Look what I found

[freyasman]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

 

[Blues Man]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

 

[freyasman]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

 

[Blues Man]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

 

[freyasman]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

There are a lot of bullshit laws on the books.

 

[Blues Man]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

There are a lot of bullshit laws on the books.

And you don't get to break them without consequences.

 

[freyasman]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

There are a lot of bullshit laws on the books.

And you don't get to break them without consequences.

I ignore them every single day.


Come and get me.

 

[Blues Man]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

There are a lot of bullshit laws on the books.

And you don't get to break them without consequences.

I ignore them every single day.


Come and get me.

so you ignore gun laws every single day?

Then you sir are part of the problem not to mention a fucking hypocrite

 

[freyasman]

Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse's Attackers been Arrested and Charged?

What crimes may the men who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse be charged with? Why haven't they been charged?

www.ammoland.com

From the link;
Read more: Why haven't Kyle Rittenhouse' Attackers been Arrested and Charged?
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

"Numerous felonies appear to have been committed against Rittenhouse by the three attackers. One attacker, Anthony Huber, is dead.

What charges might be brought against the other two attackers?
As there were multiple, coordinated attacks, they could be charged with conspiracy to commit a felony, under Wisconsin statutes 939.31.

The first, unknown attacker, clearly committed battery against Kyle Rittenhouse with the flying kick attack; because it was countered, the damage may not have been great, making it a Class A misdemeanor under Wisconsin statutes 940.19.

Huber committed a battery, but Huber is dead, so he will not be charged. Because he died, however, in the commission of a crime, the other two combatants may be charged with felony murder, Wisconsin statute 940.30. All three attackers were acting in concert, so the felony murder statute is likely to apply.

Grosskreutz could be charged under the endangering safety by use of a deadly weapon, statute, 941.20, for his actions with the semi-automatic pistol. 941.20 has an exception for defense of privilege of self-defense, or defense of others, which Grosskreutz might claim, and which Rittenhouse is already claiming in his lawyers' statement.

The Kenosha County Prosecutor has decided to press charges against Kyle Rittenhouse, and not against his attackers. This shows a reluctance, almost certainly due to political pressure, not to charge the rioters. All three attackers appear to be from Wisconsin, so there is no interstate nexus for federal charges, unless it can be shown that they received funding or direction from out of state, which would be difficult to prove.

The case shows the incredible power of prosecutors to decide who will be charged, and who will not. The voters have the ultimate authority to place or remove prosecutors. Prosecutors are almost never removed unless their crimes are blatant.

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael D. Graveley may be contacted at (262) 653-2400. Email can be sent through a email wizard at the Kenosha County website.

The Assistant DA who signed the criminal complaint against Kyle Rittenhouse is Angelina Gabriele. Her email is:
[email protected]"

They chased a criminal who had just killed someone and fled the scene.
They should have beat the crap out of him

Bullshit. He was attacked by the rioters, shot two of them dead, and blew the arm off another who had pointed a pistol at him.

Clear case of self-defense...

Watch the video...

Lawyer of alleged Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse claims self-defense as video emerges

Rittenhouse shot a man before these people attacked him he ran from the scene of the first shooting after calling a buddy to tell him he killed someone. ( bragging?).

So it could be said these people were trying to stop him from killing anyone else

First of all, that would be vigilantism. Something the leftards are against.

Second - They all knew who he was. They were engaged with him and his friends at the gas station - all of them.

Third - that makes them acting in the capacity of judge, jury and executioner.

Ritttenhouse was breaking the law so whatever happened to him was ultimately his own fault

False.

That's like saying if someone attacks you while you're jaywalking you can't defend yourself.

Quit embarrassing yourself.

So if a guy breaks into your house and shoots you, you believe he can claim it was self defense?

Whether or not something is self defense under the law is determined by the totality of the circumstances.
Under the circumstances in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, I am seeing a whole lot of evidence that he was acting to protect himself from great bodily harm or death. More than enough to cast a reasonable doubt on any charges against him. And since prosecutors are not in the habit of proceeding with loser cases, you have to wonder why they were so quick to charge this kid, and so hot to fry him.


Shenanigans and fuckery everywhere.

Funny I see a whole lot of evidence that he was breaking WI gun laws.

I've heard conflicting opinions on that.
And it may not matter; I've seen cases where felons were caught in possession of firearms and walked due to some mitigating circumstances.

right and as a law abiding gun owner with a concealed carry permit I think everyone that breaks gun laws should do prison time.

I don't understand how anyone can support anyone who breaks the law.

There are a lot of bullshit laws on the books.

And you don't get to break them without consequences.

I ignore them every single day.


Come and get me.

so you ignore gun laws every single day?

Then you sir are part of the problem not to mention a fucking hypocrite

How so?