Libs consider hate crimes charges should zimmerman be acquitted

[novasteve]

George Zimmerman: Hate Crime Charge Possible?

How desperate. Being out the lynch mob libs if you don't get your way

 

[Katzndogz]

Self defense hate?

If Zimmerman is acquitted on the basis of self defense, there can be no "self defense motivated by hate" prosecution. They have to find other charges.

 

[novasteve]

Littering isn't a crime but rather an infraction but libs wanted to charge people with putting bacon on the ground with hate crimes and the police considered it in New York

 

[syrenn]

martin is dead.... how are they going to charge him for a hate crime?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

 

[USNavyVet]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

The hate crime seems to be Trayvon's crime. Attacking that "creepy ass cracker" certainly sounds racist. I didn't hear George say I'm gonna get that ******.

 

[boedicca]

Putting Zimmerman on trial is in and of itself a hate crime aided and abetted by Obama.

A Hispanic man was targeted because he has an white sounding name. And the Pravda Press supported the hate crime with their White Hispanic label.

 

[Katzndogz]

It was only proved that Trayvon Martin was a racist and used racial slurs. Zimmerman never did, despite the editing of CBS.

Pretty much everyone is passing on the serious issue. Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman profiled one another. Martin thought Zimmerman was a guy he could easily take down. Zimmerman thought Martin was a thug. This is the state of the whole country. That's what caused this incident. The nation is on the edge and no one mentions it. They hide it and make up nice stories about rights.

 

[PredFan]

There is even less evidence of a hate crime than there is of murder.

 

[Sunshine]

George Zimmerman: Hate Crime Charge Possible?

How desperate. Being out the lynch mob libs if you don't get your way

 

[R.C. Christian]

Jews can't be charged with hate crimes.

 

[syrenn]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

as far as i can tell... the "victim" was the only one engaging in hate speech.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yes, liberals hate haters who hate, and will do anything to deal with haters hating. Come on. Liberals should be trying THEMSELVES for hate crimes instead.

 

[Moonglow]

amateur words at best describes what people do on USMB stating opinions and not facts.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

There is no provision of the law to ‘punish thought.’

Indeed, citizens are at liberty to express the most hateful forms of racism and bigotry protected by First Amendment jurisprudence.

When that speech becomes action, however, the state is then authorized to enact punitive measures against those who seek to harm someone solely as a consequence of his race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin.

If Zimmerman was motivated by the hateful racist myth that young African-American males are ‘predisposed to crime’, then a Federal criminal civil rights violations prosecution is warranted.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

There is no provision of the law to ‘punish thought.’

Indeed, citizens are at liberty to express the most hateful forms of racism and bigotry protected by First Amendment jurisprudence.

When that speech becomes action, however, the state is then authorized to enact punitive measures against those who seek to harm someone solely as a consequence of his race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin.

If Zimmerman was motivated by the hateful racist myth that young African-American males are ‘predisposed to crime’, then a Federal criminal civil rights violations prosecution is warranted.

Zimmerman, who is not a white Jew, was motivated by a 17 year old black pounding his fucking head into the pavement

 

[Rozman]

George Zimmerman: Hate Crime Charge Possible?

How desperate. Being out the lynch mob libs if you don't get your way

If Zimmerman is convicted on either charge then Libs will feel justice was done.
If Zimmerman is acquitted then Rev Al will lead the nation in calling for protests and
any charge of civil rights violations....This will not end if an acquittal is reached.

 

[jknowgood]

By the liberals on here and their reasoning and approval of treyvones crazy white a#* cracker remark. Maybe zimmeram should've said what up you crazy a#@ ni#%&er before he shot him. Since racial slurs are okay by liberals now. Not to mention he was getting his head beat into the asphalt when he shot him.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Well, it was a hate crime but what we need to do is get rid of that whole notion. Yes, it was proven that GZ is a racist but that should not enter into it.

Punish the crime, not the thought.

Trayvon had every right to be where he was and he had every right to walk, carry candle and tea and have a hoodie on. He was not breaking a law. He was minding his business.

The opposite of what GZ was doing. He followed, stalked even after Trayvon tried to get away and then he accosted him. When Trayvon "stood his ground and defended himself", GZ murdered him.

The "stand your ground law" should have applied to the victim but instead, it has been used to get GZ a walk for a cold blooded murder that the little scum bag has had the nerve to blame on god.

There is no provision of the law to ‘punish thought.’

Indeed, citizens are at liberty to express the most hateful forms of racism and bigotry protected by First Amendment jurisprudence.

When that speech becomes action, however, the state is then authorized to enact punitive measures against those who seek to harm someone solely as a consequence of his race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin.

If Zimmerman was motivated by the hateful racist myth that young African-American males are ‘predisposed to crime’, then a Federal criminal civil rights violations prosecution is warranted.

Except there is no evidence of that at all. In fact the 911 operator had to drag Martin's race out of Zimmerman. Further Zimmerman has blacks in his immediate family.