Valox
Senior Member
- Dec 1, 2011
- 1,023
- 129
- 48
Wow, IOW you do not know how to vote without your husband.
I am in a state a of shock. Wow.......
Libertarians for Romney
- Thread starter dblack
- Start date
Wow, IOW you do not know how to vote without your husband.
I am in a state a of shock. Wow.......
Avorysuds
Gold Member
You God people really scare the crap outta me. But I guess it buys the votes.
Good luck with Liberal Obama and Liberal Mitt... God is on your side somehow, I'm sure of it!
Good luck with Liberal Obama and Liberal Mitt... God is on your side somehow, I'm sure of it!
Avorysuds
Gold Member
Yeah I was not sure I read that right, she does not seem to be a heavy thinker. Sorry to hear about her husband though, but maybe the bright side is she might get a taste of freedom? Her choice, and I'm not here to change how she lives her life.
The T
George S. Patton Party
Avorysuds
Gold Member
~
Valox
Senior Member
- Dec 1, 2011
- 1,023
- 129
- 48
"and I promised him I would not cancel his vote as his obedient wife"
WTF does that even mean?
The T
George S. Patton Party
That means that she is PART of a family unit and understands that her place in joining with her bethrothed means they DO what BEST for the family as a unit as they try to live thier lives as THEY see fit.
It's a committment of love and honor to a higher purpose.
As far too many have a lack of not only for thier own families but to this Republic and the practice of Liberty itself as the founders guaranteed ALL of us in the Constitution.
*You* are so far short-sided in your thought process that I had to muster much energy to even acknowledge it as thought save that you were typing on a keyboard.
Does HONOR reside in your lexicon?
Valox
Senior Member
- Dec 1, 2011
- 1,023
- 129
- 48
No, it means she is slave and did not have the capability to even vote for herself.
Once again, go fuck yourself.
The T
George S. Patton Party
freedombecki
Let's go swimmin'!
We're scarey? You're the one yammering predestination snipes.
But it's ok. The only thing you forgot is that Romney has always been a closet conservative. They beat him up with that on his race for Governor of Massachusetts.
Hmmm, Conservative. Fancy that.
freedombecki
Let's go swimmin'!
It means when I married him 41 years ago, I wanted everything to go his way. I learned later he wanted everything to go my way. We're total opposites in all other ways. He's tall. I'm short. He's laid back. I'm an A-type.But it works. I didn't get to be a conservative overnight, because I was an independent and went play by play. Then we moved to another neighborhood. My neighbor was a very conservative lady. We had a lot of discussions, but I had to concede, because she proved to me the only way to keep our government small was by never voting for spending that could be accomplished in the private sector. She knew what my husband also knew. The free market works, people who accumulate money based on fair play distribute it fairly through charity, support of community projects, etc. Our state taxes where we lived always stayed low. No income tax, 4% sales tax, low property taxes. Sunshine 300 days a year... hahahaha
Does everything have to have meaning? Life is to be enjoyed, not lugubriously overstudied! Lighten up! Enjoy it. You only get one time to go around. Make it count. That's all it means. If you play nice, you get some really nice surprises. Just sayin'.
So what you are saying is that you are going to vote for a socialist with marxist leanings because your guy did not make it. Are you taking your toys and stomping off mad and going home to pout why you hand Obama another 4 years to further destroy this country.
I say- GROW UP.
Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,602
- 1,968
- 245
I'm sorry, where exactly did he say that?
frazzledgear
Senior Member
- Mar 17, 2008
- 1,479
- 544
- 48
Well, some can and some cannot stand a big umbrella and sharing it with other human beings, Valox. I cannot fault a man or a woman for that. I can't stand living in a city although I was born in a metropolis. I can't even stand suburbia. I live out in the country, because I feel free here. I love wild creatures and birds, and I am not committed to thick concrete antbed societies, I like waking up not smelling someone else's bacon cooking, thank you.
Yet I can look on the good side of people who have an axe to grind that merits a response. It is not in me to judge someone else's anger when they're so much like historical characters who are indeed first in my heart as an American citizen.
