Ah, in the name of equal time, I have to slap IMAVictim's nonsense down.
Slaveowners received reparations for their lost slaves and the south chose to form their own country and fight a war.
Uh, not really. I had to look this one up.
The federal government compensated the “owners” of enslaved people for their “loss of property.” The people whose labor, skills, knowledge, and families were stolen for generations were not compensated nor given any assistance for the transition to freedom.
www.zinnedproject.org
While there was a small pittance paid to slave owners in DC, the slaveowners in the South were Shit out of Luck when the Federal Government bankrupted them, and then let the Carpetbaggers and Scalawags loot the south. The South has STILL never recovered from the way it was screwed over after Reconstruction.
OK. I'll post this example again to show you just how disingenuous your argument is.
It's a stupid example, really, but okay, let's go.
I am quite sure no one living in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government made the Fort Laramie treaty with the Sioux Nation or were participants in Custers violation of that treaty. Nor were they alive when President Grant decided it was OK to let settlers and people prospecting for gold tresspass into land promised to the Sioux thereby violating the treaty. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to take the land from the Sioux by military force. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to cut off supplies they promised the Sioux as condition for their surrender after whipping the U.S. Army at The Battle of Little Bighorn. But in 1980, the government of the United States decided reparations were due to the Sioux Nation for what was done to them in the 1800’s. They awarded the Sioux nation 105 million dollars
Um, okay, the Sioux were awarded that money FOR LAND THAT WAS STOLEN FROM THEM. And the Sioux Nation refused to take the money on the very sensible position that it was nowhere near what the land was actually worth. So your example is weak sauce.
If anything, it can be argued that when slaves were freed, they got a $1000 reparation in that their value was taken away from their owners. I personally wouldn't make that argument, because the arrangement was immoral.
And that's just one. Besides things didn't stop with slavery and the study of reparations was never just for slavery. But just like everything that has involved equality, dishonest whites to half a story and used it to race bait. When I was born, Jim Crow was in effect, and that had a negative impact that touches us right now.
Um, yeah, so? Hey, you know what, guy, everyone has a sad story. Get over yourself. On the other hand, black people turned my Grandfather's neighborhood in Englewood into a slum, and the value of his first house became kind of worthless. He finally had to move out when he found a homie in his kitchen at 2 AM.
So where's my reparations for that? Oh, that's right, I'm a grown ass man and I make my own way.
THE PAST IMPACTS TODAY. NO ONE HERE WAS ALIVE ON JULY 4, 1776, BUT BECAUSE OF THINGS DONE BY YOUR ANCESTORS YOU WILL BE CELEBRATING TODAY WHILE DECLARING THAT WHAT YOUR ANCESTORS DID 247 YEARS AGO IS WHY YOU ARE HERE TODAY.
Um, my Ancestors were in Germany 247 years ago. So my ancestors didn't do anything to you.
So maybe it's time some whites dropped that tired ass:
BS.
Nope. If you want to make sure we get another Republican President who will keep appointing assholes to SCOTUS who will roll back affirmative Action, keep insisting that white people and Asian people "owe" you for things that happened to other people.
Hey my Grandfather experienced a lot of anti-German discrimination between 1925 and 1950. Where's my "compensation". Oh, that's right. I'm not asking for any because I'm a grown-ass man who works for what he has.