RightThinking
Member
Excellent!
The central characteristic of today's Liberalism is the proclivity to defer virtually every issue of importance to the central authority.
List of top 20 things destroying America
- Thread starter TheOldSchool
- Start date
The central characteristic of today's Liberalism is the proclivity to defer virtually every issue of importance to the central authority.
Moonglow
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #102
This is stemming off of another thread. I want to ask all of you... what are the top 20 obstacles facing this country right now?
I'm posting this to hopefully prove a point to someone else on this site but I'm sure it will go terribly wrong
I'll start:
The deficit
threat of terrorism
rise of China
weakening of europe
partisanship between Democrats and Republicans
the state of the media
Carry on.
And don't just say "Obama" you can do better than that.
1. Tea baggers
2. Libertarians
3. Republicans
4. Conservatives
5. Fundamentalist Christians
6. American Idol
7. Hurricanes
8. Tornadoes
9. The University of Alabama varsity football team
10. Cicadas
11. Tea baggers
12. Libertarians
13. Republicans
14. Conservatives
15. Fundamentalist Christians
16. Tea baggers
17. Libertarians
18. Republicans
19. Conservatives
20. Talk Radio
Damn I only had two and you said I was whining!
Although I have to agree with your assessment of University of Alabama varsity football team and Nick Saban
Well, we can't have them winning every season.
Roadrunner
Roadrunner
14th Amendment
It seems that political correctness got Obama elected.
His resume sure didn't warrant the presidency.
This is stemming off of another thread. I want to ask all of you... what are the top 20 obstacles facing this country right now?
I'm posting this to hopefully prove a point to someone else on this site but I'm sure it will go terribly wrong
I'll start:
The deficit
threat of terrorism
rise of China
weakening of europe
partisanship between Democrats and Republicans
the state of the media
Carry on.
And don't just say "Obama" you can do better than that.
1. Tea baggers
2. Libertarians
3. Republicans
4. Conservatives
5. Fundamentalist Christians
6. American Idol
7. Hurricanes
8. Tornadoes
9. The University of Alabama varsity football team
10. Cicadas
11. Tea baggers
12. Libertarians
13. Republicans
14. Conservatives
15. Fundamentalist Christians
16. Tea baggers
17. Libertarians
18. Republicans
19. Conservatives
20. Talk Radio
Damn I only had two and you said I was whining!
Although I have to agree with your assessment of University of Alabama varsity football team and Nick Saban
I might have to replace
"University of Alabama varsity football team and Nick Saban" (who?)
with
"anybody who gives the foggiest shit about the University of Alabama varsity football team and Nick Saban".
It seems that political correctness got Obama elected.
His resume sure didn't warrant the presidency.
It was longer that his predecessor's, but no his resume didn't. The elections did that.
>> Suppose you had to choose between two Presidential candidates, one of whom had spent 20 years in Congress plus had considerable other relevant experience and the other of whom had about half a dozen years in the Illinois state legislature and 2 years in Congress. Which one do you think would make a better President? If you chose #1, congratulations, you picked James Buchanan over Abraham Lincoln. << -- the myth of presidential "experience"
Besides that, the factor always left out of that myth: who he was running against and how much they represented the status quo, and the fact that the economy had just collapsed. In that environment you could have run a turtle and won the election.
Last edited:
CrazedScotsman
VIP Member
- Jul 1, 2012
- 980
- 264
- 80
It all comes down to one thing. You don't need a list of 20 things that is wrong with this country, or whatever it is you want, there's only one problem.
The majority of the people in this country just don't care and that's it.
The majority of the people in this country just don't care and that's it.
Spoonman
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2010
- 18,163
- 7,663
- 330
Totally agree. the world is a very different place then it was 50 years ago. and steadily we have been in a moral decline. we have even gotten to the point where corruption is accepted as well, that's just how it is done. we have made tollerable what we used to consider intollerable. also, i think meida sensationalism has made shock and awe become common place.
noose4
Senior Member
Talk radio/Fox news sheep
Trickle down economics
corporatism
de-regulation of the financial sector
Trickle down economics
corporatism
de-regulation of the financial sector
Mac1958
Diamond Member
Spoonman
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2010
- 18,163
- 7,663
- 330
ok, after reading through everything I'll try not to repeat any.
