisionist. History is usually written by the victors, hence it's going to be biased.
Palestine is the conventional name for an area in the ME. There was a Palestine under the Ottomans and under the mandate. There was no Israel for 3000 years until 1948 when it was re-invented. Most ancient history is compilation of translated histories, guesswork, mythology, and information extrapolated from archaeology. It strikes me as ridiculous to try to demean the history of others by claiming they are an "invented" people.
All people were, at one time, invented.