Mainstream media done stepped in it now!

[hazlnut]

The Hill: Breitbart News Planning Lawsuit Against 'Major Media Company'

I love it. Slander people and you WILL get sued.

OK lets take bets on who it is!? I say CNN! My second guess would be MSNBC!

That's like the burglar suing the homeowner when he slips and falls.

 

[Preacher]

Only in a loony left wing world can the media attempt to defame a Jewish run company founded by a Jew by calling them white supremicists and anti Semites.



OMG this is going to be good.

Exactly.. Alt right are all white nationalists -- like EVERY poster on USMB is a white nationalist.
We keep a few around here -- just to keep an eye on them..

What happened to "Stronger Together"?? Were there exclusions that I didnt read about in the fine print? Sometimes people crash the party. Happens all the freakin time. Being a white nationalist must be a lonely gigue --- right Mr. OP??

Truthfully, How much time exactly did you ever spend at that crappy alt-right interest group?

Nope not lonely at all. MILLIONS of us know each other....we communicate through many sources and LOVE using Twitter and FB to push our platform.I don't consider myself a white nationalist but I suppose if there was an umbrella group that we all fit under that would be it. I am on the fringe of that....some are suit and tie I am boots and jeans and t shirt but I am also on the fringe as far as ideology I am a White Supremacist and my religion once was huge but is fairly small now in population but gaining steam fast especially as christianity destroys its self.

Yeah --- well WE have Millions too in the Jewish Zionist conspiracy. But we don't use the tweets or the Facebook, we have dinner together. All of us.. At great Chinese restaurants. In the "private" rooms...

Shhhhhhhhh ..

Uh huh.....Its more like boardrooms and private conferences....

The Hill: Breitbart News Planning Lawsuit Against 'Major Media Company'

I love it. Slander people and you WILL get sued.

OK lets take bets on who it is!? I say CNN! My second guess would be MSNBC!

That's like the burglar suing the homeowner when he slips and falls.

Not hardly. Just because you see something doesn't mean there is something. You libtards are scared of your own damn shadows.

 

[skye]

Mainstream media done stepped in it now!


The mainstream media has been stepping in it for years. Only difference now, is that they're getting caught.

I agree.

They are not only getting caught and stepping in it. but they will have to eat it too.

 

[my2¢]

I'll guess he's after Foundation For National Progress (Mother Jones, The Media Consortium). If he goes through with it then it should be an interesting fight with my initial thought that he's the underdog in this battle.

 

[bripat9643]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

 

[bripat9643]

Trump is a legal loser at these. Now Briebart weighs in. So long as Briebart contained "news" that tended to show white nationalism, they lose. They can't win, because such people like Shapiro and Beck are on record of naming instances. But winning is not really their point.

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-embraces-the-alt-right-cd91cc889154#.wjhvwm5fj

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. You proved that when you cited thinkprogress.org. You can't even define "white nationalism," let alone demonstrate that Brietbart published anything resembling it.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

 

[bripat9643]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

 

[bripat9643]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Sources report that Breitbart's main defense is pointing out that one of it's best friends is black

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

 

[bripat9643]

"Defense" of what?

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

People don't think you're "just ******* around" when they get a summons.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Well they're going to have to prove that they're not a white nationalist organization, which I don't think they can successfully do, and then they're going to have to prove that people aren't allowed to voice their opinions, which they probably can't successfully do either.

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

People don't think you're "just ******* around" when they get a summons.

People also don't take Breitbart seriously.

 

[bripat9643]

No, the defendant will to prove that Breitbart is a "white nationalist" organization. That will be rather difficult since the term is virtually meaningless. John F. Kennedy would qualify as one the way dim bulbs like you use the term.

Calling someone a "white nationalist" isn't an opinion. It's a smear.

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

People don't think you're "just ******* around" when they get a summons.

People also don't take Breitbart seriously.

If that's the case, then why are all you douche bags attacking it so fiercely?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Nah the defendant doesn't have to prove anything. Either Breitbart's lying and won't pursue anything or it'll get thrown out.

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

People don't think you're "just ******* around" when they get a summons.

People also don't take Breitbart seriously.

If that's the case, then why are all you douche bags attacking it so fiercely?

Attacking? I'm just making fun. You nutters go apeshit when it comes to your white nationalist opinion organizations.

 

[bripat9643]

Lack of any tangible evidence that Breitbart is "white nationalist" is all the proof they need. If someone calls you a rapist and they can't produce a shred of evidence that you raped anyone, you can sue the for Slander and win.

Not the same thing. Breitbart is just showboating. Like Trump when he talks about Mexico paying for a wall. Everyone knows they're just ******* around.

People don't think you're "just ******* around" when they get a summons.

People also don't take Breitbart seriously.

If that's the case, then why are all you douche bags attacking it so fiercely?

Attacking? I'm just making fun. You nutters go apeshit when it comes to your white nationalist opinion organizations.

That's liberal for "attacking." Anyone who uses the term "white nationalist" is a scum bag douche bag.