That is one of the dumbest logical leaps I have seen on this board, "SHE WHO MUST NOT BE NAMED' level dumb.
The issue in front of the court is if a custom made cake is a form of expression covered under the 1st amendment, attending the event or not was not part of the case being presented.
While the gun participated in said theoretical crime, it's similar to not suing the car manufacturer when a drunk plows into someone in their Ford.
It's about as dumb as saying that baking a cake for a reception makes one a part of a wedding ceremony.
Or as fascist as forcing anyone to bake any cake.
That is the crazy homophobe's claim. It's stupid, but it is the claim.
No one in America should be forced to provide labor. That's nazi shit.
They opened a bakery and invited the public to buy their products. They agreed to do so in accordance with local laws and regulations.
Then they decided they wouldn’t serve “sinners”. They used obscure passages in the Bible to condemn homosexuals, but ignored the Big 10 - liars, thieves, murders, adulterers, blasphemers, those who don’t keep the Sabbath holy, and focussed on one class of sinner, who Jesus neither spoke of nor condemned. This is called “bigotry” and “discrimination”.
I’d have no problem with these asshats using religion to justify their bigotry, but they have to stop serving other sinners. The Bible is really clear on divorce. It doesn’t exist. If you marry a divorced woman, it’s adultery according to the Bible. So why are these “religious bakers” baking cakes for second marriages?
Quite frankly, if these bakers stopped serving “sinners”, they’d be out of business. As Jesus said “Let he among you who is without sin, cast the first stone”.
When you obtain your business licence, you obey the law or find another line of work.