Living Document or Not?

Yurt, go clean the urinals and leave the discussion to the adults, please.
 
Yurt, when you have something worth to discuss, I will notify you. Now shut up.
 
Yurt, go clean the urinals and leave the discussion to the adults, please.

Jokey is such a boring one note symPHONY. He uses that dismissive line on everyone who kicks his stupid ass.

Jokey has absolutely nothing to bring to the table.

Hey Jokey, you pin dick scumbag, we all see it. Well, everyone except your fellow dopey uber lib liars, like TruthSucksToHer. But she's irrelevant too.
 
Yurt, go clean the urinals and leave the discussion to the adults, please.

Yurt, when you have something worth to discuss, I will notify you. Now shut up.

wow....you really showed me there me there...

gosh....i had no idea so many facts were out there to dispute anything i said

wait...let's see jakes "rules" of debate again:

Let's go over the rules of debate. If you make an affirmative claim, you have to support that assertion with facts, analysis, evidence, stats, something other than your claim. You have to do that before anyone has to make a counter argument matching your points and evidence.


odd....haven't seen jake do that once, at least with anything him and i have debated....or anything that he has made an affirmative claim on...

appears am i right...legion troll is alive and well
 
Good night, guys. Try to offer something before I return.
 
you are stating gerneralities and giving no real cases to examine.

Now do you accept the scotus has the right to decide what laws comport with the constitution?

Of course they do. The notion that they actually get it right every time is another matter entirely. You can't deny that some of their decisions do not comport with the constitution. Whatever those decisions may be doesn't magically make what was once unconstitutional suddenly constitutional, anymore than you can make one plus one equal three just by saying so.
 
And that has nothing to to with SCOTUS as the final reviewer of constitutionality. If the states for instance had deprived women or other minorities from voting on a proposed amendment in referendum or for legislators in assembly, SCOTUS would rule on the unconstitutionality of that.

picking and choosing read it again

You are deliberately being immorally obtuse. The point is very clear, and you are very wrong. No one here has said SCOTUS could change the Constitution. What SCOTUS does is to interpret the Constitution. End of argument.

WOW jakeass said I was being immorally obtuse. You are flat out disregarding what is being implied by truth and you are being just plain obtuse.
 
This is a red herring, bigreb. Look it up if you don't understand. SCOTUS does not matter in this case, because the 13th Amendment was a congressional matter. If SCOTUS had ruled on the matter, it would have ruled that congress had acted within the Constitution.

Let me explain something to you jakeass you do not need to define anything to me. So tell me has the tenth amendmnt been repealed?

Your point has been answered and your argument dismissed. It does not pertain. Neither does your interpretation of the 10th Amendment. Only SCOTUS can define that. Guess what?

Has the tenth amendment been repealed and if you answer any other way you are being "immorally obtuse" Yes if it has and no if it hasn't
 
Nicely put.

Yurt has competently described what he and you do. He is following Rush's Rules for Fools: accuse the other side of what you do.

When you post evidence, I evaluate it and I let you know if it is good.

odd....i'm still waiting for your evidence i'm a racist and i don't support judicial review....

two bit hack

He's claiming in another thread that I am a racist because I used the word ******

The converstaion went something like this
jakeass said I wasn't a conservative but a recationary, which that pisses me off when someone calls someone something when they don't even know the person. I told jakeass to call me anything else but a conservative you might as well be calling me a ******. So now I'm a racist. I guess all those blacks who go around using that word at a drop of a of hat are also racist.
 
if our constitution is so precious, how come it doesn't seem to be working out for anyone?
 
Yes, do scamper off, Jake the Fake. :lol:

Hell, I'll debate your ass any day of the week...Let's pick a topic!

I gave you two to pick from last month and you ran away. So you pick out several.
 
15th post
jakeass said I wasn't a conservative but a recationary, which that pisses me off when someone calls someone something when they don't even know the person. I told jakeass to call me anything else but a conservative you might as well be calling me a ******. So now I'm a racist. I guess all those blacks who go around using that word at a drop of a of hat are also racist.

You call people names all the time, so get off your rocking horse, crybaby.

Check my signature line to see what you wrote. Anyone who uses the n-word is a racist. You don't get to define what racism is. You get your own opinion but you don't have your own reality and your own definitions. Get over yourself, son.

And, yes, everything you write points out that you (like Dude, Yurt, Liability, etc) are not conservatives but far right wacky reactionaries hiding behind the conservative title. You are not conservative.
 
jakeass said I wasn't a conservative but a recationary, which that pisses me off when someone calls someone something when they don't even know the person. I told jakeass to call me anything else but a conservative you might as well be calling me a ******. So now I'm a racist. I guess all those blacks who go around using that word at a drop of a of hat are also racist.

You call people names all the time, so get off your rocking horse, crybaby.

Check my signature line to see what you wrote. Anyone who uses the n-word is a racist. You don't get to define what racism is. You get your own opinion but you don't have your own reality and your own definitions. Get over yourself, son.

And, yes, everything you write points out that you (like Dude, Yurt, Liability, etc) are not conservatives but far right wacky reactionaries hiding behind the conservative title. You are not conservative.

Idiot uber lib liars like Jokey do not get to tell anybody else what their political ideology is. Jokey, being nothing but a lying piece of shit troll and a coward, cannot even be bothered to honestly identify where he stands on the political spectrum.

He claims to be a "Republican!" :lol::lol::lol::lol: :rofl:

Jokey, pin-dick fly ****** that he is, does not care for my political ideology. Thus, being nothing but a ******* lowlife liar, he proceeds to apply a deliberately false label. It's Jokey's way: all dishonesty all the time.

Jokey couldn't differentiate a conservative from a so-called "reactionary" (a label he applies without a clue of what it actually means) since he doesn't understand anything involved in political ideology. He randomly applies labels because he is really quite stupid.
 
Shut up, Liability. You are not a real true--blue Republican, you reactionary skank.
 
jakeass said I wasn't a conservative but a recationary, which that pisses me off when someone calls someone something when they don't even know the person. I told jakeass to call me anything else but a conservative you might as well be calling me a ******. So now I'm a racist. I guess all those blacks who go around using that word at a drop of a of hat are also racist.

You call people names all the time, so get off your rocking horse, crybaby.

Check my signature line to see what you wrote. Anyone who uses the n-word is a racist. You don't get to define what racism is. You get your own opinion but you don't have your own reality and your own definitions. Get over yourself, son.

And, yes, everything you write points out that you (like Dude, Yurt, Liability, etc) are not conservatives but far right wacky reactionaries hiding behind the conservative title. You are not conservative.

So, you acknowledge that a high percentage of black people are in fact racists?
 
Back
Top Bottom