Churchill also needlessly lost hundreds of thousands of troops in the failed Gallipoli campaign that he led.I did not claim that. Try reading the post.Ah then you were wrong he did more than partially lead them
you said:
Eisenhower was given that title because the US was employing the Golden Rule...we had the gold, we made the rules. Read the citation deplorable fool. Churchill and Roosevelt went over the plans together for years and went back and forth on them.This means that you said that Churchill partially led allied forces who stormed the beaches of Normandy...
Eisenhower was supreme comander...
I don't know what your point is anyway, and I don't think you do either. Churchill is a towering figure of the 20th century and all the tiny little socialist pygmies who have tried to diminish him for years can't counter his authority and leadership that saved England when they needed it most.
And then the cowards that attacked him turned their backs on him the minute the war ended and Hitler
was sent to Hell. He had great faults but greater still was his spirit that inspired England to rise from it's mediocrity and do one great thing before the socialists that infected that nation like worms finally took over.
And England is still trying to find it's way in the 21st century.