Liberals are supposed to think, but US liberals only parrot

LaDexter

Gold Member
Jun 5, 2016
10,361
843
290
US liberals are not liberal. They aren't thinkers. They do not tolerate dissent. They parrot lies and hate those who out those lies as lies.

Global Warming is probably the greatest example. Here we have something liberals "believe" because they validate Joseph Goebbels.... while having ZERO ability in science - right Mr. DiCaprio?

If there is a problem, the "solution" is always MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING.

If there is an accusation of racial bias, it is true, if it is against a non-liberal, no matter what the "evidence" is.

WHY are American "liberals" so closed minded, so misinformed, so utterly devoid of intellectual curiosity?


Liberals in America are not liberals, they are....


 
Modern liberalism, progressivism or whatever it is is the most gutless path you can take. Results matter not, it is all about intentions. Complete crap.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
It is pretty funny the "liberals" here are too chicken to make an "intellectual case" to the contrary...
 
It is pretty funny the "liberals" here are too chicken to make an "intellectual case" to the contrary...
Um....you do realize that "liberals" are incapable of making an intellectual case. Progressivism is emotional. That's why they are irrational and implement failed policies. Because everything is based on emotions instead of logic and reason.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Google

lib·er·al
ˈlib(ə)rəl/
adjective
  1. 1.
    open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
    "they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"

  2. 2.
    (of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
 
Several months ago I tried to talk about true liberal ideology, and I brought up John Rawls and John Stuart Mill who just happen to be the most influential and famous liberal political philosophers of the 20th and 19th century respectively. Not a single poster here who self identifies as liberal gave them any credence, most had never heard of them and to a person, they actually ridiculed the notion that there are any philosophical underpinnings to the ideologies involved. They actually seemed proud of their ignorance and refusal to display any intellect.

We need a new term for this new authoritarian left because liberal they are not.

In a way, politics reminds me of cooking. Some people follow a recipe to the letter and imagine themselves as chefs. The true chefs understand the principles and processes, however, as they seek understanding in such a way as to apply such understanding to their craft. Similarly, these extraordinarily dogmatic leftists have no interest whatsoever in understanding WHY something is or is not liberal -- they merely want a recipe to follow that provides them with the smug satisfaction that theirs are the only correct and allowable views.

Goodness, if you told these numb nuts that liking dogs was a conservative trait, the good majority would kick a few puppies to the curb just to make sure.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Life in a disappearing country


This is a great example. The Marshall Islands are sinking because of "ocean level rise..." as are two other island chains in the Pacific, but precisely nothing else is.... so it must be ocean rise...

because it couldn't possibly be that those islands are on the lip of the Pacific Ring of Fire....
 
We need a new term for this new authoritarian left because liberal they are not.
Been there, done that .. the new term is "progressive", which was actually the old term before the common citizenry figured out what "progressives" actually stood for at which point they hijacked the "liberal" moniker and now that they've dirtied that one up they're going back to "progressive" because the citizenry no longer remembers what that stood for.

Different mask, same authoritarian, collectivist ideology.
 
Indisputable proof that liberals don't think. Here is a peak inside the mindset of the progressive elite - who laugh like hell at the idiocy of the progressive minions who believe their propaganda...

As they prepare for their exodus from the White House, the Obamas are about to join another rarified club – that of the ruling liberal elite class owning multiple ultra-expensive homes in highly exclusive communities that none in America can afford save the one-percenters. The very same one-percenters whom they rant and rail against as being the greedy, ego-centric millionaires who simply have too much.

Following the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton who (despite Hillary’s claim earlier this year that they left White House “dead broke”) somehow managed to educate their daughter at Stanford, Oxford, NYU and Columbia; acquire a $1.7 million estate in Chappaqua and a $2.85 million mansion in Georgetown

Bernie Sanders who shortly after ending his 2016 presidential bid bought his third home –a $600,000 lakefront vacation house

Earlier this year it was revealed that upon his leaving the presidency the Obamas will not be returning to Chicago they will instead be moving into a $6 million, 8,200-square foot, 9-bedroom 12-bathroom mansion in Kalorama, one of the District’s most posh, desirable and exclusive neighborhoods in the heart of one of America’s wealthiest zip codes

With daughter Malia off to college that leaves just Barack, Michelle and Sasha until the younger daughter graduates high school in 2018. Nothing says “I care about climate change, energy consumption and our CO2 footprint” more than keeping an 8,200-square foot house heated and air conditioned year round …for just three people. The hypocrisy and “do as I say not as I do” hubris of all these wealthy climate change proponents is sickening. By the way, the Obama’s new home is just two doors down from Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta, who recently lost the most significant campaign of his life.

Something STRANGE happens when Democrats leave office
 
One of the things Trump and Sessions must do is audit Obama and Holder, their families, to see how much they got selling out America for so long. Holder made millions not prosecuting rich people who just paid the Dems and him..
 

Forum List

Back
Top