Lindsey Graham Comes Out of the Closet, Finally! His Friends Are Shocked!

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
Examples of Globalization Lindsey Graham Comes Out of the Closet Finally His Friends Are Shocked

Senator Lindsey Graham is known as a pro Israel, pro war, senator who probably was picked on as a kid. Lindsey Graham is also the mouthy guy who said this about Republican prospects for the future:

“The demographics race we’re losing badly. We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.”

Well, now we have reports that Mr. Graham has come out of the closet. This has shocked his friends so much that they are afraid of the consequences!
Graham's friends are worried, because he came out of the closet the other day wild eyed, like he was in the mood for massive war in Iraq, which we broke because Yinon Zionism had a plan to break that nation back in 1982. Guess the Zionists never forget. And certainly no one could doubt that Graham is a non Jewish Zionist, supporting breaking up the middle east causing massive death as party fights party, sectarian group fights sectarian group, and innocent people are slaughtered daily or rendered homeless.​


So, for example, a balkanized Iraq, that gerrymandered relic of post-WWI colonial wizardry, under the thumb of a maniacal strongman makes sense to you, eh? You're not too fond of the Kurds either, I take it. Perhaps that's because many of them are non-Jewish Zionist too who wish to be free of the geopolitical artifice of modern Iraq.

But then who needs a strongman to suppress the ancient, natural inclinations of tribal/familial ties when we can arm the Islamofascist barbarians of the ISIS/ISIL to rid the world of these bothersome and uncooperative parasites in Iraq yearning to be free of the western collectivist's penchant for the geopolitical diplomacy of incongruent lovefests.
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
The father of Neoconservatism, was a political Zionist. He was an atheist and he never repudiated political Zionism. He said the elite should lie to the masses. One of his students was Paul Wolfowitz, who said Iraq was swimming on a sea of petroleum and planned the Iraq War for W Bush and Cheney. Neoconservatism adopted the Zionist concept of regime change. That is what we have had since 2000, regime change. You can't deny it Eagle.
And yet those nasty Israeli Zionists eschew the single-state solution for Iraq mindlessly imposed on the people thereof by the liberals and neoconservatives of the Washington establishment. And contrary to your claim elsewhere, those nasty Israeli Zionists opposed what those neoconservatives Lindsey and McCain supported, and what Obama did after he erased his red line in the sand, namely, the arming of the factious Muslim rebels in Syria.

http://www.ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idnews=4548
http://www.jns.org/news-briefs/2013/5/17/stephen-harper-defends-support-for-israel-opposes-arming-syrian-rebels#.VBH3C7l0yM8=
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.535829
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameszirin/2013/06/19/do-we-achieve-anything-by-sending-arms-to-the-syrian-rebels/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/dont-arm-rebels-before-vetting-them-israel-urges-us/
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-republicans-syria-arming/2013/05/07/id/503156/
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
Examples of Globalization Lindsey Graham Comes Out of the Closet Finally His Friends Are Shocked

Senator Lindsey Graham is known as a pro Israel, pro war, senator who probably was picked on as a kid. Lindsey Graham is also the mouthy guy who said this about Republican prospects for the future:

“The demographics race we’re losing badly. We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.”

Well, now we have reports that Mr. Graham has come out of the closet. This has shocked his friends so much that they are afraid of the consequences!
You seem like a "glass-half-empty" kind of guy.

And if you are like the average Liberal you will find it realllly difficult to stick to the facts from here on.

“The demographics race we’re losing badly. We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term.”

What I believe he was doing was tweaking the stereotypical belief about the Conservatives that the media like to portray. That the Right is nothing more than angry White guys.

And what I believe he is likely to have said next is that's why we need to reach out to minorities. Or something like that.

I haven't found, seen or read the in-context source of the quote but it is unlikely to be as the Liberals paint it.
Well, I don't know what ol' twist-and-shout Graham was up to in that instance, but I got no use for him or his sugar daddy McCain.
 
