So why cant you quote me saying that?Meanwhile your buddy asslips claims that every lynching was done by the KKK.Oh gee, I'm crushed.
You're also the assclown who brought that shit in in a desperate attempt to swat the topic away -- now you run away from it. As already noted, lynching was not a political act but a cultural one.
Apparently that distinction is beyond the scope of whatever passes for intellect between your ears.
Meanwhile your buddy asslips claims that every lynching was done by the KKK.Oh gee, I'm crushed.
You're also the assclown who brought that shit in in a desperate attempt to swat the topic away -- now you run away from it. As already noted, lynching was not a political act but a cultural one.
Apparently that distinction is beyond the scope of whatever passes for intellect between your ears.
Asslips repeatedly demanded I provide proof that any lynching was not done by the KKK, pretty clear he insists all were done by them.Meanwhile your buddy asslips claims that every lynching was done by the KKK.Oh gee, I'm crushed.
You're also the assclown who brought that shit in in a desperate attempt to swat the topic away -- now you run away from it. As already noted, lynching was not a political act but a cultural one.
Apparently that distinction is beyond the scope of whatever passes for intellect between your ears.
IIRC it was closed caption that made that statement.
Your confusion is understandable however, they all have the same rhetoric straight from the NOI playbook
Asslips repeatedly demanded I provide proof that any lynching was not done by the KKK, pretty clear he insists all were done by them.Meanwhile your buddy asslips claims that every lynching was done by the KKK.Oh gee, I'm crushed.
You're also the assclown who brought that shit in in a desperate attempt to swat the topic away -- now you run away from it. As already noted, lynching was not a political act but a cultural one.
Apparently that distinction is beyond the scope of whatever passes for intellect between your ears.
IIRC it was closed caption that made that statement.
Your confusion is understandable however, they all have the same rhetoric straight from the NOI playbook
Bizarre. They were done by rural peoples who did not have urban access to court systems at the time. Squarely Democrats at the time, as it was the party of the agrarian people as opposed to the big city Republicans.
Youre stretching but not able to reach far enough to make a coherent argument. Why would it mention the Black on white crime rate? That has nothing to do with lynchings by white conservatives unless you want to say the Black on white crime rate are part of the legacy of lynchings. You reap what you sew. Chickens coming home to roost. Karma and all that other good stuff.Asslips repeatedly demanded I provide proof that any lynching was not done by the KKK, pretty clear he insists all were done by them.Meanwhile your buddy asslips claims that every lynching was done by the KKK.Oh gee, I'm crushed.
You're also the assclown who brought that shit in in a desperate attempt to swat the topic away -- now you run away from it. As already noted, lynching was not a political act but a cultural one.
Apparently that distinction is beyond the scope of whatever passes for intellect between your ears.
IIRC it was closed caption that made that statement.
Your confusion is understandable however, they all have the same rhetoric straight from the NOI playbook
lynching is a crime, but when confronted with the facts that blacks are more violent than the KKK they are strangely silent.
The study mentioned in the OP conveniently did not mention the black on white crime rate. No surprise as then blacks no longer can claim having the moral high ground.
Their angle for racial extortion would be null if everyone knew the truth. I'm here to extoll that truth.
ps asslicker talks in circles , answers questions with questions, and dodges direct questions
Cave chimp preschool school response. ^
Let me note you have no problem with Asslips racism but do have a problem with a white persons?
In other words you think it is ok for blacks to be racist but not whites. Guess what? You are wrong.
Wrong again. The racist here is asslips and you are making excuses for him. You admit that the white guys are racist and then claim because they are that forgives asslips for being one. You keep defending asslips racism. His is overt and telling, he hates white people, you included. he uses white women but he hates white men. And you defend him.
