Many questions remain about 9/11 as we near the 18th anniversary.

[ReinyDays]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

 

[the other mike]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

Not the way the steel core columns were in the twins....could never have happened the way
they collapsed without somehow taking out the core columns. The structure below, especially in the North tower that collapsed last, would have resisted the collapse and at least slowed it down. Newtons third law of motion and the design of the towers are in direct conflict with the NIST conclusions.

 

[ReinyDays]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

Not the way the steel core columns were in the twins....could never have happened the way
they collapsed without somehow taking out the core columns. The structure below, especially in the North tower that collapsed last, would have resisted the collapse and at least slowed it down. Newtons third law of motion and the design of the towers are in direct conflict with the NIST conclusions.

I don't think you understand Newton's Third Law ... the building carries a force vector pointed down, the Earth itself has a force vector pointed up ... as the building come down the Earth's rotation speeds up ... like a figure skater pulling her arms in ... free fall in a vacuum allows 6.5 seconds for the collapse, actual time was 9 or 11 seconds ... this allows for resistance ...

The core column was concrete, and concrete performs poorly under stress ... the steel was subject to the avgas fire ... the core column was taken out at the level the planes crashed into, and this is where the collapsed occurred ... the lower part of the building remained intact until the top part slammed into it ... the folks you're relying on need to improve their photoshop skills I think ...

 

[the other mike]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

Not the way the steel core columns were in the twins....could never have happened the way
they collapsed without somehow taking out the core columns. The structure below, especially in the North tower that collapsed last, would have resisted the collapse and at least slowed it down. Newtons third law of motion and the design of the towers are in direct conflict with the NIST conclusions.

I don't think you understand Newton's Third Law ... the building carries a force vector pointed down, the Earth itself has a force vector pointed up ... as the building come down the Earth's rotation speeds up ... like a figure skater pulling her arms in ... free fall in a vacuum allows 6.5 seconds for the collapse, actual time was 9 or 11 seconds ... this allows for resistance ...

The core column was concrete, and concrete performs poorly under stress ... the steel was subject to the avgas fire ... the core column was taken out at the level the planes crashed into, and this is where the collapsed occurred ... the lower part of the building remained intact until the top part slammed into it ... the folks you're relying on need to improve their photoshop skills I think ...

Do some homework before you waste my time anymore.

 

[ReinyDays]

I'm enjoying wasting your time ... you seem to have a lot of it to waste ...

 

[the other mike]

I'm enjoying wasting your time ... you seem to have a lot of it to waste ...

It's nice being able to work my own hours.
So do your homework about those famous "concrete core columns" yet?

 

[Skylar]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

Angelo is still stuck on 'silent explosives' and invisible thermite reactions. Falling objects accelerating under gravity and 'Force vectors' might be a little much to ask of him.

 

[ReinyDays]

You mean run a jack-hammer? ... concrete crumbles right quick ... how much experience do you have on construction sites? ... better yet, how much experience bringing buildings down? ...

 

[the other mike]

Back to ignore.
Not wasting another breath with you clowns.

5 pages of information on this thread after you dig through
the other 55 pages of clown clutter.

 

[Faun]

Back to ignore.
Not wasting another breath with you clowns.

LOLOLOL

This is now the fourth time, and counting, you're putting us clowns on ignore.

 

[the other mike]

Back to ignore.
Not wasting another breath with you clowns.

LOLOLOL

This is now the fourth time, and counting, you're putting us clowns on ignore.

I like you Faunzie.
Don't you know that ?

 

[ReinyDays]

Thank you Angelo ... I did want to ask Faun and Skylar about how involved the Saudis were ... blaming this on some slack-jawed yokel living in a cave somewhere in Povertonia seems far-fetched to me ... what think you two? ...

 

[Skylar]

Any chance we can get back to Angelo's free fall claims? ... I'm still puzzled why anyone would think objects falling don't accelerate ...

