Lindsey Graham promises 'full scale' probe into Democrats' handling of Ford-Kavanaugh allegation

[OldLady]

That would be fine with me; I'm dying to know who leaked that letter. I do really wish, though, that the Senate would get off this investigate the investigators kick. It seems they call for investigations at least once a week these days. Can someone please remind them that they are there to create and vote on laws, not go running around like Keystone Cops trying to bust each other?

as much as i would like to know, we're a country of pointless investigations anymore. then we keep at them til we get OUR way, rejecting any outcome we don't want. both sides are horrible at this.

Well, the FBI isn't bad at it, and they are the ones I understand are looking into it now. Am I wrong?

depends on which version of the FBI we're talking about. these days we've divided them up also for our own political gain. like i said, i think all sides have been bad about this and *we the people* need to recognize it and stop being "my way or the highway" in so much of what we do.

What are you talking about, "we" have divided the FBI up? The FBI isn't divided; that is a conspiracy theory created solely to discredit their investigation into Trump's doings.

I was asking a simple question and an answer would be appreciated; apparently you don't know.

then next up you ask me a question and tell me i don't know the answer.

good. i won't bother explaining then since it would be about as pointless as tits on a nun.

What was your answer to whether the FBI is investigating who leaked the letter?

 

[ptbw forever]

not necessarily.

If he keeps nominating Conservatives, and the dems hold them up for 2 years...

who does that make look bad?

Trump for not being serious and willing to work with dems.

President gets his choice, senate can only advise and consent.

Or hold up the nomination until Trump leaves office

Nominating a moderate, not unlike Kennedy,
would go a long way toward ensuring there is no delay in confirmation.

He is a moderate, idiot.

He literally clerked for Kennedy.

Derp.....obviously we aren't talking about Kavanaugh, dope.

Derp....obviously you aren't talking about anyone but a left wing lunatic like Ginsberg.

 

[iceberg]

as much as i would like to know, we're a country of pointless investigations anymore. then we keep at them til we get OUR way, rejecting any outcome we don't want. both sides are horrible at this.

Well, the FBI isn't bad at it, and they are the ones I understand are looking into it now. Am I wrong?

depends on which version of the FBI we're talking about. these days we've divided them up also for our own political gain. like i said, i think all sides have been bad about this and *we the people* need to recognize it and stop being "my way or the highway" in so much of what we do.

What are you talking about, "we" have divided the FBI up? The FBI isn't divided; that is a conspiracy theory created solely to discredit their investigation into Trump's doings.

I was asking a simple question and an answer would be appreciated; apparently you don't know.

then next up you ask me a question and tell me i don't know the answer.

good. i won't bother explaining then since it would be about as pointless as tits on a nun.

What was your answer to whether the FBI is investigating who leaked the letter?

at this point what difference does it make? you don't ask me questions to get my answers, you ask me questions to tell me i'm wrong with the answers you give me.

 

[OldLady]

Well, the FBI isn't bad at it, and they are the ones I understand are looking into it now. Am I wrong?

depends on which version of the FBI we're talking about. these days we've divided them up also for our own political gain. like i said, i think all sides have been bad about this and *we the people* need to recognize it and stop being "my way or the highway" in so much of what we do.

What are you talking about, "we" have divided the FBI up? The FBI isn't divided; that is a conspiracy theory created solely to discredit their investigation into Trump's doings.

I was asking a simple question and an answer would be appreciated; apparently you don't know.

then next up you ask me a question and tell me i don't know the answer.

good. i won't bother explaining then since it would be about as pointless as tits on a nun.

What was your answer to whether the FBI is investigating who leaked the letter?

at this point what difference does it make? you don't ask me questions to get my answers, you ask me questions to tell me i'm wrong with the answers you give me.

I really wanted to know, but apparently no one does.

 

[DrLove]

Btw - Don't think you answered my question .. should we get big dark money out of politics and repeal Cit United or what?

You thought Hillary was a better choice than Trump.....

But you want me to take my time to school you now?

Sorry - I've never been even slightly interested in getting home-skooled by a Trumptard

 

[Polishprince]

I for one would not quietly sit back and allow them to do that, but my state has no Democratic senators, so I don't really have anyone to ***** at if the Dems try blocking an SC nominee for over two years.

One thing I can tell you for sure is that the Dems have no intentions of holding the vacancy for two years. If there is a Dem majority in the Senate, Trump will have to nominate a more centrist judge to fill the vacancy.

not necessarily.

If he keeps nominating Conservatives, and the dems hold them up for 2 years...

who does that make look bad?

