What the hell is that rant all about? I mean you are absolutely stupid. I equated your unfounded fear of a man in a woman's restroom to the boogie man under the bed of a child. Do you tell the child they are right and have them come sleep in your bed? Well yeah, your lazy ass probably does. I told you that unfounded fear was the reason the ERA failed to pass, and yet you cling on to it like a clutch of pearls and spout off about women's rights. Do you support equal pay provisions for women? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't either. Do you support a woman's right to control her body? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't. Republicans opposed the Violence Against Women Act, did you?
And my wife stays home because she wants to. She has a title around here, "Boss". She runs the household, manages the finances, plans the vacations, and I do as I am told. The exact opposite of the Holy Roller household where the man is king and the woman is supposed to be a dutiful servant to her husband. I would not have anything to do with a woman with that little self-esteem.
The so-called Equal Rights Amendment was defeated because common sense prevailed against the attempt to foist the feminazi empowerment of the state in violation of the imperatives of natural law, including the familial rights of the people, and biological realities.
Do you support equal pay provisions for women? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't either. Do you support a woman's right to control her body? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't. Republicans opposed the Violence Against Women Act, did you? --Winston
Behold the doublespeak of statist bootlicks.
. . . a dutiful servant to her husband. --Winston
That's
helpmate to you, heathen.
I do as I am told. --Winston
Sissy.
Natural law, familial rights, biological realities--all code words signaling ignorance and excuses. I don't understand how a man can call themselves a man if they have a fear of empowered women. Come to think about it, fear is the driving force behind almost all the positions of the right. Fear of people of color, fear of foreigners, fear of poor people, fear of vaccines, fear of the government. In fact, the only time the right is willing to accept government intervention is when they are afraid of something. And fear is nothing more than a sign of weakness and insecurity. No wonder you guys want to subjugate women, you sure as hell are not going to attract them with weakness and insecurity.
That is absolutely hilarious, coming from the most misogynistic prick I've met in years. You've made it clear that the only "empowerment" you want women to have is to happily go along with whatever you've decided they should think is best for them. It's painfully obvious to everyone by your hostility to a woman daring to hold an opinion you didn't authorize that YOU fear women who are truly empowered enough to think for themselves.
You can make accusations about others "subjugating women" when YOU aren't advocating policies to turn us into government property. Or even when you can manage to stop lecturing women long enough to listen to them.
You're a woman-hating bastard, Winston, and you're a bad person. You are none of the things you just pompously proclaimed yourself, and you are all the things you outrageously presumed to accuse others of being. You make women's lives worse. You are everything we have fought against for over a century. Some woman should kick you in your balls . . . if she can find them.
Freaking hilarious, as if you actually do think for yourself. You show me one damn example of a transgender female in a woman's restroom assaulting other women. Show me one or STFU. If you could pull your head out of your ass long enough, research the whole man in a woman's restroom scare, it was initiated by none other than Phyllis Schlafly. It was part of the STOP ERA movement, STOP standing for Stop Taking Our Privileges. Top of the list, women having separate bathrooms. Foolish.
Furthermore, I have never told you that you don't have the right to be a complete idiot. I have merely tried to show you that there is no damn boogieman under the bed. Your argument against transgender people going to the bathroom of the sex they identify with is unfounded and illogical. But if you want to be stupid, be stupid. Same for the sports argument. As I have mentioned in this thread, almost 200 transgender females currently participate in NCAA sports with almost no drama. Thankfully, the younger generation is much more receptive to diversity than your tired ass, old, soon to be gone, generation. And those transgender female athletes are required to go through a full year of testosterone reduction therapy before they can even participate. Then they are subject to testing with a maximum testosterone level somewhere close to one fifth that of a normal male. No perv is going to go through all that just to notch a win against women in some sporting competition. Your position on both issues is one of sheer ignorance and your continued howls only conflagrate that ignorance.
