I have no need of a link to an event I already expounded on right in this thread, two weeks ago. As soon as I saw the bogus thread title.
But it is revealing that you'll characterize those who correct the obvious blatant mythology as "booger eating moron snowflakes". Does the revelation hurt? Tough titty.
1924 democrat convention was refereed to as the Clanbake. look it up or keep your tiny brain tiny and your head in the sand. I couldn't care less.
No, that's "Klanbake" with a K, and it refers to the Klan's push at that convention which was held in New York, not Wisconsin, where the Klan camped out in New Jersey. They were pushing against the loudest voice denouncing the Klan, which was not "Forney Johnston" (who was dead over ten years by then) but Oscar Underwood, along with Al Smith, for fear of having a presidential candidate denounce them. They succeeded in blocking Underwood and Smith, but the eventual compromise candidate John Davis --- went ahead and denounced them anyway. After that the Klan endorsed the only major candy who didn't denounce them, Calvin Coolidge, and took credit when he won. And then four years later they campaigned against Al Smith and took credit when Hoover won.
But of course I already went through all this two weeks ago and here you are expecting different results.
The fact remains, the Democratic convention was in New York (not Wisconsin), the photo is from 1924, not by any means "newly discovered", the Senator leading the charge against the KKK was Oscar Underwood, not "Forney Johnston", and there's no reason Liberals would somehow "not like" a photo of some Klan marchers in Wisconsin unrelated to any of that.
That's already been raked over the coals (again, 2 weeks ago) and there ain't a damn thing you can do about it.