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
The father of Neoconservatism, was a political Zionist. He was an atheist and he never repudiated political Zionism. He said the elite should lie to the masses. One of his students was Paul Wolfowitz, who said Iraq was swimming on a sea of petroleum and planned the Iraq War for W Bush and Cheney. Neoconservatism adopted the Zionist concept of regime change. That is what we have had since 2000, regime change. You can't deny it Eagle.
And yet those nasty Israeli Zionists eschew the single-state solution for Iraq mindlessly imposed on the people thereof by the liberals and neoconservatives of the Washington establishment. And contrary to your claim elsewhere, those nasty Israeli Zionists opposed what those neoconservatives Lindsey and McCain supported, and what Obama did after he erased his red line in the sand, namely, the arming of the factious Muslim rebels in Syria.

http://www.ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idnews=4548
http://www.jns.org/news-briefs/2013/5/17/stephen-harper-defends-support-for-israel-opposes-arming-syrian-rebels#.VBH3C7l0yM8=
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.535829
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameszirin/2013/06/19/do-we-achieve-anything-by-sending-arms-to-the-syrian-rebels/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/dont-arm-rebels-before-vetting-them-israel-urges-us/
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-republicans-syria-arming/2013/05/07/id/503156/
You have to be careful with this. First, Israel wants the Caliphate to survive. Israel wants Iraq to be permanently broken up and Yinon Zionism teaches that very thing. Israel is on record supporting Kurdish independence. Israel has said that Iran is a much bigger threat and Israel wants the US to take out Iran, which Bradley said, is a bad idea.
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
Gary. You'll never get me to agree over Israel. Ever............Your use of the Zionist term is bigotry to me. If you want to discuss politics and include Zionist in your posts all the time you'll get flamed here and by me.

Stick to the topic of Graham. I have a problem with that Rhino scum bucket as well. Leave the Zionist crap at the door.
pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it disappear.
zionism and zionists exist and have helped undermine this nation....

But you guys don't appear to allow for the distinction between the "manifest destiny" of biblical Zionism and the Zionism
The father of Neoconservatism, was a political Zionist. He was an atheist and he never repudiated political Zionism. He said the elite should lie to the masses. One of his students was Paul Wolfowitz, who said Iraq was swimming on a sea of petroleum and planned the Iraq War for W Bush and Cheney. Neoconservatism adopted the Zionist concept of regime change. That is what we have had since 2000, regime change. You can't deny it Eagle.
And yet those nasty Israeli Zionists eschew the single-state solution for Iraq mindlessly imposed on the people thereof by the liberals and neoconservatives of the Washington establishment. And contrary to your claim elsewhere, those nasty Israeli Zionists opposed what those neoconservatives Lindsey and McCain supported, and what Obama did after he erased his red line in the sand, namely, the arming of the factious Muslim rebels in Syria.

http://www.ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idnews=4548
http://www.jns.org/news-briefs/2013/5/17/stephen-harper-defends-support-for-israel-opposes-arming-syrian-rebels#.VBH3C7l0yM8=
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.535829
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameszirin/2013/06/19/do-we-achieve-anything-by-sending-arms-to-the-syrian-rebels/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/dont-arm-rebels-before-vetting-them-israel-urges-us/
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-republicans-syria-arming/2013/05/07/id/503156/
You have to be careful with this. First, Israel wants the Caliphate to survive. Israel wants Iraq to be permanently broken up and Yinon Zionism teaches that very thing. Israel is on record supporting Kurdish independence. Israel has said that Iran is a much bigger threat and Israel wants the US to take out Iran, which Bradley said, is a bad idea.
But that's my whole point. The liberal and neoconservative establishment want a single-state Iraq, which is a disaster. Iraq should be broken up into three states along sectarian lines: Sunni, Shia and Kurdish. As for Iran, by and large, the Islamic Persians are not a threat to Israel. The Iranian regime is the threat to Israel and to the West as well.
 
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
Single state Iraq worked out just fine relative to what we have now. Now we have possibly millions killed in the Iraq War, we have beheadings, we have displacement in Syria. But the evil Zionists don't care because they moved 750 thousand Palestinians who had a shared right to the land, out and tortured the women and children and even stoned them. No, your doctrine is one of a killing social engineer, MD, or at least the ones you admire are. The middle east is now a mess. It is shameful what we have done in the name of Oded Yinon.
 

eagle1462010

Diamond Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
45,737
Reaction score
13,038
Points
2,180
Single state Iraq worked out just fine relative to what we have now. Now we have possibly millions killed in the Iraq War, we have beheadings, we have displacement in Syria. But the evil Zionists don't care because they moved 750 thousand Palestinians who had a shared right to the land, out and tortured the women and children and even stoned them. No, your doctrine is one of a killing social engineer, MD, or at least the ones you admire are. The middle east is now a mess. It is shameful what we have done in the name of Oded Yinon.
Yawn. Still with the Zionist BS.

It was just fine? Just forget the Iran/Iraq War which was Sunni verses Shia........... Forget that Saddam used Chemical Weapons on the Kurds, and forget that the Civil War in Iraq is about Religion and has been about religion for some time..................As you cherry pick data.