More misogyny. May I ask what gave you the idea that YOU get to set the parameters for whether or not I can feel concerned for my safety and my rights? What is it about having a penis - and a very tiny one, judging by how threatened you are by women who dare to disagree with you - that makes you think you get to declare, "Well, if women aren't being assaulted specifically by transgenders, then they don't get to feel unsafe and they have to be okay with whatever I decide is right for their bodies"? You might as well have a flashing sign over your head that reads, "I don't listen to what women say, because they might be smarter than me."
Try to think past your testosterone fog and actually hear me, boy.
1) It does not have to be the mental patients stuffing their dicks into panties assaulting women for your pandering to their fantasies to endanger us. Laws and rules allowing biological males to enter private female spaces like restrooms and locker rooms simply by declaring they "identify as female" will open the door to predators using it as a dodge to get close to their victims. If your substandard brain stem can't figure that out, then it is only because you yourself - selfish Cro-Mag that you are - have never had to think in terms of possibly being victimized, the way women routinely do. Or maybe it's because you're such a woman-hater than you identify with the predators.
2) I don't have to prove jack shit to you in order to "earn" the right to demand control over my privacy and my body and who does and does not get to be present around me in private areas. My body does not belong to you, and it does not belong to the government, and it is immoral and wrong for either of you to declare that you get to decide who I should and should not undress in front of on the basis of YOUR worldview.
So . . . do you want to try that, "Sit down and shut up, you stupid broad, while I tell you what you really want and what's best for you" routine again? It's doing a marvelous job of making my case for me.
I am going to post this statement,
Laws and rules allowing biological males to enter private female spaces like restrooms and locker rooms simply by declaring they "identify as female" will open the door to predators using it as a dodge to get close to their victims.
What the hell is that rant all about? I mean you are absolutely stupid. I equated your unfounded fear of a man in a woman's restroom to the boogie man under the bed of a child. Do you tell the child they are right and have them come sleep in your bed? Well yeah, your lazy ass probably does. I told you that unfounded fear was the reason the ERA failed to pass, and yet you cling on to it like a clutch of pearls and spout off about women's rights. Do you support equal pay provisions for women? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't either. Do you support a woman's right to control her body? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't. Republicans opposed the Violence Against Women Act, did you?
And my wife stays home because she wants to. She has a title around here, "Boss". She runs the household, manages the finances, plans the vacations, and I do as I am told. The exact opposite of the Holy Roller household where the man is king and the woman is supposed to be a dutiful servant to her husband. I would not have anything to do with a woman with that little self-esteem.
The so-called Equal Rights Amendment was defeated because common sense prevailed against the attempt to foist the feminazi empowerment of the state in violation of the imperatives of natural law, including the familial rights of the people, and biological realities.
Do you support equal pay provisions for women? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't either. Do you support a woman's right to control her body? Your party doesn't, I bet you don't. Republicans opposed the Violence Against Women Act, did you? --Winston
Behold the doublespeak of statist bootlicks.
. . . a dutiful servant to her husband. --Winston
That's
helpmate to you, heathen.
I do as I am told. --Winston
Sissy.
Natural law, familial rights, biological realities--all code words signaling ignorance and excuses. I don't understand how a man can call themselves a man if they have a fear of empowered women. Come to think about it, fear is the driving force behind almost all the positions of the right. Fear of people of color, fear of foreigners, fear of poor people, fear of vaccines, fear of the government. In fact, the only time the right is willing to accept government intervention is when they are afraid of something. And fear is nothing more than a sign of weakness and insecurity. No wonder you guys want to subjugate women, you sure as hell are not going to attract them with weakness and insecurity.
That is absolutely hilarious, coming from the most misogynistic prick I've met in years. You've made it clear that the only "empowerment" you want women to have is to happily go along with whatever you've decided they should think is best for them. It's painfully obvious to everyone by your hostility to a woman daring to hold an opinion you didn't authorize that YOU fear women who are truly empowered enough to think for themselves.
You can make accusations about others "subjugating women" when YOU aren't advocating policies to turn us into government property. Or even when you can manage to stop lecturing women long enough to listen to them.
You're a woman-hating bastard, Winston, and you're a bad person. You are none of the things you just pompously proclaimed yourself, and you are all the things you outrageously presumed to accuse others of being. You make women's lives worse. You are everything we have fought against for over a century. Some woman should kick you in your balls . . . if she can find them.
