Liz Cheney Gives Warning to Supreme Court

[Godboy]

Common fucking sense. What's your excuse?

Common sense? How so?

 

[Curried Goats]

She deleted evidence. She ruined peoples lives. She will have to pay for that.

You keep fantasizing that fail boy. Selling you fantasies is what Trumps all about.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Sure. That sounds like an unbiased account and not some pussy leaking all over the internet....

Just look at you, all grown up and shyte.

 

[skye]

The Cheneys are vile, vile people!

 

[JustAGuy1]

Common fucking sense. What's your excuse?

In other words you got nuthin, got it.

 

[MarathonMike]

He will literally hire the next head of DOJ.

More importantly he will FIRE the heads of the DOJ, FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, the IRS and install Real Americans.

 

[Godboy]

You keep fantasizing that fail boy. Selling you fantasies is what Trumps all about.

Your wishful thinking isnt going to help people like Liz after the election.

 

[BluesLegend]

She is just looking for attention NBC/MSNBC is looking for a token anti Trump Republican for a contributor give them a call Liz.

She miscalculated, threw in with Democrats against Trump and her own state disowned her for it. Now she's desperate for attention. Mitt (loser) Romney ditto.

 

[Curried Goats]

Neither did Trump but he's being indicted and on trial. There's probably more evidence of wrong doing with Cheney. She should be indicted for fraud.

Then give that evidence to a grand jury like the evidence against Trump was and see if you can get some charges.

 

[Godboy]

She miscalculated, threw in with Democrats against Trump and her own state disowned her for it. Now she's desperate for attention. Mitt (loser) Romney ditto.

She will be getting A LOT of attention after Trump is elected. Public trials are very entertaining.

 

[Curried Goats]

apparently eyewitness testimony as little meaning to you

Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony

You posted Loudermilks opinion about Ornatos testimony. What exactly did Ornato testify to and why is it relevant to anything?

 

[tyroneweaver]

You posted Loudermilks opinion about Ornatos testimony. What exactly did Ornato testify to and why is it relevant to anything?

LOL

 

[BluesLegend]

She will be getting A LOT of attention after Trump is elected. Public trials are very entertaining.

Nah, team Trump will be too busy winning to waste time on that washed up loser. There are far more corrupt criminal Dems up the chain to punish!

 

[Foxfyre]

Liz Cheney gives warning to Supreme Court

Cheney warned the justice system cannot be "incapable" of holding Donald Trump accountable before the election in November.

www.newsweek.com

Liz Cheney issued a warning to the United States Supreme Court about its handling of former President Donald Trump's claims of presidential immunity.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments into Trump's immunity claims on April 25. His legal team has argued presidential immunity should shield Trump from being charged in the Department of Justice (DOJ) case surrounding alleged attempts at thwarting the 2020 election results.

The DOJ last year charged the former president with attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, culminating in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, as well as alleged efforts to send false slates of pro-Trump electors to the electoral college from key swing states. He has maintained his innocence, pleading not guilty to all charges.

Trump has argued that he was acting in an official capacity at the time, and therefore cannot be charged. Critics have said he was acting as a candidate, not an elected official.

Cheney, on Wednesday warned the Supreme Court about the importance of handling the case quickly while speaking at Drake University's Annual Bucksbaum Distinguished Lectureship.

Comment:
The DOJ has become a political weapon of the corrupt Democrat Party.
AG Garland is using malicious prosecution of Trump to interfere with the 2024 election. (Malicious prosecution - Wikipedia)
We are not a banana republic...yet.
There was no insurrection or attempted insurrection.
Liz Cheney is still pursuing her crazy insurrection conspiracy.

Liz Cheney's obvious TDS is as bad as some members of this board. And Liz Cheney who should be disbarred for unethical conduct has zero credibility when it comes to 'warning' or 'ordering' or even suggesting that the Supreme Court is obligated to do anything.

If a President acting in his official capacity as President must forever live in fear that some vindictive person or persons will go after him after he is out of office, we are done as a republic. Nobody will take the job ever again who actually will do the job. That is why the Constitution specifies that the sole authority for disciplining an errant President was given ONLY to the people's elected representatives and no other.

 

[Curried Goats]

Your wishful thinking isnt going to help people like Liz after the election.

Help from what? Trumps impotent wrath? Fat fuck couldn't build a wall or Lock her up, why the fuck would I entertain the possibility of Trump being capable of anything other than playing golf poorly?

 

[Leo123]

Sure. That sounds like an unbiased account and not some pussy leaking all over the internet....

Always happy to roll back the frontiers of ignorance.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Liz Cheney's obvious TDS is as bad as some members of this board. And Liz Cheney who should be disbarred for unethical conduct has zero credibility when it comes to 'warning' or 'ordering' or even suggesting that the Supreme Court is obligated to do anything.

If a President acting in his official capacity as President must forever live in fear that some vindictive person or persons will go after him after he is out of office, we are done as a republic. Nobody will take the job ever again who actually will do the job. That is why the Constitution specifies that the sole authority for disciplining an errant President was given ONLY to the people's elected representatives and no other.

It's odd how quickly Dems coalesced around her.

 

[Curried Goats]

Always happy to roll back the frontiers of ignorance.

I'm not the one mistaking bitching online for objective evidence.

 

[Leo123]

Then give that evidence to a grand jury like the evidence against Trump was and see if you can get some charges.

With this Democrat DOJ?

 

[Leo123]

I'm not the one mistaking bitching online for objective evidence.

What objective evidence?