We went into Iraq after we got a Black eye. We were ticked and ready to whoop someones ass.........Saddam had given us grief before and we were still enforcing no fly zones in Iraq...........We went into Iraq because of WMD's............I believed they would find them as I know Marines in the 1st Gulf War whose's monitors went off due to Sarin..........Multiple vehicles at the same time.........more than likely because we blew the hell out of their ammo dumps and bunkers.............We didn't find them later.........I was surprised but know they had them in the past. That is my position on the why. I didn't agree with a prolonged campaign. I wanted to hit them hard and get the hell out because the region is a shit hole anyway.

I've already discussed the Arab Spring and its association with the Food riots...........Their prices for basic food went threw the roof and the whole area exploded................ISIS is part of that explosion and are Sunni's trying to restore their power that was lost when we took out Saddam............They are a radical Islamic Sect who want to kill anyone who doesn't believe as they believe..........Which makes this civil war and War in general over Religion.............

The different sects of Islam are killing each other because they think their religion is better.........If it wasn't for this there wouldn't be an ISIS at all.
 

eagle1462010

Diamond Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
45,737
Reaction score
13,038
Points
2,180
Gary. You'll never get me to agree over Israel. Ever............Your use of the Zionist term is bigotry to me. If you want to discuss politics and include Zionist in your posts all the time you'll get flamed here and by me.

Stick to the topic of Graham. I have a problem with that Rhino scum bucket as well. Leave the Zionist crap at the door.
pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it disappear.
zionism and zionists exist and have helped undermine this nation....

But you guys don't appear to allow for the distinction between the "manifest destiny" of biblical Zionism and the Zionism
The father of Neoconservatism, was a political Zionist. He was an atheist and he never repudiated political Zionism. He said the elite should lie to the masses. One of his students was Paul Wolfowitz, who said Iraq was swimming on a sea of petroleum and planned the Iraq War for W Bush and Cheney. Neoconservatism adopted the Zionist concept of regime change. That is what we have had since 2000, regime change. You can't deny it Eagle.
And yet those nasty Israeli Zionists eschew the single-state solution for Iraq mindlessly imposed on the people thereof by the liberals and neoconservatives of the Washington establishment. And contrary to your claim elsewhere, those nasty Israeli Zionists opposed what those neoconservatives Lindsey and McCain supported, and what Obama did after he erased his red line in the sand, namely, the arming of the factious Muslim rebels in Syria.

http://www.ipsnorthamerica.net/news.php?idnews=4548
http://www.jns.org/news-briefs/2013/5/17/stephen-harper-defends-support-for-israel-opposes-arming-syrian-rebels#.VBH3C7l0yM8=
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.535829
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jameszirin/2013/06/19/do-we-achieve-anything-by-sending-arms-to-the-syrian-rebels/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/dont-arm-rebels-before-vetting-them-israel-urges-us/
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/house-republicans-syria-arming/2013/05/07/id/503156/
You have to be careful with this. First, Israel wants the Caliphate to survive. Israel wants Iraq to be permanently broken up and Yinon Zionism teaches that very thing. Israel is on record supporting Kurdish independence. Israel has said that Iran is a much bigger threat and Israel wants the US to take out Iran, which Bradley said, is a bad idea.
But that's my whole point. The liberal and neoconservative establishment want a single-state Iraq, which is a disaster. Iraq should be broken up into three states along sectarian lines: Sunni, Shia and Kurdish. As for Iran, by and large, the Islamic Persians are not a threat to Israel. The Iranian regime is the threat to Israel and to the West as well.
I'm not against a 3 state option, but it will fail due to the resources such as oil, water and power. They'll never give up these assets without a fight. There is no denying that the regions are across versions of religion.
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
Single state Iraq worked out just fine relative to what we have now. Now we have possibly millions killed in the Iraq War, we have beheadings, we have displacement in Syria. But the evil Zionists don't care because they moved 750 thousand Palestinians who had a shared right to the land, out and tortured the women and children and even stoned them. No, your doctrine is one of a killing social engineer, MD, or at least the ones you admire are. The middle east is now a mess. It is shameful what we have done in the name of Oded Yinon.
Both you and eagle are seriously wrong about this. The artificial unification of three incompatible sectarian factions in a single-state Iraq cannot be maintained without a totalitarian strong man. That's the stability you're talking about, and nothing else but that! That's not a just or sustainable solution, and certainly the Kurds are not going to allow that to be imposed on them ever again and rightly so! Further, the current chaos is precisely due to the fact that a single-state solution is a balkanized monstrosity exacerbated by the rampage of ISIS/ISIL. Obama should have never armed the factious Syrian rebels. As for the Iraqi Shias and Sunnis let them kill each other if that's the best they can do with this historic opportunity. I say we back a western-friendly, independent Kurdistan and let the Iraqi Shias and Sunnis, who will never be reliable friends or allies, fend for themselves.
 