Trump for not being serious and willing to work with dems.

President gets his choice, senate can only advise and consent.

Or hold up the nomination until Trump leaves office

Nominating a moderate, not unlike Kennedy,
would go a long way toward ensuring there is no delay in confirmation.

Obama never nominated a moderate. Neither did Clinton

 

[Auld Phart]

home-skooled by a Trumptard

Why not?

maybe they can teach you to spell 'school'

 

[easyt65]

Agree. I suppose it gives the illusion that they are busy while they are actively refusing to do any work.
What is happening with replace Obamacare? With comprehensive immigration reform including a solution to the DACA dilemma? With infrastructure solutions?
There's work to be done, folks. Is it occurring or will they wait until two weeks before the budget runs out -- again -- to begin thinking about it?

Nice attempt to slip in false accusations / jabs against the GOP, attempts to blame the GOP for the democrats' major F*-UP!

The ACA? There would be no ACA to have to deal with Obama had not lied his ass of to the American people before he and his Democrats rammed their MINORITY-SUPPORTED piece of SOCIALIST AGENDA LEGISLATION down the throats of the MAJORITY of Americans who OPPOSED the ACA and into law.

Blaming the GOP for not fixing Obama and the Democrats' F*-UP is like the captain of the Exon Valdez oil tanker blaming the clean up crew for accident / oil spill!


'DACA'? There is no DACA and thus there is no 'dilemma'.

Obama declared openly he could not do anything to affect US Immigration Law, that it was Un-Constitutional...right before he did it anyway!

Trump stepped in and APPROPRIATELY and wiped Obama's criminal, Un-Constitutional EDICT ('Law') off the books, FORCING CONGRESS TO DO ITS JOB AS THE CONSITUTION REQUIRES.

Democrats had the chance to solve DACA - the GOP offered it to them on a silver platter....AND SCHUMER AND THE DEMOCRATS REJECTED IT...WALKED!

They proved they would rather have an UNRESOLVED ISSUE they could use to try to manipulate voters to the polls with ... except the Latinos were paying attention, saw what they did, and gave the Democrats the proverbial finger as they started to walk away from the party!


ACA - Democrats

DACA - Democrats

Terrorist-Connected Pakistani Spies - Democrats (DWS)

20 Years of Chinese Espionage - Democrats (Feinstein)

China/Russia/+4 Espionage/TS Data Stolen - Democrats (Hillary)

Illegal Spying on Citizens - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Illegal Spying on reporters - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Illegal Spying on the media - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Illegal Spying on US Senators - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Illegal Spying on the USSC - - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Helping Al Qaeda take over Libya - Democrats (Obama)

War Crime/Invading Syria - Democrats (Obama)

2 Un-Constitutional Wars - Democrats (Obama/Brennan)

Sexual Misconduct / Senate Committee using tax dollars to buy their victims' silence - Senate Democrats

2 years of BS Investigations based on zero evidence - still zero evidence - Democrats / Obama

Now ANOTHER BS witch hunt / attempt to destroy a man's entire life to regain power based on ZERO evidence - Democrats

..and this does not even begin to cover it all, not by a longshot!

Americans are PI$$ED...which is why the Democrats lost the WH, why they lost the House, which is why they lost the Senate.....

Yet idiots continue to blame the GOP for what the Democrats have F*ed Up because the Democrats keep manipulating snowflakes by accusing others of what THEY do / have done and accusing others of being who HEY have proven to be.

 

[Lewdog]

Graham is only saying that until he gets the AG position... then it will all be forgotten.

Graham one minute talked about how horrible Trump was, then was his golfing buddy... then against Trump again... and now they might as well be building blanket and pillow forts in the White House. Graham has shown quite clearly he is only willing to do whatever it takes for him to have political survival.

 

[ColonelAngus]

depends on which version of the FBI we're talking about. these days we've divided them up also for our own political gain. like i said, i think all sides have been bad about this and *we the people* need to recognize it and stop being "my way or the highway" in so much of what we do.

What are you talking about, "we" have divided the FBI up? The FBI isn't divided; that is a conspiracy theory created solely to discredit their investigation into Trump's doings.

I was asking a simple question and an answer would be appreciated; apparently you don't know.

then next up you ask me a question and tell me i don't know the answer.

good. i won't bother explaining then since it would be about as pointless as tits on a nun.

What was your answer to whether the FBI is investigating who leaked the letter?

at this point what difference does it make? you don't ask me questions to get my answers, you ask me questions to tell me i'm wrong with the answers you give me.

I really wanted to know, but apparently no one does.

Specifically, why do you think Kavanugh is not qualified for SCOTUS?

