List of fakes of German history

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,622
138
This is not a complete list, only self-evident fakes.

It is believed that Germany opposed Rome, but in fact Magna Germany was a province of Rome, this is confused with Western Sarmatia (see Ptolemy's maps)

It is believed that immediately after the fall of Rome, the Franks conquered Europe, but in fact this did not happen earlier than the beginning of the Gothic period in art, around the 13-14 centuries, before that the power in Europe belonged to the Hunnic knights.

It is believed that after the Congress of Vienna a German confederation emerged, but in fact, Napoleon fought with Austro-Hungary and the satellites, and after his defeat the Austro-Hungarian Habsburgs established power in Europe. Germany began to dominate only towards the end of the 19th century, and it was not the Germans, but the Prussians, who organized the "small path of unification"

Modern historians are busy with obvious uncomplicated forgeris, substituting facts, for the sake of the left
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Here is the real story of the emergence of Germany.

In 16-13 BC, 2 provinces were created on the territory of Belgian Gaul: Upper and Lower Germany, they were subordinate to the procurator of Belgium. Later they were transformed into different regions.

As far as I understood, the province with the name Germany Magna never existed at all, these were only the plans of Tiberius Augustus.

That is, even Germany Magna as a province of Rome is a historical fake.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
In addition, the words "Germanic nation" were added to the name of the Holy Roman Empire much later than its creation. From 1512
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
I think that the name "Holy Roman Empire" is connected not with Rome, but with Romania, this is the result of the Great Hungarian Conquests
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Just the Roman Empire arose after the Great Hungarian conquests of Europe. The Battle of the Lech River actually ended German expansion and became the starting point for the creation of the Roman Empire.
It is no coincidence that there is confusion with the dating of the Battle, and 2 battles overlap there, one of them is fake. The Hungarians won there.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
400px-Kalandozasok.jpg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
And they invented the Vikings precisely in order to hide it, which is why no one can find traces of their military culture, except for the weapons of lower-rank Roman mercenaries.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Perhaps this is due to the attempted genocide of the Roma-gypsies
 
Most likely what was called the Eastern Roman Empire was precisely this state, from which modern Romania remained in the language
 
1346-1353, the Plague swept across Europe, and in 1512 the Great Roman Empire was renamed the Empire of the German Nation. Is this a coincidence? Who knows.

Everything converges here, 150 years would be just enough to build a new order from the ruins and exterminate the remnants of resistance. Considering that then the technical capabilities were more modest
 
It is no coincidence that the officials generally try not to touch on the history of those periods. About the "dark ages" of Romanesque they generally lie that there is nothing left of them, but they also try not to remember the "bright ages" of the Inquisition and terror.
 

Forum List

Back
Top