Not the way the steel core columns were in the twins....could never have happened the way

Says you. The same guy that insisted that constuction workers 'never' cut girders at 45 degree angles. You keep making these definitive statements that you can't back up.

they collapsed without somehow taking out the core columns.

Nonsense. The core columns only carried half the gravity load of the building. With the perimeter columns carrying the other half.

And ONLY when perfectly aligned with the columns above them, allowing them to transmit their load energy around each floor to the ground. Why then would they hold up to a massive debris field accelerated by gravity slamming into the entire floor?

The conversion of potential to kinetic energy was NOT what the core columns were designed to withstand. Worse, as the debris field continued to fall, it gained both mass and speed. Meaning that the impacts with lower floors had exponentially more energy than the impacts on higher floors.

If the first floor beneath the initial failure couldn't stop the collapse, there's nothing in the tower that could.....as the debris field would have more mass and speed, while the resistance of each floor was roughly the same, all the way to the ground.

Which is exactly what we saw on 911. Twice. No explosives required.

Your theory is not uselessly complicated and contradicted by overwhelming evidence....its also completely unnecessary.

The structure below, especially in the North tower that collapsed last, would have resisted the collapse and at least slowed it down. Newtons third law of motion and the design of the towers are in direct conflict with the NIST conclusions.

The NIST found that the building fell NEAR free fall speeds. Demonstrating slowing and obliterating your 'third law' conflicts. And if you watch the videos of the collapse, there was steel and concrete hitting the ground while the lower sections of the tower still stood. Demonstrating that the fall was slower than free fall. And took as much as 12.9 seconds.

http://www.911myths.com/WTC2Collapse.mpeg

Again, obliterating your 'third law' conflicts.

 

[the other mike]

 

[Skylar]

Back to ignore.
Not wasting another breath with you clowns.

5 pages of information on this thread after you dig through
the other 55 pages of clown clutter.

Again, it doesn't matter what you ignore.

As reasonable people can still see the evidence that obliterates your silly conspiracies even if you refuse to look at it. That's what you haven't figured out yet.

Its the evidence that convinces reasonable people. And you can't stop any of us from presenting it. Even when it overwhelmingly contradicts your conspiracy.

 

[the other mike]

Pop quiz on the WTC core columns tomorrow kids.
Class dismissed. PH3wood, Skyboy, J Edgar Faundino and Rainman , go to the office.
I'll be there with my aluminum thermite-coated paddle in 5 minutes.

 

[ph3iron]

Someone has to post at least 1 true conspiracy for every 50-75
MindWars - clutter- threads
or this board is a joke.

And btw "this again" ain't ever going away son.
Not until we get the truth. Now be a good troll and say;

Ah our old white fart posters.
Nothing better to do than to suck off their socialist SS Medicare and look for items that fit their zero college minds

 

[Skylar]

Pop quiz on the WTC core columns tomorrow kids.
Class dismissed. Skyboy and Rainman , go to the office.

Laughing.....you've never even watched the videos you're posting. You had no idea how many core columns there were until we told you. You had no idea how much of the gravity load the core columns were subject to compared to the perimeter columns.

You're consistently hamstrung by the fact that you're posting videos you've never watched, cutting and pasting arguments you don't understand.

 

[the other mike]

Ah our old white fart posters.
Nothing better to do than to suck off their socialist SS Medicare and look for items that fit their zero college minds

If you mean me, I haven't been to a doctor in 10 years, and since I quit smoking I still get it up without pills. And I went to college.

3 strikes you're out bitch

 

[ph3iron]

So are you sucking?

Ah our old white fart posters.
Nothing better to do than to suck off their socialist SS Medicare and look for items that fit their zero college minds

If you mean me, I haven't been to a doctor in 10 years, and since I quit smoking I still get it up without pills. And I went to college.

3 strikes you're out bitch

So you are sucking?
Don't call me when you get something serious.
College? PhD in which science again?
Couldn't resist Bitch? Nice