Yep! and-----and every time a human shoots somebody, including themselves with a gun two things have to be present
A) a human
B) a gun
The name of the guy that shot himself hasn't been released (embarrassed?) but I wonder what his qualifications for carrying a weapon at a police convention was/is, is he mentally competent and-----and was his weapon registered and-----and is he among those well trained police officers that only hit their target about 30% of the time or-----or worse, when the well trained police officer is in a firefight they only hit their target about 18% of the time.
.
Aaaaaaand people who crash cars have to have two elements as well, the driver and the car.
A gun is a tool. It's no better or worse than the person using it, but, when a cost-benefit analysis is run, guns help far, far more than they hurt.
Let's put it in a way even a progressive can understand (but will still ignore) there are currently 300,000,000+guns in the hands of civilians in the US. They kill around 30,000 per year in a country of 330,000,000 people. The majority of those killed are bad guys killing bad guys. Add in the justifiable homicides by police and citizens (who kill twice as many bad guys as the police do), the accidents and the suicides and you are well below 1% of guns being used to do harm.
There are 800,000 doctors in the US. Every year they kill 120,000 people (last estimate by the AMA) do to misdiagnosis, malpractice, faulty drug prescriptions and just plain incompetence.
So you are FAR,
FAR more likely to die at the hands of a doctor than a gun. But, just like guns, doctors do more good than harm so we keep them around.