Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I really wonder why they hate America. They all reap its rewardsYou ever wonder why the demstains always support traitors and criminal scum?Too funny maybe some day you might understand our constitution, or not
The criminal carnage must end. I'm not sure if Trump* is a mafia mob boss or the anti-Christ - or a combination of both.
A guy that should be looking forward to his posting in the Arctic.What do you call a lt col that went outside command? To take out his commander?Consequences consequences. If he didn’t know he’d have been disciplined for a coup he didn’t belong there.Vindman Twins off to their new digs!
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, arriving Tuesday on Capitol Hill to testify in the impeachment inquiry.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, who heard President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s president and was alarmed, testified that he tried and failed to add key details to the rough transcript.
WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.
The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.
More: Account of Trump’s Ukraine Call Omitted Key Details, Official Testifies
I salute Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman for his service and patriotism! Someone has to answer for this.
Lieutenant Colonel Vindman is being punished for telling the truth. His brother, who had nothing to do with what Vindman did, is being punished by blood, something that countries like North Korea do. So you must know that is wrong, and if you don't then you're just another sad, sick, pathetic, lying sack of shit traitor like 45.
Colonel Vindman told the truth. You support and condone the actions an individual who has never served in the U.S. Military. He is draft dodging piece of shit coward who attacks Gold Star Families and on Men who served their country while as a Prisoner of War that 45 lied his off about "Bone Spurs" that made him a draft dodging piece of shit.
Democracies do not punish people, civilian or military who speak truth to power, even when truth means a sitting president solicited assistance from a foreign power in order to effect the outcome of U.S. Presidential Election.
The Cheating, Lying Piece of Shit Coward 45 knows he can only win by cheating.
And that truly says it all.
he was a participant of taking out his commander
Oh...it's about the pretend coup again. Let me know when there is a real one.
It depends on what your opinion is. If you are a progressive then you want what is bad for this country and you deserve it. If you are a patriot then progressive scum are calling you that and they are of no account.Problem, I express my opinion you call me a fucktard & a turd. This site is becoming famous for substituting insults in place of reason or facts.;
Or a court martial.A guy that should be looking forward to his posting in the Arctic.What do you call a lt col that went outside command? To take out his commander?Consequences consequences. If he didn’t know he’d have been disciplined for a coup he didn’t belong there.Vindman Twins off to their new digs!
Lieutenant Colonel Vindman is being punished for telling the truth. His brother, who had nothing to do with what Vindman did, is being punished by blood, something that countries like North Korea do. So you must know that is wrong, and if you don't then you're just another sad, sick, pathetic, lying sack of shit traitor like 45.
Colonel Vindman told the truth. You support and condone the actions an individual who has never served in the U.S. Military. He is draft dodging piece of shit coward who attacks Gold Star Families and on Men who served their country while as a Prisoner of War that 45 lied his off about "Bone Spurs" that made him a draft dodging piece of shit.
Democracies do not punish people, civilian or military who speak truth to power, even when truth means a sitting president solicited assistance from a foreign power in order to effect the outcome of U.S. Presidential Election.
The Cheating, Lying Piece of Shit Coward 45 knows he can only win by cheating.
And that truly says it all.
he was a participant of taking out his commander
Oh...it's about the pretend coup again. Let me know when there is a real one.
Problem, I express my opinion you call me a fucktard & a turd. This site is becoming famous for substituting insults in place of reason or facts.;
i heard he told the Ukraine PM not to listen to trump! I went huh? Who voted for that fk? Trump runs policies, if vindman didn’t like them, he could have just requested out! Not create a coupOr a court martial.A guy that should be looking forward to his posting in the Arctic.What do you call a lt col that went outside command? To take out his commander?Consequences consequences. If he didn’t know he’d have been disciplined for a coup he didn’t belong there.Lieutenant Colonel Vindman is being punished for telling the truth. His brother, who had nothing to do with what Vindman did, is being punished by blood, something that countries like North Korea do. So you must know that is wrong, and if you don't then you're just another sad, sick, pathetic, lying sack of shit traitor like 45.
