Lou Dobbs: Mexican Govt Interfering in US Presidential Election

[protectionist]

Sweet baby Jesus you people can sure dig up some ignorant crap.

The problem you have are the LEGAL American voting Hispanics in this country. 17% of the population, or 23 million of them that are now solidly in Hillary Clinton's column because of Donald Trump and his attacks on them. This when the GOP nominee, since Reagan needed 40% of this block to win the White House. This year is 46% and Trump is polling at an Historic Negative 80%. They don't need any help from diplomats trying to get papers for illegals--LOL.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him

Idiot post. Like many high-falutin "studies" these aren't studies at all. They are propaganda trash designed to silence the opponents of the illegal invasion of the US by Mexican et al foreigners, raiding our economy and treasuries. Trump will solidly defeat Hillary (or whomever), with or without the "Hispanic vote". And there really isn't any Hispanic vote.

As a partial Hispanic myself, I can attest that there are million of American Hispanics who support Trump, who don't fall prey to your stupid race card, and who have already voted for Trump in the primaries, helping him to win in Nevada, and other ststes, which is one of the reason why he is beating his opponents to shreds. You think Hispanics in America care about these lowlife, illegal alien wetbacks stealing our jobs, and raiding our economy and treasuries ? One would have to be braindead to think that.

Shawn Bombaro is the creator of the Latinos Support Trump fan page on Facebook. As of March 12, it had more than 730 followers. Bombaro says social media groups like his are debunking the rhetoric on the left that Trump has no Hispanic support.

And guess where Trump beat his 2 Hispanic primary rivals (Rubio and Cruz) > in none other that America's MOST HISPANIC CITY, Laredo, Texas, with a 96% Hispanic population.

Donald Trump's Latinos: Voters Talk About Why They're Supporting His Presidential Bid

Trump Wins In America’s Most Hispanic City

And you want to talk about polls ? OK. A June 2014 poll funded by Facebook showed that 78 percent of Hispanics favored “substantially increasing” security at the U.S.-Mexican border, 77 percent want companies to check their employees’ work eligibility, and 76 percent want the government to identify people who overstay their visas.

The new YouGov poll also asked which GOP candidate can best handle the immigration issue.

The result showed that Trump’s emphasis on repatriation for illegals and jobs for Americans was favored by 2:1 or 3:1 over the establishment’s preference for amnesty for illegals, jobs for foreign labor, and lower-wages for Americans.

Poll: Trump Gets More Hispanic Support Than Romney in 2012

 

[protectionist]

Protectionist is just anti-Hispanic nativism, representing a small group of American, nothing more.

This is RACISM posted by a racist, JAkeStarkey, who, conveniently for him, uses the race card to try to push through his anti-Trump agenda. To him, Hispanics are just a TOOL to be used and abused. Shame on JS for taking this lowlife approach. His dopey race card tactic was obsolete over 20 years ago, from the OJ Simpson trial. How pathetic and disgraceful.

 

[JakeStarkey]

protection is racist. He tries to deny by accusing those who point out his racism by calling them racist. That is an easy tactic to expose as I have just done. Thus, his racism is a tool to suppress the Hispanic vote.

Here is the fact that protectionist abhors: 1 out of 6 voters is now Hispanic, and 80 to 85% of them abhor Trump.

 

[protectionist]

protection is racist. He tries to deny by accusing those who point out his racism by calling them racist. That is an easy tactic to expose as I have just done. Thus, his racism is a tool to suppress the Hispanic vote.

Here is the fact that protectionist abhors: 1 out of 6 voters is now Hispanic, and 80 to 85% of them abhor Trump.

Only a pathetic, liberal lowlife like Joke Starkey could go around pretending to be honorable and sincere, while hiding behind his ever-present race card, he pushes his agenda trying to silence his opposition. He tries to deny by accusing those who point out his racism, by calling them racist. That is an easy tactic to expose, as I have just done. Thus, his racism is a tool to suppress the Trump vote, as well as trying to recruit Hispanics to his own lunatic fringe liberal flock. Shameful, Degenerate, Sad.

Of course as Jokey throws numbers around he doesn't mention that a large % of them are ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS, and enemies of America (who he allies himself with), like the wetbacks, currently waving Mexican flags in the street outside Trump appearances in California.

These dirtbags only get away with this (instead of being arrested by ICE) because of such Mexican collarator traitors like Barrack Obama, Jerry Brown, and treasonous mayors of cites the wetbacks protest/riot in. In normal places, with normal leaders they'd be jailed immediately, and their treasonous filth Mexican flags wold re ripped out their hands, spit on, stompted on, and burned to ashes, as they should be.