We're a diverse nation, and we have more than 320,000,000 mouths to feed. Not everyone can be lucky like me and wake up to see beautiful endangered species from their bay window. And for this privilege, I bless America and embrace citizens from many walks of life who ain't so lucky as me.
WTF are you babbling about?
Being a libertarian, I have an axe to grind with Republicans who want me to rethink for voting Republicans. All I can say is go fuck yourself. I believe in individualism and free markets and will not vote for a Republican.
Republicans love to expand our debt, attack liberties, and practice crony capitalism. I have nothing in common with you and will never think of voting for Republican.
So we can assume you don't vote at all, right? Because PLEASE don't insult our intelligence by pretending libertarians have far more in common with the leftwing extremist controlled Democrat party, ok? Republicans can't hold a candle to the Democrats' love affair with massive, all powerful out of control spending government -nor with their nonstop assault of our REAL rights while pretending our rights are nothing but the goods and services produced by others we covet -and if we call them a "right" obligates others to GIVE them to us. Libertarians first and foremost value INDIVIDUALISM -but Democrats reject it for group rights, also rejecting the very American concept that if all individuals have identical rights, then by definition so do all groups. Group rights are in fact a way of giving greater power to some -at the expense of non-group members -and everyone with a functioning IQ knows it. So again -if you insist Republicans are scum sucking bottom feeders you will never vote for -it must mean you don't vote at all since Democrats have even LESS in common with libertarianism than Republicans -and to pretend otherwise is either an outright lie or a gross display of your own chosen ignorance.
You claim Republicans are constantly assaulting our real rights -which ones listed in the Bill of Rights are under assault by Republicans? I can list the REAL rights under constant assault by DEMOCRATS -for decades. Including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to bear arms -anything that empowers the individual, Democrats oppose while everything that empowers the state, Democrats support. Did you know Democrats passed a law claiming government had the right and power to decide who was and was not a legitimate minister of any given church -and not the churches? Were you aware this was struck down by the Supreme Court in a 9-0 ruling? Why would the liberal media refuse to report on this when any Republican driven law and supported ONLY by Republicans that was stricken down in a 9-0 ruling would be THE leading news story for WEEKS, if not months? So again -what are the rights you think are at greater risk under Republicans than Democrats again? And tell us you know the definition of "statism", ok? Because you clearly also can't identify the party most closely identified with that either. You do realize it is just another word for COMMUNISM, right? Are you seriously going to suggest it is Republicans pursuing LEFTWING communist policies in this country? ROFL
There is a reason Libertarians always caucus with Republicans and NEVER with Democrats -so go ahead and tell us you figured out why that is. There is a reason Libertarians will run for the Republican nomination for President -but never seek the Democrat nomination for President. Again, tell us you know why that is!
Democrats offer the same cookie cutter "solution" to every conceivable issue there is -to increase yet again an already bloated, inefficient, massive, powerful government intent on sucking the lifeblood from our country. Leftwing extremism seeks the totalitarian state -but Libertarians are rightwing extremists who seek the least government possible. While ranting about Republicans -you just MIGHT want to keep in mind Democrats had TOTAL control of our federal government for two solid years. HOW DID THAT WORK OUT FOR US, HUH? Got a big itch for a few more years of watching nothing POVERTY and the already bloated size of government grow in this country or what? It took TOTAL Democrat control to get the highest rate of poverty seen in more than 50 years. To go along with government being THE biggest, most wasteful, most bloated on an out of control spending spree in our entire history. That is what Democrats with total control produce -massive poverty and massive government. And under THEIR control with super majorities in both houses of Congress and control of the White House and not needing even one Republican vote -went on their out of control wet dream spending spree, refused (and STILL refuse) to do THEIR FUCKING JOB of passing a budget -for the express purpose of avoiding accountability by WE THE PEOPLE. And no other reason. If they don't commit the numbers to paper, then they can't be held accountable for their OUT OF CONTROL SPENDING SPREE -a problem which they insist is all because we aren't being taxed enough and not the truth that they went out of control with their spending, putting this nation on the fast track to bankruptcy where we face the identical future of Greece. That future was a few decades out prior to Democrats getting super majorities -but they quickly turned that into less than FOUR FUCKING YEARS. And every serious attempt to start a discussion about getting control of the spending spree we can't pay for only shows Democrats must WANT to bankrupt our country -because they only respond with lies and pretending there is no need to stop spending ANY of it -and we only need to hit the wealthy, already footing the bulk of the bills anyway -with even higher taxes. Even though doing so won't do a FUCKING THING to prevent our financial COLLAPSE. When they go to such lengths to keep up this rate of spending knowing full well that left unchanged will have only ONE outcome -then what does it take before YOU realize bankruptcy IS their goal? The same people playing their usual PATHETIC and totally useless class warfare politics with that stupid MORON Obama pushing his STUPID "Buffet rule" insisting success is something shameful that needs to be punished and the wealthy must not be allowed to enjoy the fruits of their labor -it is somehow more "fair" if government just confiscates it, right? So if it is so important NOW -why didn't Democrats pass that when they had TOTAL control of Congress and didn't need even one Republican vote? Hmm? Why wait until he is trying to cling to power to drag out one more anti-American class warfare policy that is nearly identical to so many communist ones? You know -the ones that are historically proven to fail and only increase poverty and the level of human misery.