Last edited:
R

rdean

Guest
When Linda comes out of the closet, her career will be over. Not even Fox will want to touch her, er him, er, whatever.
 
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
Single state Iraq worked out just fine relative to what we have now. Now we have possibly millions killed in the Iraq War, we have beheadings, we have displacement in Syria. But the evil Zionists don't care because they moved 750 thousand Palestinians who had a shared right to the land, out and tortured the women and children and even stoned them. No, your doctrine is one of a killing social engineer, MD, or at least the ones you admire are. The middle east is now a mess. It is shameful what we have done in the name of Oded Yinon.
Yawn. Still with the Zionist BS.

It was just fine? Just forget the Iran/Iraq War which was Sunni verses Shia........... Forget that Saddam used Chemical Weapons on the Kurds, and forget that the Civil War in Iraq is about Religion and has been about religion for some time..................As you cherry pick data.

We went into Iraq after we got a Black eye. We were ticked and ready to whoop someones ass.........Saddam had given us grief before and we were still enforcing no fly zones in Iraq...........We went into Iraq because of WMD's............I believed they would find them as I know Marines in the 1st Gulf War whose's monitors went off due to Sarin..........Multiple vehicles at the same time.........more than likely because we blew the hell out of their ammo dumps and bunkers.............We didn't find them later.........I was surprised but know they had them in the past. That is my position on the why. I didn't agree with a prolonged campaign. I wanted to hit them hard and get the hell out because the region is a shit hole anyway.

I've already discussed the Arab Spring and its association with the Food riots...........Their prices for basic food went threw the roof and the whole area exploded................ISIS is part of that explosion and are Sunni's trying to restore their power that was lost when we took out Saddam............They are a radical Islamic Sect who want to kill anyone who doesn't believe as they believe..........Which makes this civil war and War in general over Religion.............

The different sects of Islam are killing each other because they think their religion is better.........If it wasn't for this there wouldn't be an ISIS at all.
You never read Yinon Zionism did you. Back in 1982, the Zionists had a plan based on the fact that different groups and religions were under Assad's father and in Iraq the same. The Yinon Zionists believe they could overthrow these people, and cause continual tribal war that would weaken them to the benefit of Israel. This macabre plan is evil to the core, and they even had the USA do it! So, the nations who held religions apart and peace was the order of the day though not perfect, were undone. And this is evil and wicked. God hates this sort of behavior. This is a quick summary of the plan.
2
The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

3

This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.


8220 Greater Israel 8221 The Zionist Plan for the Middle East Global Research
 
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
MD, sorry, that is the plan. It was adopted by the Neocons and implemented after Cheney manufactured 9/11 and it has gone according to plan and the blood is on the hands of the Zionists and neocon/Zionists who have caused this great evil.
 
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
As for you Eagle, you are blind either because you are incompetent or on purpose. Why don't you tell us which?
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
MD, sorry, that is the plan. It was adopted by the Neocons and implemented after Cheney manufactured 9/11 and it has gone according to plan and the blood is on the hands of the Zionists and neocon/Zionists who have caused this great evil.
I don't know what "Cheney manufactured 9/11" means, but what I do know is that the neocons and—come on, Gary!—the leftist establishment as well are wrong about imposing a single-state solution on the Iraqi people. Clearly, the Obama Administration is aggressively advocating the very same single-state doctrine as that of the Bush Administration. It's an unjust relic of post-WWI colonialism. It simply will not work without strong-man totalitarianism.

As for the Iraqi Shiites and Sunnis, it would be wonderful if they could work out their differences in a peaceful fashion with regard to their respective regional concerns, including an equitable division of oil reserves, but frankly Islam is a disease. I wish them well. Truly. But I don't know what we can possibly do for them if they cannot get past their sectarian differences and realize an accord that serves their mutual interests. Of course, the biggest hurdle is that the major oil deposits are in the Kurdish and Shiite regions of Iraq.
 

