Looks like Hurricane Milton is gonna be huge...Now a Cat 4

[ding]

Unfortunately, no. You're an uneducated slob with no experience or education in any related field.

No, you have no outsmarted the scientists. You are embarrassing yourself.

We've been over this.

So you don't believe that when the northern hemisphere deglaciates that the oceans and atmosphere warm?

Because what do you think this data is showing?

 

[ding]

Unfortunately, no. You're an uneducated slob with no experience or education in any related field.

No, you have no outsmarted the scientists. You are embarrassing yourself.

We've been over this.

Do you understand that the surface of the planet is not heated evenly by the sun? Do you need a climate scientist to tell you that?

 

[odanny]

My neighbor got damn lucky, the north side of the hurricane, the "dirty side" went over St. Pete and the winds were coming from the east (inland) and actually pushing water out of Tampa Bay and back into the Gulf. Had it of tracked further north she would have lost her home from storm surge.

 

[ding]

My neighbor got damn lucky, the north side of the hurricane, the "dirty side" went over St. Pete and the winds were coming from the east (inland) and actually pushing water out of Tampa Bay and back into the Gulf. Had it of tracked further north she would have lost her home from storm surge.

The dirty side would have been south of the eye as the storm was traveling west to east.

 

[odanny]

The dirty side would have been south of the eye as the storm was traveling east to west.

Yes, you are right, the dirty side is the south side, the side that brings in the storm surge. St. Pete and Tampa Bay got very lucky they avoided the dirty side, their good fortune was someone else's destruction.

 

[EMH]

You're the one arguing for AGW, dummy. I'm showing the data which shows the atmosphere does not drive the climate of the planet.

You have NO DATA and NO TRUTH.

What proves the atmosphere is not the cause is the fact that

GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED


and your lying cocksucking taxpayer funded ass doesn't accept that, because if the public did, you would be unemployed.

 

[ding]

You have NO DATA and NO TRUTH.

What proves the atmosphere is not the cause is the fact that

GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED


and your lying cocksucking taxpayer funded ass doesn't accept that, because if the public did, you would be unemployed.

I have the entire geologic record of data. You jerk off in the bathroom.

 

[EMH]

I have the entire geologic record of data. You jerk off in the bathroom.

You have FUDGED FRAUD you call the "geologic record of data."

The OP here destroys your narrative completely...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ding]

You have FUDGED FRAUD you call the "geologic record of data."

The OP here destroys your narrative completely...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Incorrect, fudge packer. Oxygen isotope measurements are considered highly accurate, especially when analyzed using modern mass spectrometry techniques, providing a reliable tool for studying past climates and geological processes due to their good reproducibility and sensitivity to environmental changes; however, accuracy can be affected by factors like sample preparation, matrix effects, and the specific analytical method used, with precision often reported in the range of 0.2‰ (per mil) or better.

 

[EMH]

Incorrect, fudge packer. Oxygen isotope measurements are considered highly accurate, especially when analyzed using modern mass spectrometry techniques, providing a reliable tool for studying past climates and geological processes due to their good reproducibility and sensitivity to environmental changes; however, accuracy can be affected by factors like sample preparation, matrix effects, and the specific analytical method used, with precision often reported in the range of 0.2‰ (per mil) or better.

There is no evidence of any "precision" since there is no way of testing it. It is a flat out guess, and isotopes are altered by volcano eruptions and meteor asteroid hits.

Your entire existence on USMB is based on a pile of Paul Pelosi's used underwear....

and you cannot refute one word of that link...

 

[ding]

There is no evidence of any "precision" since there is no way of testing it. It is a flat out guess, and isotopes are altered by volcano eruptions and meteor asteroid hits.

Your entire existence on USMB is based on a pile of Paul Pelosi's used underwear....

and you cannot refute one word of that link...

Post a link that disputes oxygen isotopes, fudge packer.