It took Republicans gaining control of the House to get our SOME of elected representatives to do their FUCKING JOB and pass a budget. But since the Senate is still under Democrat control -they still refuse to do their FUCKING JOB. How can anyone justify keeping Senate Democrats in office any longer when they refuse to do the FUCKING JOB they were elected to do?
Can you guess whether or not I support a law -even if it requires a constitutional amendment - that prevents every single member of both houses of Congress from collecting their paycheck when either or both houses of Congress refuse to do their FUCKING JOBS? If it takes a law that prevent ANYONE from being paid if some of them refuse to do their FUCKING JOB they were elected to do -so be it.
No libertarian in their right mind faced with nothing but a Republican and a modern day Democrat candidate for President -would EVER vote for the Democrat. Ever. Again -there is a reason libertarians elected to Congress caucus with Republicans -and NEVER with Democrats. The true statists in love with the all powerful, bloated, massive out of control government - are not Republicans you MORON. And if you had a shred of intellectual honesty you would have already known that.
So -do you want to keep pretending you are a libertarian or given the fact your rants are reserved for the one party that is FAR closer to libertarian principles -do you want to go ahead and just admit you haven't a clue what a libertarian even is. Leftwing extremism -which controls the new Democrat party -and individualism are INCOMPATIBLE -by definition. No getting around that, sorry. Which is at the root of why libertarians caucus with Republicans -and NEVER with Democrats. Duh.
Last edited:
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Better Obama than Romney.
- Thread starter
- #196
Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,387
- 1,830
ThinkCritically
Open to opinion
This is how pathetic we have become. No one has any guts, and they definitely don't learn from the past. I don't get it. every fucking election is decided by people who vote for the lesser of two evils. The mob....the achilles heel of democracy.
Valox has a lot to learn. How many of us libertarian thinking people have always thought this way? I supported Bush early on, I was in my teens but nonetheless my first political views were neonconservative. Once I learned how this country works, or doesn't, I changed them completely.
Gotta help people learn, rather than alienate them. People actually think they're doing the right thing by voting for the liberal Obama or the liberal Romney, and you need to show them the error in their ways. Btw how do you prefer to be taught? By having the teacher talk down to you and insult you or by them enlightening you with new information from a different perspective?
Gotta help people learn, rather than alienate them. People actually think they're doing the right thing by voting for the liberal Obama or the liberal Romney, and you need to show them the error in their ways. Btw how do you prefer to be taught? By having the teacher talk down to you and insult you or by them enlightening you with new information from a different perspective?
Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Technically, to RETURN the Republican party to it's traditional Libertarian positions. Calvin Coolidge was a Libertarian by any measure of the term.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Colombian presidential candidate in critical condition after being shot in the head- Started by JGalt
- Replies: 4
-
-
The Modern Weaponization of Our National Security System Is The Lasting Legacy of Barack Obama and Eric Holder- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 2
-
