Lloyd Austin Resignation

[Blaster]

Former military pilots call for Austin's resignation.

Former military pilots demand Austin’s resignation: 'Complete dereliction of duty'

The MACH 1 Caucus – comprised of four former military pilots in Congress – is demanding Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's resignation or dismissal after his delayed hospital treatment notification.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Blaster]

Dereliction of duty.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Jeepers...."former"..meaning.."no longer" pilots....in Congress..Republicans no less.
Sure, I would care what they have to say...NOT!

 

[hadit]

Jeepers...."former"..meaning.."no longer" pilots....in Congress..Republicans no less.
Sure, I would care what they have to say...NOT!

Good, then we won't be hearing from you on this thread anymore.

 

[1srelluc]

Darth Austin has altered the deal, pray he doesn't alter it further..

At least the bands know what to play when he shows-up.

 

[hadit]

Former military pilots call for Austin's resignation.

Former military pilots demand Austin’s resignation: 'Complete dereliction of duty'

The MACH 1 Caucus – comprised of four former military pilots in Congress – is demanding Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's resignation or dismissal after his delayed hospital treatment notification.

www.foxnews.com

Seriously, the Commander in Chief not knowing one of his direct reports is out of commission is not a good thing. I mean, sure, no one really thinks Quid Pro is on top of things, but there's the chain of command to consider.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Good, then we won't be hearing from you on this thread anymore.

So just, so righteous. I can feel the anger and righteousness seeping through your keyboard.

 

[hadit]

So just, so righteous. I can feel the anger and righteousness seeping through your keyboard.

Hey, I thought you didn't care about this. Why are you still here?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Jeepers...."former"..meaning.."no longer" pilots....in Congress.

Exactly, former, because active duty wouldn't be permitted to make a statement like that without facing major disciplinary action, including possible court martial.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hey, I thought you didn't care about this. Why are you still here?

He got his weekly allowance



and thought he'd contribute to the thread,

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Hey, I thought you didn't care about this. Why are you still here?

Because you obviously do. Because you want a political battering ram. Austin will get a dressing down from his commander-in-chief...as he should. And that'll be the end of it. If his CIC wants his resignation, Austin will give it. End of story.
A bunch of former pilots now congressional fat asses mouthing off....are irrelevant. Especially since if this happened in a Republican administration...they'd be saying..<insert crickets chirping here>.

 

[hadit]

Because you obviously do. Because you want a political battering ram. Austin will get a dressing down from his commander-in-chief...as he should. And that'll be the end of it. If his CIC wants his resignation, Austin will give it. End of story.
A bunch of former pilots now congressional fat asses mouthing off....are irrelevant. Especially since if this happened in a Republican administration...they'd be saying..<insert crickets chirping here>.

And clearly you care, because you're still opining here. Good, now that we've established that your original stance was false, we can go ahead and discuss what happened. Of course, you might have to get rid of "if the other guys" to maintain credibility, but I'm sure we can do that. I maintain it is a problem for the Commander in Chief to not know one of his direct reports was out of commission. I also maintain that no one was really concerned because Quid Pro isn't, shall we say, the most present Commander in Chief we've ever had.

 

[Donald H]

It's a positive sign coming from the R's that they dislike him enough to go to the trouble a few month before the inevitable.

Or maybe they have nothing else to do, now that the war against Russia has turned sour.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

And clearly you care, because you're still opining here. Good, now that we've established that your original stance was false, we can go ahead and discuss what happened. Of course, you might have to get rid of "if the other guys" to maintain credibility, but I'm sure we can do that. I maintain it is a problem for the Commander in Chief to not know one of his direct reports was out of commission. I also maintain that no one was really concerned because Quid Pro isn't, shall we say, the most present Commander in Chief we've ever had.

You're entire argument here is a biased, political one. Your use of little 5th grade, cutesy names tells me all your looking for here is to land a political blow. I understand. Not much is sticking on your side of the aisle lately.

"My original stance" was that four ******* blowhards in Congress don't have jack to say about what Austin should do. His CIC does. Over..and out!

 

[Mac-7]

You're entire argument here is a biased, political one. Your use of little 5th grade, cutesy names tells me all your looking for here is to land a political blow. I understand. Not much is sticking on your side of the aisle lately.

"My original stance" was that four ******* blowhards in Congress don't have jack to say about what Austin should do. His CIC does. Over..and out!

Trench warfare is never fun, is it?

We have been putting up with lib haters for years attacking every small detail about Trump

Being under constant attack wears on you.

But your side made the rules and you’ll just have to live with it

 

[odanny]

Exactly, former, because active duty wouldn't be permitted to make a statement like that without facing major disciplinary action, including possible court Marshall.

Court martial.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Trench warfare is never fun, is it?

We have been putting up with lib haters for years attacking every small detail about Trump

Being under constant attack wears on you.

But your side made the rules and you’ll just have to live with it

I'm not sure what rules you're talking about in this case.
If this were the previous administration, those four "pilots" would be saying....nothing.

 

[Mac-7]

I'm not sure what rules you're talking about in this case.
If this were the previous administration, those four "pilots" would be saying....nothing.

I’m referring to the unwritten rules of political war in a lib banana republic like our country is becoming

 

[hadit]

You're entire argument here is a biased, political one. Your use of little 5th grade, cutesy names tells me all your looking for here is to land a political blow. I understand. Not much is sticking on your side of the aisle lately.

"My original stance" was that four ******* blowhards in Congress don't have jack to say about what Austin should do. His CIC does. Over..and out!

Except that Congress has oversight on some aspects of the executive branch, so yeah, they do have something to say about it, as should every American. Let's see if the White House will actually deal with this problem or if they'll ignore it.

 

[westwall]

I'm not sure what rules you're talking about in this case.
If this were the previous administration, those four "pilots" would be saying....nothing.

Austin went AWOL. Look it up.