tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
First up was the troops in Washington.
full of what if statements. What if a person stands to close, what if she bumps into one and gets arrested for assault
then they went into mind reading. What if the soldier has a predisposition to find reasons to arrest a person.
of course no one brought up, what if the NG likes to sit on his fat ass and eat donuts and do nothing
Sounded like a laundry list of what was done to J6 protesters
www.whqr.org
Despite protests and legal challenges, Trump has repeatedly touted extending federal control over the nation's capital, even though data shared by the Justice Department shows violent crime in the city hit a 30-year low last year. LOL
Next up, Wolves in Montana and Colorado
www.ypradio.org
I already knew where this one was going.
Shooting wolves has no depreasionable affect on attack on livestock. You would have to shoot 14 wolves to save one cow.
Did their study say what was the main source of food for a wolf is? which 'is" hoofed animals
Government hates any relationship that could be developed between a father and son deer/elk hunting
full of what if statements. What if a person stands to close, what if she bumps into one and gets arrested for assault
then they went into mind reading. What if the soldier has a predisposition to find reasons to arrest a person.
of course no one brought up, what if the NG likes to sit on his fat ass and eat donuts and do nothing
Sounded like a laundry list of what was done to J6 protesters
Former National Guard vice chief calls deployment to D.C. an 'intimidation' tactic
Former National Guard Vice Chief Major General Randy E. Manner says deploying the Guard to D.C. will ruin how the average American views the military.
Despite protests and legal challenges, Trump has repeatedly touted extending federal control over the nation's capital, even though data shared by the Justice Department shows violent crime in the city hit a 30-year low last year. LOL
Next up, Wolves in Montana and Colorado
New study raises questions about effectiveness of wolf hunting as a tool to help ranchers
One of the goals of controversial wolf hunts in the Western U.S. is to help reduce the burden on ranchers, who lose livestock to wolves every year. A new study finds that those hunts have had a measurable, but small effect on livestock depredations.
I already knew where this one was going.
Shooting wolves has no depreasionable affect on attack on livestock. You would have to shoot 14 wolves to save one cow.
Did their study say what was the main source of food for a wolf is? which 'is" hoofed animals
Government hates any relationship that could be developed between a father and son deer/elk hunting