Freaking hilarious, as if you actually do think for yourself. You show me one damn example of a transgender female in a woman's restroom assaulting other women. Show me one or STFU. If you could pull your head out of your ass long enough, research the whole man in a woman's restroom scare, it was initiated by none other than Phyllis Schlafly. It was part of the STOP ERA movement, STOP standing for Stop Taking Our Privileges. Top of the list, women having separate bathrooms. Foolish.
Furthermore, I have never told you that you don't have the right to be a complete idiot. I have merely tried to show you that there is no damn boogieman under the bed. Your argument against transgender people going to the bathroom of the sex they identify with is unfounded and illogical. But if you want to be stupid, be stupid. Same for the sports argument. As I have mentioned in this thread, almost 200 transgender females currently participate in NCAA sports with almost no drama. Thankfully, the younger generation is much more receptive to diversity than your tired ass, old, soon to be gone, generation. And those transgender female athletes are required to go through a full year of testosterone reduction therapy before they can even participate. Then they are subject to testing with a maximum testosterone level somewhere close to one fifth that of a normal male. No perv is going to go through all that just to notch a win against women in some sporting competition. Your position on both issues is one of sheer ignorance and your continued howls only conflagrate that ignorance.
More misogyny. May I ask what gave you the idea that YOU get to set the parameters for whether or not I can feel concerned for my safety and my rights? What is it about having a penis - and a very tiny one, judging by how threatened you are by women who dare to disagree with you - that makes you think you get to declare, "Well, if women aren't being assaulted specifically by transgenders, then they don't get to feel unsafe and they have to be okay with whatever I decide is right for their bodies"? You might as well have a flashing sign over your head that reads, "I don't listen to what women say, because they might be smarter than me."
Try to think past your testosterone fog and actually hear me, boy.
1) It does not have to be the mental patients stuffing their dicks into panties assaulting women for your pandering to their fantasies to endanger us. Laws and rules allowing biological males to enter private female spaces like restrooms and locker rooms simply by declaring they "identify as female" will open the door to predators using it as a dodge to get close to their victims. If your substandard brain stem can't figure that out, then it is only because you yourself - selfish Cro-Mag that you are - have never had to think in terms of possibly being victimized, the way women routinely do. Or maybe it's because you're such a woman-hater than you identify with the predators.
2) I don't have to prove jack shit to you in order to "earn" the right to demand control over my privacy and my body and who does and does not get to be present around me in private areas. My body does not belong to you, and it does not belong to the government, and it is immoral and wrong for either of you to declare that you get to decide who I should and should not undress in front of on the basis of YOUR worldview.
(B)So . . . do you want to try that, "Sit down and shut up, you stupid broad, while I tell you what you really want and what's best for you" routine again? It's doing a marvelous job of making my case for me.(/B)
Look, I am just going to put it to you straight up. This,
Laws and rules allowing biological males to enter private female spaces like restrooms and locker rooms simply by declaring they "identify as female" will open the door to predators using it as a dodge to get close to their victims.
Is just stupid. Do you really think all the perverts are sitting at home choppin at the bit, waiting for the opportunity that allowing transgender individual access to the restroom of their choice is going to provide? Like I said, stupid. If they are perverts they are coming in any damn way. They don't need that damn cover. And it wouldn't be cover. If a pervert goes into the restroom of the opposite sex and assaults someone, their ass is going to jail, they can scream transgender all the hell they want. Assault is illegal no matter what.
Furthermore, you have probably shared the bathroom with a transgender individual and you never even knew it. Are you in the habit of gawking at other people's sex organs when you go to a public restroom? If so, then perhaps you are the pervert. And considering you now have seemingly obsessed with the size of my organ, I think we might be on to something.