Lack of respect for others.
Need to refocus on America First. Lets fix us first before we try to get in others business
as we have become more diverse we have lost our sense of being American. We have lost our sense of National community.
Lack of respect for others.
Need to refocus on America First. Lets fix us first before we try to get in others business
as we have become more diverse we have lost our sense of being American. We have lost our sense of National community.
It seems that political correctness got Obama elected.
His resume sure didn't warrant the presidency.
It was longer that his predecessor's, but no his resume didn't. The elections did that.
>> Suppose you had to choose between two Presidential candidates, one of whom had spent 20 years in Congress plus had considerable other relevant experience and the other of whom had about half a dozen years in the Illinois state legislature and 2 years in Congress. Which one do you think would make a better President? If you chose #1, congratulations, you picked James Buchanan over Abraham Lincoln. << -- the myth of presidential "experience"
Besides that, the factor always left out of that myth: who he was running against and how much they represented the status quo, and the fact that the economy had just collapsed. In that environment you could have run a turtle and won the election.
Obama's voting record in Illinois was weak....voting "present". His two years in Congress was more campaigning than anything. I suggest that Lincoln's credentials were better than Obama's.
I can remember during his first campaign being called articulate and clean. I can remember them saying that it's time to have a Black man lead this nation.
The top two choices were a Black man and a woman, neither were the best qualified to run this nation, but they both were politically correct.
Yes, a turtle could have beaten any republican in 2008. But, the dems could have brought a better candidate to the election.
The number one thing killing this country is the number of people in the ship that are being paid to sit on their butt and do nothing but vote to maintain their flow of federal redistribution checks. The ship has become so heavy with their largesse that it has stopped moving forward economically. To the contrary the folks that are working have had to stop rowing and are now bailing water due to all of the holes that the rats have sprung. America is the titanic socialism was our ice flow. The band is still playing... but the end is nigh.
Last edited:
You don't get it. I don't want you to fix me or my family. I want you to leave me alone. I want the feds to stay away from my paycheck. I want the feds to stay out of my communications. I want the feds for the most part to be fired.
It seems that political correctness got Obama elected.
His resume sure didn't warrant the presidency.
It was longer that his predecessor's, but no his resume didn't. The elections did that.
>> Suppose you had to choose between two Presidential candidates, one of whom had spent 20 years in Congress plus had considerable other relevant experience and the other of whom had about half a dozen years in the Illinois state legislature and 2 years in Congress. Which one do you think would make a better President? If you chose #1, congratulations, you picked James Buchanan over Abraham Lincoln. << -- the myth of presidential "experience"
Besides that, the factor always left out of that myth: who he was running against and how much they represented the status quo, and the fact that the economy had just collapsed. In that environment you could have run a turtle and won the election.
Obama's voting record in Illinois was weak....voting "present". His two years in Congress was more campaigning than anything. I suggest that Lincoln's credentials were better than Obama's.
I can remember during his first campaign being called articulate and clean. I can remember them saying that it's time to have a Black man lead this nation.
The top two choices were a Black man and a woman, neither were the best qualified to run this nation, but they both were politically correct.
Yes, a turtle could have beaten any republican in 2008. But, the dems could have brought a better candidate to the election.
That's certainly true. But it's been true of both parties for about as long as I can remember.
And again, the electorate votes in the primaries...
This is stemming off of another thread. I want to ask all of you... what are the top 20 obstacles facing this country right now?
I'm posting this to hopefully prove a point to someone else on this site but I'm sure it will go terribly wrong
I'll start:
The deficit
threat of terrorism
rise of China
weakening of europe
partisanship between Democrats and Republicans
the state of the media
Carry on.
And don't just say "Obama" you can do better than that.
America is getting better and will continue to do so.
Anyone who bets against America will lose.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Crime in DC has plummetted since Jan 2025, murder down 68%.- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 0
-
-
sound, water bubbles, and flash of light- Started by trevorjohnson83
- Replies: 1
-
Is the Strait of Hurmuz a sliver lining for Climate Change?- Started by Raynine
- Replies: 3
