Manchin wants to raise age to 21 for gun purchases, doesn't see need for AR-15s

[miketx]

We should arm all the school children. There's no age limit in the Constitution.

You can stop proving how stupid you are. We get it.

 

[Dagosa]

The Supremes told the lower Courts to go back and rethink cases for challenges to laws like this.

It is illegal to ban AR-15s under the judgement of the Miller case.

If they are doing it, it’s not illegal. Every state has its own lawyers they consult before they make any laws.

 

[Flash]

If they are doing it, it’s not illegal. Every state has its own lawyers they consult before they make any laws.

A Legislature can disobey the law just like any other entity.

The Moon Bats seem to forget that the Miller ruling specifically addressed this. In Miller, the issue was the legality of a short-barreled shotgun. SCOTUS determined that it could be regulated because it was not suitable for use by the military or militia as a weapon of war. All the Moon Bats conveniently IGNORES this. You can't argue that the AR-15 is a weapon of war that is too dangerous for civilians to own and then obey the law by banning it after the Miller decision.

Also, Heller addressed the issue of banning classes of firearms like the AR-15:

"The handgun ban amounts to a prohibition of an entire class of “arms” that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose. The prohibition extends, moreover, to the home, where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Under any of the standards of scrutiny that we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights,[Footnote 27] banning from the home “the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family,” 478 F. 3d, at 400, would fail constitutional muster."



Antonin Scalia, DC v. Heller (2008) - from: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

 

[d0gbreath]

I would feel sorry for those that are 18, 19 and 20, which rules out anyone on here.

 

[Dagosa]

A Legislature can disobey the law just like any other entity.

The Moon Bats seem to forget that the Miller ruling specifically addressed this. In Miller, the issue was the legality of a short-barreled shotgun. SCOTUS determined that it could be regulated because it was not suitable for use by the military or militia as a weapon of war. All the Moon Bats conveniently IGNORES this. You can't argue that the AR-15 is a weapon of war that is too dangerous for civilians to own and then obey the law by banning it after the Miller decision.

Also, Heller addressed the issue of banning classes of firearms like the AR-15:

"The handgun ban amounts to a prohibition of an entire class of “arms” that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose. The prohibition extends, moreover, to the home, where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Under any of the standards of scrutiny that we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights,[Footnote 27] banning from the home “the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family,” 478 F. 3d, at 400, would fail constitutional muster."



Antonin Scalia, DC v. Heller (2008) - from: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

I see you left out that Heller needs to be qualified, register his handgun and the owner, Heller needs to be licensed. That makes your entire post a fraud.

 

[Flash]

I see you left out that Heller needs to be qualified, register his handgun and the owner, Heller needs to be licensed. That makes your entire post a fraud.

The Bruen case said that the states have to have either Constitutional Carry or "shall issue". That means that the licensing cannot be oppressive like the Democrat filth is doing.

After the Bruen case the Supremes also told the lower courts that had decided bans are legal to go back and get it right this time. They are giving the lower courts the opportunity to stop the oppression before accepting one of ban cases.

 

[miketx]

If they are doing it, it’s not illegal. Every state has its own lawyers they consult before they make any laws.

Ohhh golly, the jail house lawyer has spoke!

 

[Dagosa]

Ohhh golly, the jail house lawyer has spoke!

Oh, you and the rest of the Trump holes make the decision ? Nope, it’s made by the SC dufus.

 

[Dagosa]

The Bruen case said that the states have to have either Constitutional Carry or "shall issue". That means that the licensing cannot be oppressive like the Democrat filth is doing.

After the Bruen case the Supremes also told the lower courts that had decided bans are legal to go back and get it right this time. They are giving the lower courts the opportunity to stop the oppression before accepting one of ban cases.

Shall, will…..same old bullshit. Heller decided. The handgun needs to be registered, the owner needs to be licensed….in other words, your right to possess a handgun is LIMITED to only those who qualify.

 

[Flash]

Shall, will…..same old bullshit. Heller decided. The handgun needs to be registered, the owner needs to be licensed….in other words, your right to possess a handgun is LIMITED to only those who qualify.

You are confused Moon Bat.

The Bruen case severely limited what the filthy Liberals could use to "qualify".

The Democrat assholes in New York used oppressive criteria to determine qualification and the Supremes told them to cut that shit out.

You can never trust Liberals to be reasonable, can you?

 

[Jaxson]

You can stop proving how stupid you are. We get it.

Is there an age limit for the 2nd Amendment? I'll be waiting for your answer...

 

[miketx]

Is there an age limit for the 2nd Amendment? I'll be waiting for your answer...

Expected leftist spew. Always the same.

 

[miketx]

Oh, you and the rest of the Trump holes make the decision ? Nope, it’s made by the SC dufus.

Really liar? You're the jackass making claims! Stop lying. Same ole same ole leftard drivel.

 

[Jaxson]

Expected leftist spew. Always the same.

There's no age limit. My 6 year old kid should be able to be armed at school. And he already has more courage than all those fat fucks standing around in Uvalde.

 

[miketx]

There's no age limit. My 6 year old kid should be able to be armed at school. And he already has more courage than all those fat fucks standing around in Uvalde.

You can stop proving how stupid you are. People allow children access to guns end up in prison where your sorry ass belongs

 

[Jaxson]

You can stop proving how stupid you are. People allow children access to guns end up in prison where your sorry ass belongs

The 2nd says no such thing. You must be a communist.