I mean you are so damn self-absorbed that you want to force transgender individuals to be uncomfortable to satisfy your own unfounded and illogical self-delusions. I mean are you really that comfortable with some butch looking girl coming in to the female restroom to check out potential sexual partners, because that is exactly what you are advocating. Transgender males, looking for female partners, is who you want to share a restroom with. Transgender females, who have no sexual desire for you whatsoever, is who you want to keep out. Hell, maybe to appease your ignorant and antiquated viewpoints we should have six different restrooms. The damn truth is that public restrooms divided by sex is a pretty recent thing. You would have had a hell of a time in ancient Greece or Rome.
I just heard, "Oh, you silly *****. I, who do not have to worry about sexual predators because I'm a male, know much better about the dangers to women than you, a woman, does."
THAT is what is "just stupid", asshole. Let's just break this down into the various straw men you set up so that you could avoid having to think about the the damage that your selfish pursuit of your agenda causes, shall we?
"Do you really think all the perverts are sitting at home choppin at the bit, waiting for the opportunity that allowing transgender individual access to the restroom of their choice is going to provide?"
It is frankly disgusting to me that I even have to explain these self-evident facts to you, because you're so utterly indifferent to anyone other than yourself. Sexual predators are opportunists. They DO, in fact, spend their time searching for any possible way to get access to their preferred victim group. Child molesters look for jobs and houses that put them near large numbers of children who are unsupervised. Rapists look for locations where women will be alone and vulnerable. So yes, if you set up a law that says biological men entering women's restrooms and locker rooms CAN'T be challenged or prevented from doing so if they claim to "identify as a woman", it is obvious to anyone with a modicum of common sense that sexual predators are going to leap on that opportunity.
A transgender Wyoming woman was convicted Thursday of sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl inside a bathroom.
www.foxnews.com
Police in northwest suburban Palatine were searching for a man who tried to use his cell phone to record video of a girl in a Target dressing room.
chicago.cbslocal.com
Providence man faces video voyeurism charges out of Warwick and Lincoln.
www.wpri.com
The American Family Association is praising Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for urging Target to re-examine its controversial transgender bathroom policies after a second man was caught recording women undressing in changing rooms.
www.foxnews.com
Shoppers in Brick, New Jersey are on edge after a man was seen taking pictures of women changing in the stall next to him in a unisex Target dressing room.
abc7ny.com
I'm amused by your theory of, "The perverts are coming anyway, so why do we need to make rules against them doing it?" That's the equivalent of "Why have laws against murder, because people are going to kill each other anyway?" Here's the thing, Chuckles. The idea is to make public restrooms, locker rooms, etc. HARDER places for them to get victims, so that they - being opportunists, as I had to explain to you before - will give it up and go find an easier target. And the problem with your, "If they commit a sexual assault, then you just prosecute them and problem solved!!!" scenario is that, as the potential victim, I WOULD LIKE TO ARRANGE IT SO THE SEXUAL ASSAULT DOESN'T HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. Because duuuuhhh, Mensa Boy.
Furthermore, what the **** does, "Well, someone probably already violated your privacy without your permission" have to do with anything? Would you tell your wife or your daughter, "Well, you've already been raped once, so why does it matter if another man rapes you, too?" What the **** are you even talking about? The whole point here is I'm protesting that very violation of my personal sovereignty and control over my body, you fucknut!
You are absolutely, 100% ******* right that I am "self-absorbed" enough to want a miniscule percentage of mentally ill men to be uncomfortable rather than A) surrender control over my body to the state and misogynistic fucktards like you, and B) put myself at greater risk of sexual assault. If it's okay for THEM to be so self-absorbed as to say, "I don't care what effect it has on anyone else, I want validation of my delusion!!!" then I have no problem asserting my own self-interest in opposition. And I'm certainly not going to be shamed into surrendering my privacy and safety by the likes of YOU.
I'm not even responding to the rest of this point-by-point, because all I really need to say is that it's not for YOU to lecture me on who I do and don't want to share a restroom with, because IT'S NOT YOUR DECISION TO MAKE. It's not your body. It's not your privacy. It's not your safety. Even knowing what an anti-woman hunk of insecure, chauvinistic garbage you are, I am appalled at the idea that I even have to address such breathtaking arrogance. Save your mansplaining explanations for subjects that are even remotely your business; my life is not one of those subjects.
