Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But what happened to the models that said by now there would be no more snow!!!
There were no such models. You're just a pathological liar.
And you're proud of that, since it earns you status in your liars' cult.
David Parker, at the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Berkshire, says ultimately, British children could have only virtual experience of snow. Via the internet, they might wonder at polar scenes - or eventually "feel" virtual cold.
Heavy snow will return occasionally, says Dr Viner, but when it does we will be unprepared. "We're really going to get caught out. Snow will probably cause chaos in 20 years time," he said.
The same thing that happened with the ones that said we would be underwater.Yes it is called winter.Again, New England is getting hammered by tons of ice and snow.. while the West is getting hammered in ICE and Snow..
Hmmmm............really?
But what happened to the models that said by now there would be no more snow!!!
duh
So now you're claiming that an offhand comment that doesn't even say what you claimed is a "model that said it would never snow".
Way to lie even bigger, Billy. Thanks for proving my point of so well, about how most deniers tend to be pathologically dishonest because their cult commands it of them.
Whichever denier currently is currently wearing the single testicle that all the deniers here share, could that person perhaps perhaps invoke its testicular fortitude to either find these magical mystery models that supposedly said it would never snow, or at least to admit that Skook and Billy are just making stupid crap up?
Top of the page on DRUDGE right now....................
NOAA 2185 cold records broken or tied in past week 1913 Low Min Records Broken 272 tied in 7 days Climate Depot
Hmmm............but the AGW mental cases tell us its a warm winter!!!!
So now you're claiming that an offhand comment that doesn't even say what you claimed is a "model that said it would never snow".
Way to lie even bigger, Billy. Thanks for proving my point of so well, about how most deniers tend to be pathologically dishonest because their cult commands it of them.
Whichever denier currently is currently wearing the single testicle that all the deniers here share, could that person perhaps perhaps invoke its testicular fortitude to either find these magical mystery models that supposedly said it would never snow, or at least to admit that Skook and Billy are just making stupid crap up?
hahahahahhahaahahahaha that's a good one.
......no fish for him!!!
nope, just very cold.Latest Global Temps
http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/
LOL. +0.30 deg. C, warmer than any month on record prior to 1997. You East coasters got a bit of winter weather are are stupid enough to think that you are the whole world.
just because it's winter is supposed to be cold? Isn't it winter in California, it isn't cold there.Well, it is winter.
Latest Global Temps
Latest Global Temps Roy Spencer PhD.
LOL. +0.30 deg. C, warmer than any month on record prior to 1997. You East coasters got a bit of winter weather are are stupid enough to think that you are the whole world.
)
http://www.drroyspencer.com/my-global-warming-skepticism-for-dummies/
It is important to understand at the outset that those of us who are skeptical of mankind’s influence on climate have a wide variety of views on the subject, and we can’t all be right. In fact, in this business, it is really easy to be wrong. It seems like everyone has a theory of what causes climate change. But it only takes one of us to be right for the IPCC’s anthropogenic global warming (AGW) house of cards to collapse.
As I like to say, taking measurements of the climate system is much easier than figuring out what those measurements mean in terms of cause and effect. Generally speaking, it’s not the warming that is in dispute…it’s the cause of the warming.
If you disagree with my views on something, please don’t flame me. Chances are, I’ve already heard your point of view; very seldom am I provided with new evidence I haven’t already taken into account.
So, you are saying that Dr. Spencer is providing false information. Interesting.