 

[EMH]

Post a link that disputes oxygen isotopes, fudge packer.

since you have no link testing and validating the bullshit isotope "temperatures" since there are no other temp records and isotopes are formed in many ways that have nothing to do with a "global temperature"

 

[ding]

since you have no link testing and validating the bullshit isotope "temperatures" since there are no other temp records and isotopes are formed in many ways that have nothing to do with a "global temperature"

I've posted so many links on the validity of oxygen isotope curves I can only assume you are either crazy or acting. Which is it? Because no one can be as dumb as you are portraying yourself.

 

[EMH]

I've posted so many links on the validity of oxygen isotope curves I can only assume you are either crazy or acting. Which is it? Because no one can be as dumb as you are portraying yourself.

A quote from a taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUDster doesn't cut it.

isotopes can be varied by many factors

This is, at best, seriously dirty and unreliable data, not controlled at all. Most likely it is simply 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD as usual.

 

[ding]

A quote from a taxpayer funded Co2 FRAUDster doesn't cut it.

isotopes can be varied by many factors

This is, at best, seriously dirty and unreliable data, not controlled at all. Most likely it is simply 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD as usual.

There are several types of evidence for glacial cycles, including:

• Geological evidence
  Glaciers leave behind geological evidence such as striations, which are scratches or grooves left by glaciers dragging rocks against bedrock. Other geological evidence includes glacial moraines, drumlins, valley cutting, and tillites, which are deposits of poorly sorted sediment that have turned to rock.
  
  
  
• Ice cores
  Ice cores from Greenland contain chemicals that indicate the climate when the ice was formed.
  
  
  
• Rock deposits from the ocean floor
  Rock deposits from the ocean floor contain chemicals that indicate the climate when the rocks were formed.
  
  
  
• Diatom fossils
  The nitrogen isotopes in the silica shells of diatoms, which are floating algae that grow in Antarctic surface waters, vary with the amount of unused nitrogen in the surface water.

 

[EMH]

There are several types of evidence for glacial cycles, including:

• Geological evidence
  Glaciers leave behind geological evidence such as striations, which are scratches or grooves left by glaciers dragging rocks against bedrock. Other geological evidence includes glacial moraines, drumlins, valley cutting, and tillites, which are deposits of poorly sorted sediment that have turned to rock.
  
  
  
• Ice cores
  Ice cores from Greenland contain chemicals that indicate the climate when the ice was formed.
  
  
  
• Rock deposits from the ocean floor
  Rock deposits from the ocean floor contain chemicals that indicate the climate when the rocks were formed.
  
  
  
• Diatom fossils
  The nitrogen isotopes in the silica shells of diatoms, which are floating algae that grow in Antarctic surface waters, vary with the amount of unused nitrogen in the surface water.

This is hilariously misleading...

1. the scratches can be interpreted "differently" apparently since your side says something very different than was accepted 12 years ago. In fact, during the summer, an advancing ice age like Greenland was 2 million - 700 years ago will "retreat" a few inches during summer. For the year as a whole, it advanced 10 feet. That doesn't change the fact that the Greenland ice sheet began up north 1-2 million years ago and moved south, only in the 1400s freezing out life on the southern tip... the vikings, well documented history, and a central talking point of the 1970s global COOLING scam.

2. ice cores completely refute "interglacials" since Greenland and AA grew new ice layers straight through the "interglacial"

Fossils and rocks are evidence, and precisely none of that supports "glacials"

The "glacials" are the Co2 FRAUD's attempt to escape the indisputable truth that

Greenland froze while North America thawed

 

[ding]

This is hilariously misleading...

1. the scratches can be interpreted "differently" apparently since your side says something very different than was accepted 12 years ago. In fact, during the summer, an advancing ice age like Greenland was 2 million - 700 years ago will "retreat" a few inches during summer. For the year as a whole, it advanced 10 feet. That doesn't change the fact that the Greenland ice sheet began up north 1-2 million years ago and moved south, only in the 1400s freezing out life on the southern tip... the vikings, well documented history, and a central talking point of the 1970s global COOLING scam.

2. ice cores completely refute "interglacials" since Greenland and AA grew new ice layers straight through the "interglacial"

Fossils and rocks are evidence, and precisely none of that supports "glacials"

The "glacials" are the Co2 FRAUD's attempt to escape the indisputable truth that

Greenland froze while North America thawed

It's just empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.