After Trump becomes president, these freaks won't dare wave their rotten rags around, .knowing they'd be shoved right down their throats.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Telling the truth about the facts is honorable and sincere.

To deny them like protectionist is dishonorable and insincere.

 

[protectionist]

Telling the truth about the facts is honorable and sincere.

To deny them like protectionist is dishonorable and insincere.

Telling the truth about the facts is honorable and sincere.

To deny them like JokeStarkey is dishonorable and insincere. Moreover it is TREASONOUS, and warranting of the death penalty.

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2381 > Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Telling the truth about the facts is honorable and sincere.

To deny them like protectionist is dishonorable and insincere.

Telling the truth about the facts is honorable and sincere.

To deny them like JokeStarkey is dishonorable and insincere. Moreover it is TREASONOUS, and warranting of the death penalty.

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2381 > Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Your interpretation of the US Code is silly. To misinterpret deliberately like protectionist is treasonous.

 

[JakeStarkey]

What is a hoot is the healthmyths, protectionist, and shootspeeders are all brothers living in their parents' basement.

 

[protectionist]

Your interpretation of the US Code is silly. To misinterpret deliberately like protectionist is treasonous.

Ah yes "interpretation". Another of the prominent liberal tool-words. Usually used when talking about the Koran or Islam in general, but they'll use it whenever it might be handy for them.

I don't know how "adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort" is supposed to have been misinterpreted, but liberals have never let logic and common sense stop them before, so no need for it to do that now either. Ho hum.

 

[protectionist]

What is a hoot is the healthmyths, protectionist, and shootspeeders are all brothers living in their parents' basement.

WHO ? HAH ? WHAAA ? Is there a doctor in the house ?

 

[JakeStarkey]

protectionist is giving us his weird interpretation of the US Code without give us any case law.

He suffers the same illness as healthmyths and shootspeeders: he thinks his interpretation is fact.

 

[protectionist]

protectionist is giving us his weird interpretation of the US Code without give us any case law.

He suffers the same illness as healthmyths and shootspeeders: he thinks his interpretation is fact.

There he goes with his "interpretation" tool again. This is supposed to be saying that no one has been arrested and executed for treason ? We don't need case law. All we need is the law itself (which you are in violation of) Liberals think they can trick their way out of being held accountable. Sorry liberals. The law is the law. Simple as that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

protectionist is giving us his weird interpretation of the US Code without give us any case law.

He suffers the same illness as healthmyths and shootspeeders: he thinks his interpretation is fact.

There he goes with his "interpretation" tool again. This is supposed to be saying that no one has been arrested and executed for treason ? We don't need case law. All we need is the law itself (which you are in violation of) Liberals think they can trick their way out of being held accountable. Sorry liberals. The law is the law. Simple as that.

I am saying you have no proof for your interpretation. What you say is laughable. You must be a millennial.

 

[protectionist]

I am saying you have no proof for your interpretation. What you say is laughable. You must be a millennial.

HA HA HA. How funny to see liberals call ordinary American English words "interpretation" This odd crutch is critical for liberals. They can't let go of it. To them, it's a way of dealing with reality that they can't/won't deal with, and (they think) enables them to be insulated from the truth. They think all they have to do is label anything they don't like as being somebody's "interpretation", and they'll be safe from this uncomfortable (for them) reality.

"Proof" is another one of these sugary shields they rely on. Demanding proof for things that are self-evident, and/or have been proven numerous times. So is the invalidation card (like the race card) which they use to protect themselves from being shown to be the nutjobs that they are, and the nutty things they talk about and support (ex Affirmative Action) Claiming things or writers are invalid so as to keep themselves free from their criticisms.

This pathology varies from mild detachment from reality supported by these typical crutches, to wildly extreme nut cases like the 2006 Santa Barbara Post Office mass killer Jennifer San Marco, who also authored "The Racist Press" envisioning wild exaggerations and conspiracy theories of Nazis, KKK, etc The newsletter included error-laden explanations of various religions and a confusing theory linking the U.S. government to "Son of Sam" killer David Berkowitz, the Ku Klux Klan and racist murders.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And you continue along like a buffoon, like the man behind the curtain, puffing your assertion.

 

[protectionist]

And you continue along like a buffoon, like the man behind the curtain, puffing your assertion.

You know how I know so much about liberals ? I used to BE one. AGHHHHH!! That's OK. I recovered. Got deprogrammed, and am perfectly healthy now.