 

[Ame®icano]

Republicans honored Obama's win by voting to Confirm Sotomayor and Kaegan.

The Democrat PiecesOS do not just want to NOT honor Trump's win, they want to destroy every aspect of a good man-s life.

Every Democrat involved in this should be ashamed of themselves and should be stripped of their position in the US Senate and sent home.

Dummy, that may have some thing to do with the fact that Sotomayor, Kaegan and Goresuch were not credibly accused by anyone of an assault.

Neither is Kavanaugh.

Um, yes he is.

'Credibly'?


View attachment 219620

WTF is wrong with you snowflakes?


ZERO evidence to support any accusation of a crime involving Kavanaugh...the same thing you retards pulled with the President

Ford can NOT remember WHERE the incident happened
Ford can NOT remember WHEN, not even the YEAR
She has no witnesses
The 4 witnesses she did name all say IT NEVER HAPPENED
She can NOT remember how she got there / how she got home
She admits to being intoxicated
She can NOT remember taking the polygraph, how long it took
She lied about her 'fear of flying'

She said when she told the Washington Post her story she 'corrected' her therapist's notes, claiming THEY got the story wrong

The expert Sex Crimes prosecutor stated there is no way she would take the case to court

ZERO EVIDENCE....

so how the hell do you retards keep claiming she was 'credible'?

EVIDENCE makes someone / a claim 'credible'. She had none, she couldn't remember shit, and she lied....

You have to trust her because "she's a woman".

If that is the only argument in favor of trust, I say that's the main reason not to trust her.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lefties, I am stil ltrying to figure out why you don't want Kavanaugh on the court, sepcifically.

Skip the bullshit about this HS crap, because you were against him before these allegations. Why?

 

[Ame®icano]

Republicans honored Obama's win by voting to Confirm Sotomayor and Kaegan.

The Democrat PiecesOS do not just want to NOT honor Trump's win, they want to destroy every aspect of a good man-s life.

Every Democrat involved in this should be ashamed of themselves and should be stripped of their position in the US Senate and sent home.

Dummy, that may have some thing to do with the fact that Sotomayor, Kaegan and Goresuch were not credibly accused by anyone of an assault.

Neither is Kavanaugh.

Um, yes he is.

'Credibly'?


View attachment 219620

WTF is wrong with you snowflakes?


ZERO evidence to support any accusation of a crime involving Kavanaugh...the same thing you retards pulled with the President

Ford can NOT remember WHERE the incident happened
Ford can NOT remember WHEN, not even the YEAR
She has no witnesses
The 4 witnesses she did name all say IT NEVER HAPPENED
She can NOT remember how she got there / how she got home
She admits to being intoxicated
She can NOT remember taking the polygraph, how long it took
She lied about her 'fear of flying'

She said when she told the Washington Post her story she 'corrected' her therapist's notes, claiming THEY got the story wrong

The expert Sex Crimes prosecutor stated there is no way she would take the case to court

ZERO EVIDENCE....

so how the hell do you retards keep claiming she was 'credible'?

EVIDENCE makes someone / a claim 'credible'. She had none, she couldn't remember shit, and she lied....

Check out this snowflake:
Trump calls Kavanaugh accuser a 'credible' witness
....whooops.

First, the term "snowflake" in past two years is exclusive to leftist losers in their meltdown mode over Hillary losing the elections.

Now that we determined who is who, don't tell me that you suddenly agree with Trump!

Why do you think Trump said she's credible? If she really is, he should've pull back Kavanaugh nomination, but he's not doing it, right?

 

[easyt65]

First, the term "snowflake" in past two years is exclusive to leftist losers in their meltdown mode over Hillary losing the elections.

Now that we determined who is who, don't tell me that you suddenly agree with Trump!

Why do you think Trump said she's credible? If she really is, he should pull back Kavanaugh nomination, but he's not doing it, right?

Bwuhahahaha......

Snowflakes cheer for and praise anyone who attacks the GOP / Trump and boo whoever criticizes Democrats. Case in point - COMEY:

Snowflakes hated Comey when he was investigating Hillary and pointed out she broke the law.

Snowflakes LOVED Comey when he said No indictment anyway

Snowflakes hated Comey when he re-opened the investigation when they found a copy of every TOP SECRET document and e-mail had been illegally downloaded by Hillary's aide onto hger personal laptop at home she shared with her felon pedophile sexting husband

They loved Comey when he lied days later when he closed the investigation again by declaring what Huma had illegally done was not a crime

 

[easyt65]

Specifically, why do you think Kavanugh is not qualified for SCOTUS?

