American education suck because the Christians try and teach genesis and the Noah's are real. Right away its doomed to failure.
Of course you're lying.
No I don't think so, esp in the southern states. Why in the world do they have an ark in Kentucky for. I am for separation of church and state and the line is getting very blurred.
Lets really be a Christian nation, bring back stoning , you know like the jews use to do. Lets go back to 1950, that is where we are heading with the Pubs in control.
By now, most readers recognize that your posts are never more than ignorance and prejudice. Luckily for you, I'm here with facts and remediation.
Let's prove that together.
The decline in American education is due entirely to the influence of communists....or, in the current parlance, Liberals.
1. The most important influence in the education of American children is John Dewey.
John Dewey was a communist dupe, a Potemkin Progressive. Yet, this man is
the greatest single influence on American schoolchildren; his books have been used to train generations of teachers. Even while the Russian civil war was still going on (some seven million killed between 1917 and 1921), Dewey’s books were translated into Russian by the Bolsheviks: they immediately recognized the importance of his ideas to the Soviet collective communist state.
- 1918, “School’s of Tomorrow,” published in Russian.
- 1919, “How We Think,” published in Russian.
- 1920, “The School and Society,” published in Russian.
- 1921, “Democracy and Education,” published in Russian. The English version, of course, became a bible at Columbia Teacher’s College.
2. "At a recent meeting of the New York Teaching Fellows program (“Teach for America”: provides an alternate route to state certification for about 1,700 new teachers annually) , Sol Stern found the one book that the fellows had to read in full was
Pedagogy of the Oppressed, by the Brazilian educator Paulo Freire.
T
his book has achieved near-iconic status in America’s teacher-training programs. In 2003, David Steiner and Susan Rozen published a study examining the curricula of 16 schools of education—14 of them among the top-ranked institutions in the country, according to
U.S. News and World Report—and found that
Pedagogy of the Oppressed was one of the most frequently assigned texts in their philosophy of education courses.
a. Freire isn’t interested in the Western tradition’s leading education thinkers—... He cites a rather different set of figures:
Marx, Lenin, Mao, Che Guevara, and Fidel Castro, as well as the radical intellectuals Frantz Fanon, Régis Debray, Herbert Marcuse, Jean-Paul Sartre, Louis Althusser, and Georg Lukács. And no wonder, since Freire’s main idea is that the central contradiction of every society is between the “oppressors” and the “oppressed” and that revolution should resolve their conflict. The “oppressed” are, moreover, destined to develop a “pedagogy” that leads them to their own liberation.
b.
[H]e relies on Marx’s standard formulation that “the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat [and] this dictatorship only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society.”
Pedagogy of the Oppressor
Another reason why U.S. ed schools are so awful: the ongoing influence of Brazilian Marxist Paulo Freire
Pedagogy of the Oppressor
I rammed your lying words right back down your throat, huh?
Hope you enjoyed it.....I did.
