I'm sure that it is irksome to feminists, who are still struggling for their issues. Rightly or wrongly, those feminists believe that the gender wage gap is the result of the patriarchal society. They also believe that abortion rights are a key, if not the key to women's rights. To avoid having this devolve, let me say that I don't agree on either, so no need to jump on that.
Point being that now that "men can get pregnant," and "we don't know what a woman is unless we ask a biologist," the feminist movement is being muddled, and all of its formerly clear goals twisted like a railroad track that derails their train. They can't champion equality in women's sports, without being asked their plans for when transgenders start winning all the events. They can't talk about sexual violence against women without being asked about assaults by women with penises who are allowed in women's locker rooms, bathrooms and prisons.
The obvious solution is for all feminists to be outspoken "TERF's" if I understand the term correctly. Trans-Exclusionary Reactionary Feminists is exactly what they need to be. They need to say that that women are women and that they support trans acceptance, but they will not allow the trans movement to hinder their efforts to provide a better and more equal future for young girls and women. It is the obvious solution, but most will not do it. Why not?
Because the Democratic Party/Liberal Movement has always been a coalition of many different and disparate interests, whose commonality is an unspoken agreement to each support all the others, even if only tacitly, so that all can achieve their goals. Various types and degrees of socialists, African-American activists, Latino activists, Muslim activists, gender equality activists, gay rights activists, animal rights activists, global warming alarmists, open-border activists, one worlders, America haters, totalitarians, and others all gather under that banner.
There is overlap among some of those groups, but also some conflict. For example the open border movement is extremely harmful to the Black poverty activists. But the leaders of the Black community still cling to the Party, even with successful Blacks starting to drift away from it. The Islamization movement will oppose the feminist movement if it comes into power. But liberals scream if people mention the misogyny inherent in the movement and feminists stay silent.
Now it includes trans activists, introducing new conflicts. Feminists, will not like things like elementary school drag shows. In fact, it is hard to imagine which traditional Democratic voters would like them. But they carefully avoid any sort of deviation from the dogma, which at the moment is that people who oppose kiddie drag shows in public schools are evil.
Just out of curiosity, for any avid watchers of the alphabet media, did any of them follow up Judge Jackson's statement with a biologist to tell their viewers what a woman is?
