Liberal Logic

Ok, that it?

I just googled "the hatred of white men" and here's what the first page holds for that query....








Now as you can see, Psychology today leads the pack with 3 seperate articles by 3 different writers denouncing white men, and Aljazeera my personal fav, "Abolishing whiteness....."

So, if that's the only thing in the OP you took issue with, I'd say, you are just wrong about that.
You said take it point by point. You can find someone online that says just about anything tou want, but ascribing that to an entire population is absurd.

I could say that conservatives hate Jews and find a dozen articles by conservatives saying so. That would be equally absurd.
 
You said take it point by point. You can find someone online that says just about anything tou want, but ascribing that to an entire population is absurd.

I could say that conservatives hate Jews and find a dozen articles by conservatives saying so. That would be equally absurd.
Ok, I actually agree with you here. Broad generalizations are always a debate loser in my mind. So, does that mean that the use of the term in here like MAGAt, and worse used in these Broad generalizations, you would denounce? And why should we believe you?

Point 2: Surely you can see that those in the left press certainly wanted to promote the theory that Whiteness was bad....So, while YOU may conveniently feel you don't do that, a majority of the left certainly do.
 
It’s foolish to base your opinion on data to you.

You’d rather go with feelings. Trump is a pro at manipulating feelings.
Total nonsense. You came in with debunked crime and employment claims. Clearly the value of data should be based on its accuracy not your ignorant say so. Then you expect people to trip over themselves over inflation slowing without regard to any other factors. Such silliness is difficult to take seriously.
 
Total nonsense. You came in with debunked crime and employment claims. Clearly the value of data should be based on its accuracy not your ignorant say so. Then you expect people to trip over themselves over inflation slowing without regard to any other factors. Such silliness is difficult to take seriously.
There’s no debunked crime data. Stats show it’s going down. Whether it started going down in 2022 or 2023 doesn’t make me much difference, but in 2024 it’s clearly down compared to when Trump saw one of the highest increases in 2020.

as for unemployment, Biden came into office with a 6.4% unemployment, fell as low as 3.6 and rose slightly to 4.2%. By any stretch of the imagination, that’s pretty low unemployment.
 
There’s no debunked crime data. Stats show it’s going down.
That's funny because the stats Biden was using ended up being revised showing crime had risen.

 
That's funny because the stats Biden was using ended up being revised showing crime had risen.
This article is fake news. They used incorrect 2021 data to compare to 2022. The 2021 data the article used was very incomplete due to a change in their reporting system, which led to an undercounting of data. When the FBI compiled more complete data for 2021, the rate of violent crime was a lot higher than in this fake news article.
 
This article is fake news. They used incorrect 2021 data to compare to 2022. The 2021 data the article used was very incomplete due to a change in their reporting system, which led to an undercounting of data. When the FBI compiled more complete data for 2021, the rate of violent crime was a lot higher than in this fake news article.
You are fake news.............

It’s been over three weeks since the FBI released the revised data. The Bureau’s lack of acknowledgment or explanation about the significant change concerns researchers.

“I have checked the data on total violent crime from 2004 to 2022,” Carl Moody, a professor at the College of William & Mary who specializes in studying crime, told RealClearInvestigations. “There were no revisions from 2004 to 2015, and from 2016 to 2020, there were small changes of less than one percentage point. The huge changes in 2021 and 2022, especially without an explanation, make it difficult to trust the FBI data.”

1738105072273.png
 
You are fake news.............

It’s been over three weeks since the FBI released the revised data. The Bureau’s lack of acknowledgment or explanation about the significant change concerns researchers.

“I have checked the data on total violent crime from 2004 to 2022,” Carl Moody, a professor at the College of William & Mary who specializes in studying crime, told RealClearInvestigations. “There were no revisions from 2004 to 2015, and from 2016 to 2020, there were small changes of less than one percentage point. The huge changes in 2021 and 2022, especially without an explanation, make it difficult to trust the FBI data.”

View attachment 1071912
This claim turned out to be false. It’s based on a misunderstanding of the data that the FBI used in 2021.
 
Then prove it hot dog.
I’ve linked the confessional hearing here the FBI tried their damnest to explain the issue, which isn’t that complicated, to some very low IQ republicans in Congress.

It’s been reposted just above.
 
This claim turned out to be false. It’s based on a misunderstanding of the data that the FBI used in 2021.
Even as polls show that Americans are concerned about crime, the FBI and the media are making it difficult to see how crime rates have changed over the last few years. A Gallup survey late last year found that 92% of Republicans and 58% of Democrats thought crime was increasing. A February Rasmussen Reports survey found that, by a 4.7-to-1 margin, likely voters say violent crime in the U.S. is getting worse (61%), not better (13%). A Gallup poll found in March that “crime and violence” was Americans’ second biggest concern, after inflation. But the media and politicians used the inaccurate FBI data to try to convince people that they were wrong.


“This FBI report is stunning because it now doesn’t state that violent crime in 2022 was much higher than it had previously reported, nor does it explain why the new rate is so much higher, and it issued no press release about this large revision,” said David Mustard, the Josiah Meigs Distinguished Professor at the University of Georgia who researches extensively on crime. “This lack of transparency harms the FBI’s credibility.”
 
I’ve linked the confessional hearing here the FBI tried their damnest to explain the issue, which isn’t that complicated, to some very low IQ republicans in Congress.
Bless me father, I have sinned?


 
“This FBI report is stunning because it now doesn’t state that violent crime in 2022 was much higher than it had previously reported, nor does it explain why the new rate is so much higher, and it issued no press release about this large revision,” said David Mustard, the Josiah Meigs Distinguished Professor at the University of Georgia who researches extensively on crime. “This lack of transparency harms the FBI’s credibility.”
Because there was no significant revision. These researchers accessed incomplete data and misunderstood this to be “revised”.
 
Back
Top Bottom