Colonel Vindman told the truth. You support and condone the actions an individual who has never served in the U.S. Military. He is draft dodging piece of shit coward who attacks Gold Star Families and on Men who served their country while as a Prisoner of War that 45 lied his off about "Bone Spurs" that made him a draft dodging piece of shit.
Democracies do not punish people, civilian or military who speak truth to power, even when truth means a sitting president solicited assistance from a foreign power in order to effect the outcome of U.S. Presidential Election.
The Cheating, Lying Piece of Shit Coward 45 knows he can only win by cheating.
And that truly says it all.
he was a participant of taking out his commander
Oh...it's about the pretend coup again. Let me know when there is a real one.
From GreenlandLt. Colonel Vindman will have the last laugh.
You have the best stories rosie...tell us the one about mueller again, the one where he "runs silent runs deep"Lt. Colonel Vindman will have the last laugh.
Or doesn’t know what’s in his own report!You have the best stories rosie...tel us the on about mueller again, the one where he "runs silent runs deep"Lt. Colonel Vindman will have the last laugh.
Do Patriots usually tell prime ministers to ignore the president’s policies? That’s what I call a traitor.Lt. Col. Vindman is a patriot
When a civilian becomes a commissioned officer in the United States Armed Forces, she or he swears an oath to uphold the Constitution. Indeed, the language of the oath is unique as evidenced by this section: “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion … .”
This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress (“White House Ukraine expert sought to correct transcript of Trump call,” New York Times, Oct. 30). Twice between 1975 and 1980, the Supreme Court determined that it is unconstitutional to restrict military personnel from addressing Congress, and the Constitution’s framers expected military members to do so.
The problem with that is when determining truth is how do you know any of that is why he really did it?...it's just more misdirection...If someone who is a plant by the opposition would do and claim exactly what Vindman did and the above would still hold true even if it was completely false...the above also makes it clear that Vindman was free to give and use his "ownopinion" as to whether it was questionable, and questionable does not = wrong.This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress
Lt. Col. Vindman is a patriot
When a civilian becomes a commissioned officer in the United States Armed Forces, she or he swears an oath to uphold the Constitution. Indeed, the language of the oath is unique as evidenced by this section: “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion … .”
This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress (“White House Ukraine expert sought to correct transcript of Trump call,” New York Times, Oct. 30). Twice between 1975 and 1980, the Supreme Court determined that it is unconstitutional to restrict military personnel from addressing Congress, and the Constitution’s framers expected military members to do so.
The problem with that is when determining truth is how do you know any of that is why he really did it?...it's just more misdirection...If someone who is a plant by the opposition would do and claim exactly what Vindman did and the above would still hold true even if it was completely false...the above also makes it clear that Vindman was free to give and use his "ownopinion" as to whether it was questionable, and questionable does not = wrong.This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress
Looks like you never heard of chain of command. You people know so much that just isn't so.Lt. Col. Vindman is a patriot
When a civilian becomes a commissioned officer in the United States Armed Forces, she or he swears an oath to uphold the Constitution. Indeed, the language of the oath is unique as evidenced by this section: “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion … .”
This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress (“White House Ukraine expert sought to correct transcript of Trump call,” New York Times, Oct. 30). Twice between 1975 and 1980, the Supreme Court determined that it is unconstitutional to restrict military personnel from addressing Congress, and the Constitution’s framers expected military members to do so.
Lt. Col. Vindman is a patriot
When a civilian becomes a commissioned officer in the United States Armed Forces, she or he swears an oath to uphold the Constitution. Indeed, the language of the oath is unique as evidenced by this section: “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion … .”
This oath means that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman had a duty to report activity he considered to be legally questionable and was within this duty to testify before Congress (“White House Ukraine expert sought to correct transcript of Trump call,” New York Times, Oct. 30). Twice between 1975 and 1980, the Supreme Court determined that it is unconstitutional to restrict military personnel from addressing Congress, and the Constitution’s framers expected military members to do so.
Do Patriots usually tell prime ministers to ignore the president’s policies? That’s what I call a traitor.
From prison.Lt. Colonel Vindman will have the last laugh.