D-Hirono already gave that answer for all Democrats, Liberals, and snowflakes:

'Kavanaugh's decision-making can not be trusted based on the fact that he actually values human life, believes that a completely defenseless living person - who can survive outside the womb but who is still inside the womb - deserves the same right to live and other rights afforded to them by the Constitution and should be protected from murder for any other reason than the mother's life is in jeopardy, & because he believes abortions are not 'post-sex contraceptives'.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump for not being serious and willing to work with dems.

President gets his choice, senate can only advise and consent.

Or hold up the nomination until Trump leaves office

Nominating a moderate, not unlike Kennedy,
would go a long way toward ensuring there is no delay in confirmation.

He is a moderate, idiot.

He literally clerked for Kennedy.

Derp.....obviously we aren't talking about Kavanaugh, dope.

Derp....obviously you aren't talking about anyone but a left wing lunatic like Ginsberg.

Obviously I did not say that at all, loser.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

One thing I can tell you for sure is that the Dems have no intentions of holding the vacancy for two years. If there is a Dem majority in the Senate, Trump will have to nominate a more centrist judge to fill the vacancy.

not necessarily.

If he keeps nominating Conservatives, and the dems hold them up for 2 years...

who does that make look bad?

Trump for not being serious and willing to work with dems.

President gets his choice, senate can only advise and consent.

Or hold up the nomination until Trump leaves office

Nominating a moderate, not unlike Kennedy,
would go a long way toward ensuring there is no delay in confirmation.

Obama never nominated a moderate. Neither did Clinton

Sure.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Can anyone from the left explain why Kavanaugh isn't qualified for SCOTUS?

 

[Dragonlady]

This is a reasonable assessment.

People like Dr. Love convicted and wanted execution of Kavanaugh from the moment Dr.Ford made the accusation.

I don't personally like Kavanaugh, but I dislike the evil Dem tactics even more.

There are so many reasons NOT to put Kavenaugh on the SC court that it's getting to be too many to mention.

1. Let's start with his performance on Thursday. Angry, partisan and flat out irrational are not qualities one wants in a Supreme Court Justice. There has been a lot of rumours since this started about Kavenaugh's beligerance and aggression and we saw that in spades on Thursday. He was utterly disrespectful to Democratic Senators. Especially the female Senators. And what's with blaming the Clintons? The crying, the yelling, the unhinged hysteria was exactly the kind of over the top denial that a guilty man would do trying to "sell" the idea of his innocence. Kind of like Trump's "witch hunt" rants.

A calm "judicial temperment" this is not and if anything, it supported the idea that this calm reasonable man is easily unhinged, makling untoward behaviour toward women that much more possible. Dr. Ford has also had her reputation permanently damaged and impugned. Dr. Ford has also had her life and that of her family threatened. Dr. Ford's life will never same after this hearing. And yet she was calm, reasonable, and very believable.

2. Then there's the lies. Kavenaugh has lied about any number of things throughout this confirmation hearing, starting with it was legal for him to drink in his senior year in high school. The legal drinking age in the state was 21 in 1982 so no he was not drinking legally. There have been other lies both large and small, but this issue isn't the size of the lies, it's that he lies about stuff at all. Honesty is part of the integrity that Kavenaugh says he has, but clearly if he habitually lies, then he has no integrity at all.

3. Then there's his very partisan and questionable work for the Starr Investigation, and his troubling occupation with Clinton's sexual history. Followed by his troubling work with the Bush Administration in promoting and rationalizing the use of torture. There's his public statements to the effect that no sitting President should be subject to indictment or prosecution until after he's left office.

4. And last but not least his appointment by a sitting President under investigation for indictable crimes, which investigation has sent a number of his associates and apppointees to jail, all but one of which has simply plead guilty and agreed to cooperate. The last guy was found guilty of a number of charges and chose to plead guilty to the rest and cooperate. That Trump is desperate to appoint people who are not only "loyal" but willing to protect him from the Mueller Investigation should make this appointment of a man who could help keep Trump out of court is to blantantly self serving that it should be denied.

5. Rowe v Wade.

His whole demeanor said he is NOT Supreme Court material.

 

[The Original Tree]

When Lindsey Graham gets an Investigation going on George Soros, Hillary Clinton and the DNC's Illegal activities, as well as Fusion GPS and COIE Lawfirm and Obama's and Clinton's Collusion with RUSSIA to try to overturn our elections, then I'll be interested in what Lindsey Graham has to say.

BTW, Tom Steyer should be investigated along with Soros. Both of these guys are subversive bad eggs.