Nothing for Snowden or Assange.
Those guys are fuckers who got in trouble with their own party. Barack Obama already commuted Chelsea Manning's sentence.
Formerly known as “Bradley” -- “she,” I mean, come on, 5'2'' in the men's barracks in the Army -- there's all this camaraderie and all different body shapes and sizes and fat acceptance in whatever department of the Army that is.
If Julian Assange wasn't physically present in the United States at the particular time to be accused of whatever crime he allegedly committed in the U.S. under U.S. law, what good would it do for Trump to pardon him? If the courts aren't going to follow the due process of law -- -- which they don't anyways since they arbitrarily cut off our gun rights in flagrant violation of the Constitution, a U.S. pardon isn't going to let him off the hook in some foreign country anyways.
We already have a Sixth Amendment for Snowden and Assange.
>>> The 6th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
>>> In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.<<<
A “shelf indictment” to be “unsealed” at some arbitrary future time of foreign travel does not qualify as a speedy trial under the U.S. Constitution. If the D.O.J. declinced to press charges at the time, or lost to Snowden at an extradition hearing in Russia, or declined to pursue extradition, then he must be free of all charges according to the U.S. Constitution.
The D.O.J. doesn't have a state or district previously ascertained by law in which to try Julian Assange for his alleged crimes either.
What more is Donald Trump supposed to offer, on his personal initiative as President, when the courts refuse to respect the due process which is already laid down in the Constitution as the supreme law of the land?
A Presidential pardon should not ever be necessary except in extraordinary cases of a miserably failed and unutterably corrupt justice system.