Liberals are moral cowards

"But don't expect any JournoListers to grok those facts any time soon. They are too busy looking for evil among American conservatives. The Left is half-deluded and half-Machiavellian, and each half constantly lies to the other. The lefty media desperately want to be deluded, of course, like the abused wife of a violent alcoholic. It's a sort of token of love.


Socialist Europeans are knocking each other out like bowling pins today in their hurry to kowtow to the rising Fascist powers, who have bought all three British Parliamentary parties with their oil billions. Tony Blair is working for Libya's Muammar Khadafi today, which tells you where the Labour Party's heart really is. Eurosocialists have for decades imported hundreds of thousands of fundamentalist Muslims from the badlands of Pakistan with promises of lifelong welfare and four wives apiece, a promise that an ambitious young Islamofascist from Peshawar can hardly be expected to resist. As a result, Muslim fundamentalists now virtually control parts of Europe's major cities, including Rotterdam, Hamburg, and Paris. Socialist Europeans know that their countries are coming to an end as Western states. They are not as idiotic as they constantly pretend to be. But they are drunk on the perks of power -- and let tomorrow be damned. After us, the deluge.



Ideologically rationalized sadism and cruelty is not even acknowledged today by such lowlife organs as the New York Times. The Times mostly ignored and thereby colluded in Hitler's and Stalin's industrialized sadism in the 1930s. Some things change, but the New York Times always enables the very worst regimes in the world. It is one of those constants that give one faith in the basic stability of things. Tyrannies change names, but the Times always kowtows to the most bloodstained nastocrats it can find. They may even teach it in Journalism 101 at Columbia..........."

JAMES LEWIS

WHEN HAVENT THE "PROGRESSIVE" LEFTISTS SUPPORTED THIRD WORLD DICTATORS , COMMUNIST REGIMES AND AMERICAS ENEMIES????
 
So as someone that leans extremely libertarian, are the only two choices ; to vote Democratic and be a moral coward or vote Republican and be a moral authoritarian?

but...

we are NOT moral cowards....!


we are (quite bravely) very upfront about our moral beliefs....

I readily admit that I do NOT consider sex before marriage immoral
I readily admit that I do NOT consider homosexuality immoral
I readily admit that I do NOT consider smoking pot to be immoral

I think that is rather brave of me!

Seriously? You think posting an opinion on an internet message board is "brave"?

And enough with this "we" crap. Liberals are not lemmings; each person has his or her own life experience, POV and most importantly, vote. You can only speak about your own.

"Seriously? You think posting an opinion on an internet message board is "brave"? "

No. of course not.

I think stating opinions like these in public, even to the conservatively correct, proves I am NOT a moral coward.

and as for "we"
I don't know any liberals who do not have the "courage" to admit their moral beliefs.

MOST liberals readily admit there moral stands on issues
 
Liberals are moral superiors.

They know better than Jesus Christ, Buddha, Thomas Jefferson, Abe Lincoln....

We are lucky to have them walking among us. Where would we be, morally, without their guidance?

Liberals can be assholes, LuckyDan. (I assume for purposes of this snotfest I am a liberal, since I support the the rights of Muslims to open mosques.) But has it escaped your notice that:

Jesus Christ -- liberal

Buddha -- liberal

Thomas Jefferson -- liberal

Abe Lincoln -- liberal

And BTW, the opponents of the Ground Zero mosque have been known to be assholes on occassion as well. Nobody's perfect.

Joseph Stalin -- fascist

Joseph McCarthy -- fascist

Anita Bryant -- fascist

Sarah Palin -- amoral opportunistic wingnut
 
Should morals ;that harm no one but at most the person doing what another finds immoral; be imposed upon us by force via government so much though? I mean; come on; if a man smokes a joint in the privacy of their own home or if Billy and Bobby have sex in the privacy of their home; is that anymore government or for that matter my business; anymore than if someone is drinking a beer, eating waaaaay too much or having sex with his wife/girlfriend/mistress?
 
Well, let's see. Was Christ a liberal or not?

* Cared about the poor.

* Warned against the evils of great wealth.

* Encouraged...even demanded...that we look after our neighbors.

* Objected to the practices of big business.
 
Well, let's see. Was Christ a liberal or not?

* Cared about the poor.

* Warned against the evils of great wealth.

* Encouraged...even demanded...that we look after our neighbors.

* Objected to the practices of big business.

IT IS QUITE AMUSING THAT DIMWITTED ADOLESCENT LEFTISTS BELIEVE THAT THEY "CARE" MORE BECAUSE THEY SUPPORT LIMITLESS SOCIAL PROGRAMS...................

ONE CAN BARELY CONCEIVE OF JESUS SUPPORTING COERCIVE THEFT BY BUREAUCRATS TO SUPPORT THEIR WHIMS AND REWARD THEIR BENEFACTORS AS "CARING"........SUBJUGATION CANT BE CONFUSED WITH CHARITY..............

NO NEED TO MENTION JESUS UNDOUBTABLE SUPPORT FOR HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS AND ABORTION EITHER......................LOL
 
ahhhh... the lovely USMB...

yet another rightwingnut hack piece with zero truth, zero meaning and lots of nada.

do they intentionally recruit people with double digit IQ's to run around messageboards and post this garbage? or are they so stupid they really think their spew passes for debate?
 
Well, let's see. Was Christ a liberal or not?

* Cared about the poor.

* Warned against the evils of great wealth.

* Encouraged...even demanded...that we look after our neighbors.

* Objected to the practices of big business.

Jesus warned individuals on what the temptations of earthly belongings would do to one's spirit. He probably would encourage YOU to give YOURS away to the less forunate. He would probably consider it theft if YOU gave away someone elses fortune.
 
No need to mention jesus undoubtable support for homosexual rights and abortion either........

Thats what i said...............undoubtable support.......

Its just all sooooooooooo relative ya know.........lol
 
I believe most Liberals are just mis informed and that is very dangerous........


I think most liberals are well intentioned

I believe they believe in a kinder gentler America

I think that most conservatives are misinformed with a steady stream of lies, hate and fear

which is REALLY dangerous

I think pale rider and lone star and political chic would gleefully kill MILLIONS of liberals based upon fear and lies that they enjoy embracing

I think MILLIONS of misguided (but well intentioned?) conservatives would do like wise

on the other hand
I don't know ANY liberals who harbor such hatred against conservatives that they delightedly discuss various methods of violence to "do something" about "the conservative problem"

All one has to do is read the threads on the Muslim Community Center in Manhattan...who are the ones talking of taking violent action in those threads?

Of course....it's just talk. Being a Keyboard Kommando doesn't klassify you as really brave.
 

Forum List

Back
Top