M.D. Rawlings

Classical Liberal
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
927
Points
190
Location
Heavenly Places
Single state Iraq worked out just fine relative to what we have now. Now we have possibly millions killed in the Iraq War, we have beheadings, we have displacement in Syria. But the evil Zionists don't care because they moved 750 thousand Palestinians who had a shared right to the land, out and tortured the women and children and even stoned them. No, your doctrine is one of a killing social engineer, MD, or at least the ones you admire are. The middle east is now a mess. It is shameful what we have done in the name of Oded Yinon.
Yawn. Still with the Zionist BS.

It was just fine? Just forget the Iran/Iraq War which was Sunni verses Shia........... Forget that Saddam used Chemical Weapons on the Kurds, and forget that the Civil War in Iraq is about Religion and has been about religion for some time..................As you cherry pick data.

We went into Iraq after we got a Black eye. We were ticked and ready to whoop someones ass.........Saddam had given us grief before and we were still enforcing no fly zones in Iraq...........We went into Iraq because of WMD's............I believed they would find them as I know Marines in the 1st Gulf War whose's monitors went off due to Sarin..........Multiple vehicles at the same time.........more than likely because we blew the hell out of their ammo dumps and bunkers.............We didn't find them later.........I was surprised but know they had them in the past. That is my position on the why. I didn't agree with a prolonged campaign. I wanted to hit them hard and get the hell out because the region is a shit hole anyway.

I've already discussed the Arab Spring and its association with the Food riots...........Their prices for basic food went threw the roof and the whole area exploded................ISIS is part of that explosion and are Sunni's trying to restore their power that was lost when we took out Saddam............They are a radical Islamic Sect who want to kill anyone who doesn't believe as they believe..........Which makes this civil war and War in general over Religion.............

The different sects of Islam are killing each other because they think their religion is better.........If it wasn't for this there wouldn't be an ISIS at all.
You never read Yinon Zionism did you. Back in 1982, the Zionists had a plan based on the fact that different groups and religions were under Assad's father and in Iraq the same. The Yinon Zionists believe they could overthrow these people, and cause continual tribal war that would weaken them to the benefit of Israel. This macabre plan is evil to the core, and they even had the USA do it! So, the nations who held religions apart and peace was the order of the day though not perfect, were undone. And this is evil and wicked. God hates this sort of behavior. This is a quick summary of the plan.
2
The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

3

This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.


8220 Greater Israel 8221 The Zionist Plan for the Middle East Global Research
Look, Eagle's assessment of the situation is correct. Simultaneously, Israel's interests are served by the breaking up of the various sectarian groups within Syria and Iraq artificially held together by strong-man totalitarianism/a dysfunctional parliamentary regime. I get that. Always have. So? I don't get your view that Israeli Zionism is evil while the collective threat that the Muslim Brotherhood's offshoot Hamas, a stable Syria allied with Iran and its proxy Hezbollah pose to Israel is the cat's meow. Further, the Kurds and the Persians are the only sane Muslims in the region, and are mostly friendly toward the West. As I said before, if not for the Iranian regime, the Islamic Persians of Iran would not pose a significant threat.

Explain to me why the Obama Administration continues to back the Muslim Brotherhood, sworn enemies of Israel and America, and did not aggressively get behind the Iranian uprising against the Islamofascist regime of Iran.

That's insane! Obama is a treasonous Manchurian, and how do you figure that the stratagem of turning the maniacs against one another or letting them fend for themselves is a "macabre plan . . . evil to the core"? Screw 'em!

I say we let them kill each other as we slam the rabid Sunnis of al-Qaeda and ISIS/ISIL, and, frankly, I think we should take Hezbollah and Hamas out too once and for all in a concerted American-Israeli operation. The hell with a Lebanese state run by dogs and the hell with a Palestinian state.

Indeed, now would be the perfect time to hit Hezbollah in Lebanon, once a jewel of a nation, while Assad has his hands full dealing with the Syrian rebels.
 
Last edited:
OP
Gary Anderson

Gary Anderson

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
339
Reaction score
22
Points
68
Location
Nevada
MD, I never said the Arabs were the cat's meow. What I am saying is that Zionism has no legitimacy based on the OT Torah, which said the New Zion would come in peace and be built by the Messiah. Instead, we have a fake Zion built by avowed atheists who were gnostic in saying the right of return existed right after the expulsion in 70 AD. Sorry, that right of return of a nation of Israel was not the will of God. These Zionists are the ENEMY of God.

The evil of occupation and of racism against Arab Israeli citizens as ruled recently by the Israeli Supreme Court are proofs of further wickedness.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top